As someone with thirty years in the printing industry I can say this - the ballots were marked with what is known as a ghost watermark in the paper. When I saw the sworn affidavits in Michigan talking about ballots that had clear grey watermarks, I knew this was the result of copying ghost watermarks.
To understand this, look at our new currency that has a watermark of the President on the bill in the paper. This is particularly noticeable in the lower right of a one hundred dollar bill. Now scan or copy that bill and watch what happens with that watermark.
I mentioned this on another forum and a gentlemen who was a graphic designer with very high-end scanning equipment didn't believe me. So he scanned a hundred dollar bill. He was then kind enough to comment that he indeed checked what I was saying and he confirmed what I said was true.
Furthermore, there is also a way to lace UV and/or IR microprint into ballot lines. This is done with alternating pattern so, in order to copy it, you would need to know the light distribution pattern that was first established as the security parameter.
Lastly, Pulitzer was right that you can scan paper and determine where it's country of origin is. Paper is basically nothing but pressed wood pulp which means it's composition is primarily going to be that of the natural supply of forests in the nation it originates. Here is a big hint, the wood composition of paper in North America is substantially different from the wood composition of paper from Asia - particularly China. So he is correct here as well.
"Ballots, like money, are printed on special fraud-resistant paper, with particular size, thickness, weight, texture, color, and formats made to exact specifications. Furthermore, the paper is impressed with unique identifiers, such as watermarks, that certify it as an official ballot."
He also said the ballots were marked. He's a bullshit artist.
As someone with thirty years in the printing industry I can say this - the ballots were marked with what is known as a ghost watermark in the paper. When I saw the sworn affidavits in Michigan talking about ballots that had clear grey watermarks, I knew this was the result of copying ghost watermarks.
To understand this, look at our new currency that has a watermark of the President on the bill in the paper. This is particularly noticeable in the lower right of a one hundred dollar bill. Now scan or copy that bill and watch what happens with that watermark.
I mentioned this on another forum and a gentlemen who was a graphic designer with very high-end scanning equipment didn't believe me. So he scanned a hundred dollar bill. He was then kind enough to comment that he indeed checked what I was saying and he confirmed what I said was true.
Furthermore, there is also a way to lace UV and/or IR microprint into ballot lines. This is done with alternating pattern so, in order to copy it, you would need to know the light distribution pattern that was first established as the security parameter.
Lastly, Pulitzer was right that you can scan paper and determine where it's country of origin is. Paper is basically nothing but pressed wood pulp which means it's composition is primarily going to be that of the natural supply of forests in the nation it originates. Here is a big hint, the wood composition of paper in North America is substantially different from the wood composition of paper from Asia - particularly China. So he is correct here as well.
Thanks for that info. This is something less than 1% of people know.
They are marked. Learn moar ballot knowledge.
https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/news/10346-ballots-are-secure-knowledge-on-vote-by-mail-is
"Ballots, like money, are printed on special fraud-resistant paper, with particular size, thickness, weight, texture, color, and formats made to exact specifications. Furthermore, the paper is impressed with unique identifiers, such as watermarks, that certify it as an official ballot."
They may be marked, but the markings did not make any difference in this election.
How do you know? The audits haven't happened -- yet.
Didn't they shred all the fake ballots already?
That's the same as any law, regulation, or rule: they don't matter if not enforced.
Also, can't election officials just print out more real ballots, since they have complete control over the systems?
there is a mix of mis-information in the mix here. doesn't mean its all bs. you sound like a doomer. we won. case closed.
Do we really know if they weren't at this point?