OK Gang ... Lemme put this waste of server space to pasture.
The Officer in the center (I know he is an officer because of the Gold Flouishes on his service cap), is wearing a Cold Weather Dress Coat. You do not wear awards and badges on those. You cannot see his rank from this photo, but if you could I'd give you 100-1 that it is a General Officer.
There is no discernable spoopy in the photo other than the devils concubines are also pictured (to his left and right).
Yes, exactly what I was about to say.
Upvote this to the top for visibility...
It doesn't change the fact that he's a pansy for wearing it though.
spez: Army Regulation AR 670-1 Chapter 20-19 to be more specific on the guidelines surrounding the usage of ceremonial blue overcoats (CBO) with white bib scarf.
The Ceremonial Blue Overcoat with white scarf is worn only on formal ceremonial occasions when (a) cold temperatures demand more protection from the elements than the Army Service Uniform coat can reasonably provide, and (b) the standard black all-weather coat is not suitable for the formality or solemnity of the occasion. Shoulder straps are worn on the CBO, and the Army Service Uniform coat may not be worn under the CBO.
i think its in the regulations when its below 32 the overcoat is worn. so yes it is fishy he is wearing it. i would be hot in it if i was wearing it. those are heavy duty
Even when it's below 32, you will hardly find any servicemembers wear cold weather gear unless they are in the field or it's raining hard.
It's usually up at the commander's discretion or if you're an officer, you can usually get away with whatever as long as topguy likes you.
So the decision was probably his to wear it. Since he decided to be a pansy, his standard issue would not have fit the occasion as that black trench coat is not very ceremonial. Hence the use of the CBO (under which you do not wear ASU coat).
"Instead, Biden gazed out on a cold Washington morning dotted with snow flurries to see over 200,000 American flags planted on the National Mall to symbolize those who could not attend in person."
My retort to this is simple. If the reason the marines etc aren't saluting Biden is because they aren't real marines they are actors then the easy way to dress this guy would be to use the cold weather as an excuse to just put a overcoat on him. No need to worry about the details of medals and other stuff they know they might get wrong. Just toss him in a coat.
I'm not saying they are or aren't real military. I'm just saying if some or all of this is fake for whatever reason they would take the easy way. ALL of this crap feels off. The part that got me was watching the guys march in the parade. It looked like they got a bunch college ROTC freshmen and dress them up in costumes then told them to march after only a weeks practice.
I'm not saying Biden isn't POTUS but its clear none of this crap is normal.
Schrödinger's Presidency. He is both POTUS and NOT POTUS until the evidence of voter fraud is observed by the world.
Is there definitive proof that the video in question was filmed from Biden's motorcade? No.
There's your answer, the National Guardsmen likely didn't salute because it wasn't the "President's" procession. It would definitely be at the very least a discourtesy if not blatant article 88 material if they did it knowingly.
Not much of a "logical operator" if you make straw man arguments.
We don't stoop to the level of the lawless. We are seeking justice and we do so wielding truth against their lies.
Definitive proof of voter fraud & interference == just cause for action
Unverifiable source material just muddies up fact and fiction. Whether or not that material came from shills or from genuine misunderstanding, the proof must be irrefutable. The Awakening is only complete when the dam is completely broken.
Army Regulation AR 670-1 Chapter 20-19 to be more specific on the guidelines surrounding the usage of ceremonial blue overcoats (CBO) with white bib scarf.
The Ceremonial Blue Overcoat with white scarf is worn only on formal ceremonial occasions when (a) cold temperatures demand more protection from the elements than the Army Service Uniform coat can reasonably provide, and (b) the standard black all-weather coat is not suitable for the formality or solemnity of the occasion. Shoulder straps are worn on the CBO, and the Army Service Uniform coat may not be worn under the CBO.
Just our luck that OP choose a 200px dimension image. Or is it?
That's exactly why I keep telling you people, stop doing that! It's a fucking shill tactic to waste everyone's time. If you are not a shill, stop posting this pixelated crap!
I keep reusing the same response because people don't read and keep spouting disinformation.
And no, no ASU coat would be worn under the CBO. This isn't the trench coat that a lot of soldiers wear during Army Balls and events such as those. This is
"ceremonial" garb...
Army Regulation AR 670-1 Chapter 20-19 to be more specific on the guidelines surrounding the usage of ceremonial blue overcoats (CBO) with white bib scarf.
The Ceremonial Blue Overcoat with white scarf is worn only on formal ceremonial occasions when (a) cold temperatures demand more protection from the elements than the Army Service Uniform coat can reasonably provide, and (b) the standard black all-weather coat is not suitable for the formality or solemnity of the occasion. Shoulder straps are worn on the CBO, and the Army Service Uniform coat may not be worn under the CBO.
Here is the video. Looks like if he is wearing a tie then the scarf is covering up. Looks to be a non issue. But it is good to dig in and separate the wheat from the chaff.
Then no one would have dug into it. We don’t know it is false till we get some data from others. It the entire MO of the movement. We go through shit and we learn and other learn from our mistakes. If someone is going to forward something like this and not even go through a dozen comments then they will pick this up somewhere else. I didn’t create this meme. I found it. So that mean other will find it to. Now when some of the hopefully 100s of people see this posted elsewhere they can effectively smack it down quickly.
Into what? That he is wearing a white scarf, which you can clearly see in every stream, as long as not some idiot comes along lowering the resolution to pixel fck all?
No. Stop wasting everyone's time with obvious crap like that! Go look up a better source BEFORE you post it here, not AFTER. Figuring this out took me 2 minutes, which you apparently aren't willing to contribute to this forum.
It's called Q RESEARCH, not Q-I-Found-Some-Shit-On-Telegram.
Lol. You still don’t understand the process. I didn’t even know what to look for until I posted this. Only with the data provided was I able to find what I did.
How is this complicated. If you want to be a gate keeper you gonna need to bump up that IQ.
What stream? The one I already posted to the comment? Lol. Smh. That stream? Or did you now read the comments befor3 you started setting yourself?
Go away. Your whole comment is worthless. Leave the people who are actually bringing data continue to do so. Go yell at the kids to get off your lawn or get back to whittling or whatever you do.
You pose questions in the title. Have you tried just for a second to answer them yourself? Or do you just post whatever and let everyone else do the work? Sure looks like it. You can try and ridicule me all you want. That won't change that appearance.
You just made ~80 people read this and run with it. Need it spelled out? You just made ~80 people believe complete BS. Are you seriously arguing about that being a bad thing now? Really?
How do you know I didn't see that? Because I don't mention it?
Nah, man. I don't mention it, because it does jack shit to the damage you have caused here. The people have read it, upvoted it and went on. Are you new to this micro-blogging, social-media thing, or what? Tell me, if so. I go less hard on you then. If not, you should know that this is how it works.
Those people won't return to ever see your comment. You just damaged your fellow Anons and, again, you don't seem to give a single fuck about it. Can you eventually get that in your thick head?
The Goal-Seeking thought processes here are mind-blowing. Not every little thing carries great significance....like the 21-gun salute. 3 or 4 guns has zero meaning; because Trump and Biden both needed guns, Guns Platoon was likely in a pinch....or they only have 7 guns in total, I don’t know. As long as Biden got 21 volleys, it’s legit. I served in The Old Guard for three years.
Concentrate on meaning ful things for Pete’s Sake!
Not every little thing carries great significance....
That’s like telling us the sky is blue.
Things should be brought up and discussed. Don’t try to prevent the process. The process is how we learn. Because this was brought up. We have now been able to fully determine this is a non issue and everything had a legit reason. Look at my other comment. I provided a clear link to the video showing a scarf and even found the general in question. Respect the process.
The process of what exactly? Stuff like this is nothing but a waste of time or clickbait. I’m here to learn not be titillated by every stupid thing y’all post. Spend two seconds researching your own question and with that answer, don’t bother to post....because it is literally nothing. Especially the military stuff; I served in The Old Guard and there’s no f’ing way they lower their standards even if they don’t like the guy. If Biden truly isn’t the ‘real’ President, you would know it. Not a chance in hell these idiots in DC can keep that level of OPSEC. Certainly not the Privates and E-4’s; they’re the ones who are in Guns Platoon, Honor Guard, etc.
I can hear it now ‘Private Numbnuts, make sure you fuck up that detail because Biden is an imposter’. ‘Yes Sir’!
I’m sure they can because they just did. There isn’t a thing wrong with Biden having 3 guns. I hate the guy but know what I’m talking about; was there for three years!
I did not say so. I was merely remarking upon your argument, that, even perhaps based on your own experience, it would be ridiculous to suggest the difference to have any meaning at all.
Your experience can serve as a pointer, but not definitively. Sorry. It would have been different, if you had researched it and said: this is what my research shows and is corroborated by my own experience/ observations. Here's the manual which says: every president can shape his own festivities. Here are the rules covering this issue.
So, rather, my goal is to make you aware, that by just making a hypothetical as an opposing argument, philosophically, it may help, practically, it leads nowhere. But supported by research ... we're getting somewhere.
Who has time for all this nonsense? Sorry, but I have a full time job and need to make more now that Uncle Joe is gonna raise my taxes. Hope you’re enjoying your retirement or handouts from big gov. Y’all are literally the Masters of Minutae.
Army Regulation AR 670-1 Chapter 20-19 to be more specific on the guidelines surrounding the usage of ceremonial blue overcoats (CBO) with white bib scarf.
The Ceremonial Blue Overcoat with white scarf is worn only on formal ceremonial occasions when (a) cold temperatures demand more protection from the elements than the Army Service Uniform coat can reasonably provide, and (b) the standard black all-weather coat is not suitable for the formality or solemnity of the occasion. Shoulder straps are worn on the CBO, and the Army Service Uniform coat may not be worn under the CBO.
The most telling thing about this picture is how they stand, their body language. Trump and Pence are close to their spouses, they are holding hands and its clear they are couples. Biden looks like Jill is a crutch. Or really its more like Jill is trying to stay as close as she can so he doesn't wonder off. She's waving. He looks confused.
But look at Kamala and her hubby. Holy... If she was a smoking hot younger woman in a bar and that's how she stood with her B/F I'd be hitting on her trying to steal her away. They clearly aren't a close couple. Its like he just showed up for the buffet and maybe a chance to hit on interns.
Look at how far they're all separated out. It's also like they hate the idea or being near each other or the military(fake or not).
Don't criticize when you have no clue. Scarf over tie, ribbons and awards are not worn on foul weather overcoats. Uniform of the day is designated every morning. The braid on the brim of the hat, shoulder boards and sleeve stripes tell the story.
OK Gang ... Lemme put this waste of server space to pasture.
The Officer in the center (I know he is an officer because of the Gold Flouishes on his service cap), is wearing a Cold Weather Dress Coat. You do not wear awards and badges on those. You cannot see his rank from this photo, but if you could I'd give you 100-1 that it is a General Officer.
There is no discernable spoopy in the photo other than the devils concubines are also pictured (to his left and right).
Yes, exactly what I was about to say. Upvote this to the top for visibility... It doesn't change the fact that he's a pansy for wearing it though.
spez: Army Regulation AR 670-1 Chapter 20-19 to be more specific on the guidelines surrounding the usage of ceremonial blue overcoats (CBO) with white bib scarf.
I checked the temp for dc for jan 20 2017. Wash post said 48 at 1:30. Same as for biden. Why the overcoat?
It's usually up to commander's discretion or if you're an officer, you can usually get away with whatever as long as topguy likes you.
i think its in the regulations when its below 32 the overcoat is worn. so yes it is fishy he is wearing it. i would be hot in it if i was wearing it. those are heavy duty
Even when it's below 32, you will hardly find any servicemembers wear cold weather gear unless they are in the field or it's raining hard.
It's usually up at the commander's discretion or if you're an officer, you can usually get away with whatever as long as topguy likes you.
So the decision was probably his to wear it. Since he decided to be a pansy, his standard issue would not have fit the occasion as that black trench coat is not very ceremonial. Hence the use of the CBO (under which you do not wear ASU coat).
It was very windy on 20 Jan. It also snowed that day. It was colder than 48.
It was very windy. Wind chill was nippy.
No it didn't snow.
The hell it didn't. I live in DC. Flurries, no accumulation.
And so few of those no windsheildwipers needed. No wipers no storm
And rain isn’t water. That’s a dumb statement.
"Instead, Biden gazed out on a cold Washington morning dotted with snow flurries to see over 200,000 American flags planted on the National Mall to symbolize those who could not attend in person."
https://abc7.com/joe-biden-inauguration-day-2021-harris-watch-live/9836685/
My retort to this is simple. If the reason the marines etc aren't saluting Biden is because they aren't real marines they are actors then the easy way to dress this guy would be to use the cold weather as an excuse to just put a overcoat on him. No need to worry about the details of medals and other stuff they know they might get wrong. Just toss him in a coat.
I'm not saying they are or aren't real military. I'm just saying if some or all of this is fake for whatever reason they would take the easy way. ALL of this crap feels off. The part that got me was watching the guys march in the parade. It looked like they got a bunch college ROTC freshmen and dress them up in costumes then told them to march after only a weeks practice.
I'm not saying Biden isn't POTUS but its clear none of this crap is normal.
Schrödinger's Presidency. He is both POTUS and NOT POTUS until the evidence of voter fraud is observed by the world.
you can't see the tie because he is wearing a white scarf
To quote myself again...
ASU jacket/coat cannot be worn under the CBO, ASU=dress uniform
Is there definitive proof that the video in question was filmed from Biden's motorcade? No.
There's your answer, the National Guardsmen likely didn't salute because it wasn't the "President's" procession. It would definitely be at the very least a discourtesy if not blatant article 88 material if they did it knowingly.
Your logic makes no sense.
Not much of a "logical operator" if you make straw man arguments.
We don't stoop to the level of the lawless. We are seeking justice and we do so wielding truth against their lies.
Definitive proof of voter fraud & interference == just cause for action
Unverifiable source material just muddies up fact and fiction. Whether or not that material came from shills or from genuine misunderstanding, the proof must be irrefutable. The Awakening is only complete when the dam is completely broken.
Real General vs Rent-a-general
Army Regulation AR 670-1 Chapter 20-19 to be more specific on the guidelines surrounding the usage of ceremonial blue overcoats (CBO) with white bib scarf.
What does this mean re: the photo? Is OP onto something or just confirmation bias?
means that overcoat isn't going to have anything on it. This does not prove the general is an actor.
WHITE SCARF are the keywords!
Just our luck that OP choose a 200px dimension image. Or is it?
That's exactly why I keep telling you people, stop doing that! It's a fucking shill tactic to waste everyone's time. If you are not a shill, stop posting this pixelated crap!
HD-Sauce: https://youtu.be/ZwvbQR887W0?t=25108
Roger, thanks.
Roger.
I keep reusing the same response because people don't read and keep spouting disinformation.
And no, no ASU coat would be worn under the CBO. This isn't the trench coat that a lot of soldiers wear during Army Balls and events such as those. This is "ceremonial" garb...
Look up Army Regulation AR 670-1. It's in there.
Unreal- I also just noticed Jill trying to wear the same color as Melania- gag.
...and Jackie
My guess is a scarf https://www.marlowwhite.com/old-guard-scarf
Worn with the Military Honors Overcoat and the General Officer Ceremonial Blue Overcoat
Army Regulation AR 670-1 Chapter 20-19 to be more specific on the guidelines surrounding the usage of ceremonial blue overcoats (CBO) with white bib scarf.
Here is the video. Looks like if he is wearing a tie then the scarf is covering up. Looks to be a non issue. But it is good to dig in and separate the wheat from the chaff.
Please upvote so other see this before spreading.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/biden-harris-inspect-troops-from-capitol-steps
Edit. It is likely it is this General: https://www.mdwhome.mdw.army.mil/docs/default-source/biographies/mg-jones-bio--5aug19.pdf?sfvrsn=18af3b04_24
How about you just delete obviously false claims like that, so they won't spread?
Sure, you loose some Internet points, but it is the right thing to do.
Then no one would have dug into it. We don’t know it is false till we get some data from others. It the entire MO of the movement. We go through shit and we learn and other learn from our mistakes. If someone is going to forward something like this and not even go through a dozen comments then they will pick this up somewhere else. I didn’t create this meme. I found it. So that mean other will find it to. Now when some of the hopefully 100s of people see this posted elsewhere they can effectively smack it down quickly.
Into what? That he is wearing a white scarf, which you can clearly see in every stream, as long as not some idiot comes along lowering the resolution to pixel fck all?
No. Stop wasting everyone's time with obvious crap like that! Go look up a better source BEFORE you post it here, not AFTER. Figuring this out took me 2 minutes, which you apparently aren't willing to contribute to this forum.
It's called Q RESEARCH, not Q-I-Found-Some-Shit-On-Telegram.
Lol. You still don’t understand the process. I didn’t even know what to look for until I posted this. Only with the data provided was I able to find what I did.
How is this complicated. If you want to be a gate keeper you gonna need to bump up that IQ.
What stream? The one I already posted to the comment? Lol. Smh. That stream? Or did you now read the comments befor3 you started setting yourself?
Go away. Your whole comment is worthless. Leave the people who are actually bringing data continue to do so. Go yell at the kids to get off your lawn or get back to whittling or whatever you do.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=biden+inauguration&page&utm_source=opensearch
Plenty of streams covering the scene. Plenty.
You pose questions in the title. Have you tried just for a second to answer them yourself? Or do you just post whatever and let everyone else do the work? Sure looks like it. You can try and ridicule me all you want. That won't change that appearance.
You just made ~80 people read this and run with it. Need it spelled out? You just made ~80 people believe complete BS. Are you seriously arguing about that being a bad thing now? Really?
Man you are thick. I already posted the link. Even before your first comment.
How do you know I didn't see that? Because I don't mention it?
Nah, man. I don't mention it, because it does jack shit to the damage you have caused here. The people have read it, upvoted it and went on. Are you new to this micro-blogging, social-media thing, or what? Tell me, if so. I go less hard on you then. If not, you should know that this is how it works.
Those people won't return to ever see your comment. You just damaged your fellow Anons and, again, you don't seem to give a single fuck about it. Can you eventually get that in your thick head?
The Goal-Seeking thought processes here are mind-blowing. Not every little thing carries great significance....like the 21-gun salute. 3 or 4 guns has zero meaning; because Trump and Biden both needed guns, Guns Platoon was likely in a pinch....or they only have 7 guns in total, I don’t know. As long as Biden got 21 volleys, it’s legit. I served in The Old Guard for three years. Concentrate on meaning ful things for Pete’s Sake!
That’s like telling us the sky is blue.
Things should be brought up and discussed. Don’t try to prevent the process. The process is how we learn. Because this was brought up. We have now been able to fully determine this is a non issue and everything had a legit reason. Look at my other comment. I provided a clear link to the video showing a scarf and even found the general in question. Respect the process.
The process of what exactly? Stuff like this is nothing but a waste of time or clickbait. I’m here to learn not be titillated by every stupid thing y’all post. Spend two seconds researching your own question and with that answer, don’t bother to post....because it is literally nothing. Especially the military stuff; I served in The Old Guard and there’s no f’ing way they lower their standards even if they don’t like the guy. If Biden truly isn’t the ‘real’ President, you would know it. Not a chance in hell these idiots in DC can keep that level of OPSEC. Certainly not the Privates and E-4’s; they’re the ones who are in Guns Platoon, Honor Guard, etc. I can hear it now ‘Private Numbnuts, make sure you fuck up that detail because Biden is an imposter’. ‘Yes Sir’!
And before somebody loses their shit, the idiots of which I speak are the politicians.
If you don't know, you are floating a balloon.
Research your position and come back to us with the result.
The question then is: Can the military correctly organize a 21 gun salute on 2 occasions in 2 places?
Which outfit is responsible?
Happy hunting.
I’m sure they can because they just did. There isn’t a thing wrong with Biden having 3 guns. I hate the guy but know what I’m talking about; was there for three years!
I did not say so. I was merely remarking upon your argument, that, even perhaps based on your own experience, it would be ridiculous to suggest the difference to have any meaning at all.
Your experience can serve as a pointer, but not definitively. Sorry. It would have been different, if you had researched it and said: this is what my research shows and is corroborated by my own experience/ observations. Here's the manual which says: every president can shape his own festivities. Here are the rules covering this issue.
So, rather, my goal is to make you aware, that by just making a hypothetical as an opposing argument, philosophically, it may help, practically, it leads nowhere. But supported by research ... we're getting somewhere.
Who has time for all this nonsense? Sorry, but I have a full time job and need to make more now that Uncle Joe is gonna raise my taxes. Hope you’re enjoying your retirement or handouts from big gov. Y’all are literally the Masters of Minutae.
For information on uniforms, look into the Army 670-1 ( manual for uniform wear.) Only need to wear rank on shoulders. With that type if rain trench coat. http://www.hcdmag.com/ar-670-1/uniform-accessories/army-coat/
Army Regulation AR 670-1 Chapter 20-19 to be more specific on the guidelines surrounding the usage of ceremonial blue overcoats (CBO) with white bib scarf.
The most telling thing about this picture is how they stand, their body language. Trump and Pence are close to their spouses, they are holding hands and its clear they are couples. Biden looks like Jill is a crutch. Or really its more like Jill is trying to stay as close as she can so he doesn't wonder off. She's waving. He looks confused.
But look at Kamala and her hubby. Holy... If she was a smoking hot younger woman in a bar and that's how she stood with her B/F I'd be hitting on her trying to steal her away. They clearly aren't a close couple. Its like he just showed up for the buffet and maybe a chance to hit on interns.
Look at how far they're all separated out. It's also like they hate the idea or being near each other or the military(fake or not).
Proud vs. scared!
You're spot on. The entire inauguration was this way. Weird stuff.
Kommie’s husband is wide.
Time and date.com show the temperature 45 degrees in 2021 and 48 degrees in 2017. It was 3 degrees colder during Biden's inauguration.
https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/usa/washington-dc/historic?month=1&year=2017
Source for this? I served in the 3rd Inf. Regiment and don’t believe it.
Source? I see no mention of it online anywhere.
Is it customary for Jill Biden to wear that color or did she try to "who wore it better" version of Melania's dress?
So, I am reading through the comments and coming to the conclusion this is a legit general? And he is wearing regulation "cold" wardrobe?
That's an overcoat, covering the Uniform. I had one in the military
this thread is debunked in the first comment, and therefor this thread should be deleted.
Don't criticize when you have no clue. Scarf over tie, ribbons and awards are not worn on foul weather overcoats. Uniform of the day is designated every morning. The braid on the brim of the hat, shoulder boards and sleeve stripes tell the story.
Maybe because it's an overcoat?
great post pede
Ha! You’re right! So many clues when we look close enough
Four years later? No ... it is not.