Jill Biden’s shoes swap during the “live” inauguration on J.20.
Why would she swap them twice? Using Telegraph’s live stream you can find all the changes.
TIMESTAMPS
4:45:23 - Beige shoes arriving out of the motorcade and walking up the steps.
5:31:37 - Blue inside the Capitol Before talking out to get Roberts’d
10:00:02 - Beige shoes again! While the Biden’s are on their walk of shame.
Connections
Jill Biden is wearing the shoes for AT most 45 minutes. She had to have them changed inside the Capitol. Then she wears them all day until the parade.
inb4 Her heels broke or her feet hurt
Then why would she change BACK into them while WALKING to the WH? Try harder shill.
The Chans think this is a continuity error. Can you find any more weird out of moment places? Or help me think of why this change occurred? I thought this would fit perfectly into the fake movie we are all watching.
Edit 1: Thanks To OG Henry.
Beige: https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw?t=17120
Blue: https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw?t=19885
Beige: https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw?t=36000
Edit 2: I wanted to see if there was any difference in Harris' shoes in the same timestamps. It doesn't appear so.
Arrival: https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw?t=17051
Inauguration Steps: https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw?t=19525
Beige: https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw?t=17120
Blue: https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw?t=19885
Beige: https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw?t=36000
Thank you for that. I’m on mobile so it was hard to get YT to keep the stamps. I’ll add this in an edit.
I was seeing this on the boards. Definitely validity to it. Not to mention there is already a lot of word spreading about it being a recorded event.
Yeah the people saying it was a comfort switch. But both were heels and she switched back into them.
There are other aspects to women's shoes that decide comfort, besides heel height. Women are looking at this thinking it would be reasonable to switch shoes back and forth on a "big day" depending on comfort and look.
Many women in finance had sneakers for the train or walk, comfy dress and dressy dress shoes for different (dinner business meeting vs at the office daily routine) on them plus the sneakers.
Thanks for adding that perspective.
One pair of heels might be better for outdoor traction and the others are better for carpet and indoors. I do this because my feet hurt in heels. But... hopefully this wasn’t her reason!
She’s also hobbling a bit. Means that her feet are hurting in different places. I DESPISE her but these videos are making me feel for her lol.
Thanks Anon. I'll trust your input. You can get a clear view of her walking at @7:51:30 and @7:56:38 in the teal ones.
yeah, the colors seem clear and graphically unaltered. And it's really too small of a target to use CGI to make this fake. This is the biggest proof of discontinuity so far. (The white/pink girls not being in the camera shot during the swearing in was a bogus 'red herring'.) Share this around, I'm a 20+yr graphical designer and this seems legit. Edit: After watching all the swaps in the same video it's plausible that the beige heels were the ones she wanted to do the most walking in but the teal ones were what she wanted to have on in the formal pictures at the Capitol building. Granted someone would have at least had to carry the blue heels into the capitol for her and then after the visit to the tomb of the unknown soldier (still blue) she could have changed back into the beige heels in the limo before exiting to walk to the WH. I'd imagine Jill Biden maybe accustomed to having a person who will carry her shoes around for her. https://youtu.be/FognBPhs5rw @4:45:45 You can watch Jill Biden walk up the stairs in tan beige high heels. @5:31:24 You see Jill Biden now wearing blue/teal high heels that match her outfit @7:52:19 Jill still has on the blues @8:13:18 Still blue @8:58:55 Still Blue @9:59:50 she exits the limo with beige shoes on.
Okay if this is true. We have their edits (The telegraph stream) in the form of Outside shots and Inside/Inauguration shots.
A poster on the chans theorized that the Outside shots (Beige Heels) would most like be the live/J.20 footage.
The Teal Heels consist of the more important footage. Ceremonies, in multiple places such as the Inauguration, Flag presentations(could that be why they were wrinkled? Interns folded them instead of Military.), I forget what else.
They couldn't have Brain-Damaged Biden stumbling so bad over the actual Speech. This might also be why Biden is saying "Salute the Marines" If it was a rehearsal, he could be just saying it for memory. I'm not sure if her shoes a visible in that shot.
If the Teel shoes was prerecorded. THEN that could be why Biden was Inaugurated at 11:48AM. They couldn't overlap the footage correctly and there was a Time error.
If you watch her gait and body posture while she's walking in the capitol (after the swearing in) it does seem to me like she's walking with a bit of discomfort. There's a chance she was willing to bear the discomfort to have on the shoes that matched. And if you look at the beige heels right after she exits the limo @9:59:50 they DO seem to bend in the middle as she steps indicating a flexible enough sole to do so which may not have been the case with the teal ones adding to their discomfort.
Okay, Thank you for your edit. I don't have that much knowledge on heels, but that makes sense. I found a 50 second clip of her walking in the blue shoes.
Can you look to see if you notice the same thing?
Its at @7:51:30 you get a good 45 seconds of them walking. Also there is a close up 20 seconds in.
Edit: Again at @7:56:38
Hard to say but if i had to make a call it does seem like she has shorter gait with the teal ones on and she doesn't seem to step as high or as confidently in the teal shoes. She almost seems to drag them forward with her toes which can indicate they are more rigid or don't fit quite perfect. Unless there's proof she changed back to the teal ones after walking to the Whitehouse it's hard to say she didn't change just for comforts sake.
It is possible she wore the beige just for outdoors... and the blue just for indoors.
Still it is yet another anomaly from the supposed "livestreamed" inauguration
Sounds like we need a Megathread to compile evidence once we get more data.
Question with this. Does the weather in the videos from the MSM match the skies and weather in this one?
What's interesting about this is that these shoe color timestamps both have notable events:
Maybe that's why we noticed? Seems especially bizarre to think those were scripted...but maybe? The point being to draw attention to the clip, where a few people would notice the shoes.
Strange. Maybe. I was thinking the Salute the Marines was a rehearsal event. Like Biden saying to remember.
I'm starting to question which shots were live and which shots were pre-recorded.
Secret Service? Can't tell if pin is U.S. flag?
Makes me wonder if there are more of him watching over Biden? Somewhat discerning as to what he is privy to and what his real purpose is. Doesn't exactly blend in with everyone.
He is a Korean-American working for Secret Service. Saw that elsewhere because I noted him during the inauguration. Also noted Asians behind Hunter and behind Kamala. Thought it was strange.
It's David Cho of USSS: https://www.dhs.gov/exceptional-service-2019
No, not maybe. Fact. Compare:
https://media.communities.win/post/fF1jU7qh.jpeg
with: https://www.dhs.gov/medialibrary-assets/assets-temp/191106-h-sk590-0804.jpg
it was obviously filmed over 2 days without a professional continuity consultant or wardrobe director.... and of course the cast are not pros either....
the two girls in pink reappear and disappear.... the girl behind them with mousey hair has a floral mask then a black one......
its two days...... they filmed the rehersal and maybe actually they filmed the two rehersals and then the 20th never happened.... cancelling the rehersals was a tactic to throw off protesters....
it also explains the tense low energy vibe as it was just a rehersal... only kammeltoe put in a half decent performance....
doesnt really mean anything in and of itself.... just rather dystopian and wierd.....
but doesnt mean biden is not president or anything is gonna stop this farce....
the castle rock of Q could be a kinda joke tip that the inaug would be a farce..... still doesnt give us much for next week......
there is a marked tendency under the circumstances to jump to conclusions..... keep it simple stoopid...
did they film 2 rehersals and splice it up and say hey... we got enough here... lets just air that on the day.... or did Q and co. build an underground set on the moon and have Elon fly evryone there and film it and keep them in the secret luna moon prison....
Arriving with Tan Shoes
https://i.maga.host/5AQNv47.png
A short time later Teal Shoes
https://i.maga.host/LVHgC3a.png
I couldn't find footage of them leaving.
The time from entrance into White House (tan shoes) to walk down stairs (change to teal shoes) is approximately 26 minutes on the YouTube inauguration movie.
Wait. Are you saying that she changed back into the Teal ones at the White House? Like after the parade walk?
Actors wear the same outfit day after day.
You fuckin brilliant bastards. Once I heard it was 2 different recordings spliced together all I've had to go off of was my memory of watching it live, and the bible orientation being different from what I remember. THANK YOU FREN!
Simon Parkes specifically mentioned looking at the shoes of the females during the inauguration to prove that some of it was already pre recorded.
she could have busted a heal, for fucks sake...
this is digging in the dirt, if you ask me.
Why not note and question observed inconsistencies? Why get so defensive when it's mentioned? Why waste your time negatively commenting if you weren't concerned that some fuckery is actually happening? I don't get why you would instantly assume anything without actually coming with a fact to back it up.
When I find posts here that can be debunked, I comment on them. Arbitrarily dismissing a suspicion without any effort and making an assumption is not only lazy but suspect.
It's not the one and only reason. It's just another reason/question to bring to the table. Again you assuming that OP or I think the shoes is the reason it's all a sham is suspect. I don't get why you are assuming that of us.
lol it's my fucking opinion, guy..
jeezus, is that not what free speech is about ?
the shoes are INCIDENTAL and if this movement is about 'guiding normies', I suggest focusing on the bigger picture.
You can't have an opinion. @jack said so.
Interesting. The thing that stands out to me is that both of these shoes are heeled. If one of the pairs were flats, it would make sense to swap for comfort. But swapping from one pair of heels to another pair of heels is odd.
My wife does that. Some heels are a lot more comfortable I guess.
Wow, hats off to her. I've only moved from heels to flats.
Maybe she broke a heel. Bitches be trippin, ya know
She is seen back in them walking though
Then the official Capitol cobbler fixed them right up for her so she can put them back on later?
I'm not saying this proves it was staged, but this explanation of a broken heel is pretty ridiculous.
LMAO. The secret cobbler. How the fuck could I have forgotten that.
It want an explanation. It was a joke, you dullard. Smh
But I already got you with the inb4 her heels broke. So its like you ran into a spiked wall.
You know what? I don't care. It's ALL a show, haven't you figured that out yet? I don't think we gain anything by trying to decipher mysteries surrounding Jill Biden's shoes. I'd rather stick to the issues...
Many cancelled rehearsals. Weird continuities. Hmm. Wouldn’t it be an issue if we saw a fake “live” inauguration.
Plus the recent WH shenanigans makes this even funnier. Thanks for the comment though!
Are we sure they were actually cancelled? Could have told them it was "officially cancelled for security reasons, but we'll do it in secret anyway". So the video we've seen could have been edited together from two different rehearsals.
It could sense with all the other stuff that's "off" about the inauguration footage. Like the fact that none of the participants seem to care what's going on. It honestly looks more like a rehearsal than the real deal.
Good point. Thanks anon!
yeah but i dont know too many women that carry extra pairs of shoes in their hand bag....
there are flaws and wierd changes in the footage.... seems it was shot over two days...... and spliced... simple enough.....
Why are shills so fucking sexist.