Lin Wood has been right about some important things but has also been compared with a "carnival barker". This morning's Parler post about the Pope being arrested from a garbage page is especially difficult to excuse.
Is there a plausible "white hat" explanation for his posting?
Is it possible for a tremendously successful attorney to also be a naïve boomerposter?
Is he playing a role?
He's also a lawyer, so he knows he would be sued for what he says if it isn't true.
Think about it, nobody has defended themselves from what he said, if half the shit he has said is true that's frightening, and nobody has defended themselves against any of it...
He wouldn't put himself in a position where he makes claims that wild if he couldn't back it up.
nobody would bother to sue Lin Wood for mis-reporting that the Pope is being arrested
the OP raises a fair point - Lin scored a hit on Pence backstabbing the president and the republic. I believe Justice Roberts is corrupt and probably at some level was in on Scalia being taken out
the bogus stuff being spewed about the Vatican and the Pope, that is not really being backed up by sauce - pretty sloppy of him to push that
so when Lin Wood says Apple will do an update on iPhones to disable the presidential emergency alert, how does he know this (has it happened to anyone?)
when Lin Wood says Pres. Trump will put out a message over the EMS, how would he know anything about that - other than speculating like everyone else?
And to be fair about the Pence thing, I seriously thought he was crazy, then a couple days later, it actually happened. There are arguments about whether Pence is playing a role in all this, and that question mark colors Lin's contributions. Just don't really know yet.
To be a little more fair, when I see something he's reporting, I look for it in another place too. He can't post things that aren't accurate. I think he'd be putting his whole livelihood on the line by behaving badly.
there's the possibility that he doesn't have to really worry about making a livelihood going forward as an attorney and he's just out putting it all on the line, perhaps engaging in some speculation spring-boarding off of stuff he's come upon in various ways
he's probably not really any kind of insider, is where I'm tending to land, and hence what he says has to be taken with a grain of salt per each specific case of "info"
Could be information warfare?
Apple hasn't come out and said one way or other.
That's kind of my point, if somebody calls you a pedo-ass who diddles kids, you're probably going to defend yourself, no?
Unless it was true.
That's all I'm saying.
Yeah, it would suck at trial to have Lin Wood pull out some videos of sex abuse. The logic is pretty solid.
Don't wanna be on that jury.
Likely why the military is going to be the ones to judge them. Us civilians (and soldiers, too) would struggle to mentally withstand that kind of stuff.
The point is that the defamation trial wouldn't happen because the evidence of the abuse will be discovered.
Actually it is it has been picked up by many.
there's a fair amount of echo chamber reporting based on citing same so-called sources
when pope is delivering a mass today, then clearly he himself wasn't arrested
so source quality is clearly in question on all this Vatican stuff
The Pope’s message could have been pre-recorded.
Well his echoing of the grotesque aShLi iS aLiVe vid was the end as for me.
Exactly, it's far from unbelievable when you consider all of it.
And we still don't know everything.
great post, thanks for being logical. I can show my family this one, will help them understand Lin Wood better.
What Lin writes doesn't sound crazy at all. It's the Q research we've been discussing for the past three years going mainstream.
He has his role and he's playing it. The carnival barker, the movie trailer voice guy. I believe his job is to drop a mixture of truths and lies. He certainly is in the know to a degree but certainly does not know the plan. He pokes the hornets nest to see what happens. Who talks to who, what is the reaction in certain circles to drops and news. Mil int is likely the biggest beneficiary of Lin Wood atm.
Now there is also the good chance that he's just a boomer picking up on fake news and passing it on with the pope story.
Blackmail Inflation as well (see cultstate.com)
He was on stage with Sidney and Mike Flynn at that one event. Otherwise, I am not sure why we should trust him. And don't get me wrong, I want to trust him. I read everything he posts and pray to God almighty he is 'in the know.'
His association with them is what makes me think he's legit. In that video Trump retweeted 3 times, Lin is among the patriots it says to follow. If he's wrong, his reputation will be completely destroyed in 10 days. Surely he knows that.
Ok curt shilling
People need to use their "own" discernment. All these posts coming out telling others who to believe and who to follow based on personal opinion sounds an awful lot like how the fake news operates. Everyone is allowed their own opinion. Alot of people on here now starting to sound like judge, jury and executioner. It also appears that there are quite a few of us that have done alot more research than others. Alot of posts are old news. Everyone in our regular platforms have been censored. News will be coming in from unknown sources.
THIS.
A lot of people think they know the truth and are quick to shut others down. The only truth is that none of us know the truth.
I like reading other people’s take on things, no matter how radical it sounds. If anything, listening to others’ opinions will help us uncover or understand what is going on.
It’s like putting a puzzle together with friends. Friend 1 grabs a piece and tries to fit it in a certain spot, but it doesn’t quite fit. Then I take the piece and think maybe it belongs here, again doesn’t quite fit, but now we are a little closer to the solution. Friend 2 looks at the piece, recognizes it belongs to another part of the puzzle, and finds the perfect fit.
I think that’s how we need to treat all the info we are getting. If you can build on a theory, then do it. If someone else’s theory leads you elsewhere, follow it. Too many comments here are quick to shut people down.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Thank you! WWG1WGA
You must remember that he, like Sidney Powell, never say anything they cant prove...And a Lawyer of his stature knows exactly what the consequences are if he's lying about these people....Think about it, what does he have to gain by fabricating stories like this...?
Ok, pope thing might be real. Been trying to follow leads in the story, and the pages keep disappearing. Either there's a lot of people looking at this now, or it's being suppressed...
Looks like info on this is being suppressed. Any and all links/sites/pages talking about this come back spinning or "not available".
Anyone else able to confirm?
Hes not some vagabond off the street he is a prominent lawyer and highly religious. I have not seen the post and try and remember in this confusing time there are accounts being created that are not exactly belonging to those they say. The best bet is to tune in to his fireside chat tonight and if that happened he will say so.
And when THIS ONE turns out true, will you believe his next one?
In information warfare, usefulness and truth are often unrelated - and if WE knew WHY specific things were being posted, so would the enemy.
It's not like you can just say "We're spreading a false rumor that the pope was arrested to increase the visibility of Italy's actions. If all goes well the intentional misinformation becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy." without defeating the point.
Garbage page?
What news sites on the internet are NOT garbage pages?
The goal might have been to just drop eyes to the vatican, regardless, knowing we'll dig around.
One is, can we confirm that this @LinWood of Parler is the same as the @LLinWood of Twitter?
Two is, do we take the article that he posted at face value?
The article has some trails to follow that could be verified or not.
He did confirm both user names at one point
he has linked to his parler on twitter. it is him.
Been done already by trump
I think it was a tactical diversion. Several other places in different countries had outages as well.
To speak Truth like this you cannot be beyond reproach. Disinfo is part of it. Lin HAS to give disinfo along with the truth. Same with Q. That is the only way to get out any info. Our job is to sift. We are not on a need to know, we are not read in to recieve the straight dope.
juan o savin said he's playing a role: truth w/ trolling
HAD TO BE SAID.
Just a reminder please put links to what you are talking about in your posts.
I have the feeling Lin Wood is Alex Jones on steroids, yes there is truth to what he states, but he does say some things which sound like fiction, like the Pope has been arrested.
cmon man he is getting this info from somewhere... whitehat dark to light
The goal might have been to just drop eyes to the vatican, regardless, knowing we'll dig around.
If that dog wasnt barking right now what would you be doing?