Full article at deepcature.com - Part III - How DJT Lost the White House:
On the evening of Friday, December 18, Sidney Powell, Mike Flynn, a sharp female attorney on Sydney’s team (whom I will call “Alyssa”), and myself decided to call an SUV and get driven to the entrance that serves the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, which is on the grounds of (and connects to) the White House. We had a vague plan regarding how we were going to get through all the rings of Capitol Police, Secret Service, and Marines without any invitation: Sidney and Mike were the center of global attention, and we were going to try to use that to bullshit our way past them all and get to the Oval Office. Beyond that, we’d be playing it by ear (I did say the plan was “vague”). There was a fine young NSC staffer whom I had gotten to know who, a real mensch, and I called him and left a message that I was accepting the open offer he had extended to drop by his office anytime, and was coming over … right then. At 6:15 PM. Not knowing if he would play ball, I may have been less than clear that there would be some people with me.
We were dropped off a block from the security gate, and walked through the light snow falling in the darkness. We got to the first security booth, and Sidney and Mike approached to talk. The Police and Secret Service saw it was General Flynn (“The People’s General”), and stiffened to attention. There was no appointment scheduled but they clearly were confused and trying to figure out what to say. Suddenly my staffer-buddy came out from inside, and when he saw Flynn and Sidney he froze and looked at me with raised eyebrows. I gestured that we were all together, and he looked shocked for a moment….. then did the right thing, strode over to the guard, flashed his ID, and asked him to let us all in, even though none of the requisite paperwork was arranged. With muted relief the guards quickly said, “Take care, General” and we were through the first layer. For the second layer my staffer-buddy and another of his colleagues who had joined up walked into the inner ring entrance before us, and spoke for us: again, when they saw Mike the guards again all stiffened to attention, looked puzzled for a moment (I think there is no such thing as a high-level visitor like that coming in without it being in the books), then briskly and professionally processed us all through as quickly as they could. They were silent and asked no questions, apparently guessing we might not have good answers if they did. I was the last one through, and as they handed my ID back to me one leaned in and said quietly and intimately, “Thank you Mr. Byrne.” I was surprised, and it was the first time I understood that in the constellation of Michael Flynn and Sidney Powell, there was a faint little star of my own.
We were ushered inside to an office, to use as Base Camp.
If I recall correctly, we were in Base Camp for about 30 minutes before making a move for the office of another NSC staffer, another young and principled person, with an office closer to the Oval Office. Camp 2.
Once there, Mike Flynn made contact with someone with whom he had worked in his brief stint as National Security Advisor, someone with an office that could serve as Camp 3, from which would come the final assault on the summit (the Oval Office). “Hey yes it’s Mike, how you’ve been? ….. Oh my Gosh, so great to hear your voice too….. Yeah yeah, it was unbelievable…. Where am I? Oh actually I’m in the White House! Yeah, just came by to see … See me? Sure well how about I just swing by… sure sure see you in a moment.”
We launched for Camp 3. And sure enough, when we got there, as Mike Flynn stood talking to his former colleague, Sidney and I had a 20 foot line of site down into the empty Oval Office…… After a few minutes, through a private door on the far side, Donald Trump walked into the Oval Office. He was dressed in a sharply creased blue suit and tie, still, at 7:30 PM. He came through and glanced out the doorway to where Sidney Powell and I were already walking towards him, greeting him like he should be expecting us. President Trump’s eyebrows knitted in puzzlement but his face showed he recognized us, and after a moment he beckoned us in. Within seconds General Flynn, Sydney Powell, and I were all sitting in the Oval Office with President Donald J. Trump, with the door shut behind us.
So that happened. Really.
The President sat across the Resolute desk and made small chat with Mike, asked him how he’d been. It had been almost four years since they had seen each other (when Flynn had left the White House, weeks into Trump’s first term). He asked after Sidney as well. I gave and received no more than a nod, letting Mike and Sidney take the lead. As I have noted publicly, the first thing I noticed about him was how measured, gracious, and even soft-spoken Trump seemed to be, so unlike the character that has beamed at us for years through the media.
Eventually he glanced at me again, raised an eyebrow, and gave a small chuckle. Apparently he knew about me, as I thought my be the case. He said something quietly, civil and kind. I said, “Thank you Mr. President…” He cocked his head quizzically and said something softly about knowing that I had not voted for him, and had said a number of critical things of him. I let him know the truth, that I had said some harsh things before the 2016 election, but while he was President my estimation of him had grown, and that in any case none of it was relevant, that I was there because I was confident the election had been hacked. I told him, “We think there is a much shorter route through all of this than your team is pursuing,” I closed saying, “But Sir, entrepreneur to entrepreneur, I feel I must mention something. As you may know, I have been swimming around the outside of your administration for a couple months now, and I must tell you, I do not think you are being well-served by many people in the White House. I can bring in young staffers who will tell you that some of your senior leadership don’t want you to win. They want you to concede.”
The President raised his eyebrows at my frankness. Then, like a man who knew the answer, he asked quietly, “Why?”
“I’m not sure,” I said, “but I hear people are getting signals that if they’re good boys and get you out the door, there will be jobs waiting for them. But if they don’t, they won’t be getting offers from the right law firms, they won’t be getting invitations from the right country clubs, they won’t be getting invited to the socialite parties on Manhattan…” Trump grimaced, and we moved on.
Sidney and Mike began walking the President through things from our perspective. In brief: there was a quick way to resolve this national crisis because he had power to act in ways he was not understanding. Under an Executive Order that he had signed in 2018, and another Executive Order that President Obama had signed in 2015, he could “find” that there was adequate evidence of foreign interference with the election, and while doing so would give him authority to do a number of big things, all he had to do was one small thing: direct a federal force (we suggested US Marshall Service + National Guard) to go to the six counties in question (the Problematic 6), and re-count (on livestream TV) the paper ballots that were held as fail-safe back-up. It would only take a few days. Even more conclusive would be if they imaged the hard-drives and those images could be examined forensically (which would make the project last no more than a week, as we had already cracked the Antrim County machines and knew precisely what to do going forward). In either case, if there was no mischief found, then President Trump would concede the election. But if (as we suspected) evidence of hundreds of thousands of improper votes was found in each of the six counties in question, then he would have a wide variety of options. He might have those six states re-counted. Or he might have 50 states recounted on livestream TV by federal forces, and America would finally have its answer to, “How much election fraud does our nation suffer?” Or he might skip that and have the National Guard re-run the elections in those six states. We pointed out that, it being December 18, if he signed the paperwork we had brought with us, we could have the first stage (recounting the Problematic 6 counties) finished before Christmas. And even if the result was hinky enough it demanded a rerun of the election in those states, it could be done before January 20, so that the January 20 Constitutional deadline would not be disrupted. The more time that he let slide by, the more compressed things would become. If he waited to see what the January 6 outcome was, however, and then decided to follow a plan such as ours, it would engender accusations of “sore-loserism”, so he had to act quickly. The alternative was an election that 47% of Americans doubted, which would not go down peacefully.
“You know Pat,” he said to me (the only people who call me “Pat” are either friends from childhood, or men from a background like my own family’s), “you know…” He caught my eye and gave a little snort of humor. “You know, I could leave here and my life would be really …. fine. I could be with my family, my friends, I could be playing golf …” We looked at each other and shared a moment as may occur only with CEO’s and other “leaders”: people think our lives are glamorous, but in many ways they are unpleasant. I had a little flashback: the first time I was running a firm, a 24-person manufacturer of industrial torch tips in New Hampshire, I went on a sales trip to Europe. Some great colleagues (engineers) and I spent a couple weeks of crawling around on plasma machines in a shipyard in Spain, a crane manufacturer in Belgium, knocking on factory doors in Hamburg, then attending a gigantic conference in Essen so we could walk around getting business cards and grabbing people to sit with us for a bagel to hear a sales pitch because we could not afford our own booth, but we needed a big order so we could make payroll the next quarter. After a few weeks of it we were home to New Hampshire, being received by colleagues like we were jet-setting royalty. “Oh Spain! How was Spain? Belgium! Germany!… Gosh I always wanted to travel, what was it like?” That’s when I realized that people do not understand how being in such leadership positions is generally not nearly as fun as people think, dreaming of taking it easy, of being able to take a walk without worrying about the (in my case at the time dozens, in Trump’s case, hundreds of millions) of people depending upon you. I understood why Trump was chuckling, and I nodded and chuckled along with him. I got just what he was hinting: he was thinking that from a personal (74 year old’s) standpoint, leaving the White House and going to Florida and golfing had a real appeal. “So Pat, on January 20 I could walk to Marine One and climb aboard and go have a really good life….” He continued, talking softly to me, directly. “But this? Knowing I was cheated, that they rigged this election? How can I just walk away from that?”
Other than that, of that first 30 minutes we had alone with the President, most of the conversation was among the President, Mike, and Sidney, so I had a lot of time to watch and study President Trump, and I was surprised on many fronts. When he questioned Sidney’s legal reasoning that he had the power to do such a thing, she pulled out the Executive Order he had signed in 2018 and described one from Obama in 2015: Trump took the E.O. and scanned it quickly, then began asking pertinent questions from it. The same with the finding that he would need to sign: he asked questions of both Sidney (regarding legalities) and Mike (regarding substance), who discussed with him the kinds of information regarding foreign interference covered in the last chapter. Throughout what I saw was a sharp executive mind, taking in information quickly and calculating decision-trees. It takes a lot to impress me that quickly, but what I saw was a sharp mind in action. It surprised me how I had seen no mention of it in four years.
Finally, Trump stopped and scanned the three of us, and asked simply. “So what are you saying?” Thinking of the difference between the highly organized and disciplined approach I had experienced with Flynn and Sidney, versus the college sophomore bull-session approach of the Campaign and Rudy-World, I spoke up again: “Mr. President, I think you should appoint Sidney Powell your Special Counsel on these election matters and make General Flynn your Field Marshall over the whole effort. I know Rudy’s your lawyer and friend, and he can have a great role in this. Rudy should be personally advising you, and we don’t want to do anything to embarrass him. But it needs to be Sidney taking point legally on this. And if you really want to win, make General Flynn here the Field Marshall. If you do I put your chances at around 50-75%. You should see how he well he has this planned, it would run like clockwork…”
The President shook me off, saying, “No no, it’s got to be Rudy.”
After some time (20-30 minutes), three lawyers appeared together. They did not introduce themselves, and stood huddling in the back of the Oval Office, listening. In addition, Mark Meadows and someone else joined us by speaker phone. Eventually the lawyers in the back began muttering things to make their displeasure and disagreement evident. Finally President Trump said something indicating this was new to him, wondering why no one had shown him this route through the impasse. I said again, “Sir, again, CEO to CEO, you are not being served well by those around you in the White House. I’ve gotten to know staffers in your White House, and they tell me they are being told that leadership here is telling them to get you to concede.”
Trump started to say something to Mike and Sidney, but he stopped himself and turned back towards me. “Who?” He asked angrily, “Who wants me to concede?”
I was taken aback by his anger, because I thought what I was telling him was common knowledge. I thought it was generally understood that about half the White House was in on the program of getting him to concede, for that was the estimate I was repeatedly told. “Sir, I am surprised you’re surprised…. In your White House leadership is telling junior staff this everywhere. I am told that this fellow Pat Cipollone [indicating the lawyers behind me as I spoke, not knowing which was Cipollone] has been telling people since November 4, ‘Just help us get the President to concede.’ And for the last couple of weeks, Mark Meadows has been telling staff, ‘Help get the President into transition mode.’”
I wouldn’t trust anything coming from Patrick Byrne
Amen!
Why? Not arguing just he does strike me as a liar.
In a sting operation. Is that a bad thing or a good thing?
As if he could control that?
Byrne makes me shudder. And if he wrote that piece, he needs English lessons.
Byrne is just trying to be relevant. CEO to CEO I’d tell him he’s a tool
You really believe Trump would sign a carefully crafted EO in 2018 and not know what it implicated and how it could be used?
If anyone hasn't figured it out yet:
1.) Trump not only knew they were going to commit election fraud, he knew the actual plan and basically told us BEFORE they did things what they were going to do and they did them anyway.
2.) At any point, knowing the plan in advance for the fraud he could have taken steps at any point to have stopped it - like Q said was done in 2016. Yet he didn't. This would have been the obvious way to stop the fraud if the intent was a second term in office.
3.) Trump also KNEW the courts would find every reason NOT to hear the cases. Throughout the process he was sending tweets to remind people at various steps (certification, etc.) of the law. This was done on purpose because it implicates them as KNOWINGLY certifying fraud (and catches them all in the treason). He needed to expose to the American People that the system was so corrupt that this kind of massive conspiratorial crime could be pulled off and lead the country into Communism.
4.) Trump is well aware of the steps he could have taken as President to expose the fraud. People that have worked with him in the past and did interviews all attest to how extremely intelligent he is. You think he forgot his own EO? But, he also knows the government has become corrupt across all three branches. The ONLY way forward for the US is a wholesale REPLACEMENT of all government - federal, state and local. As Q said, there are traitors everywhere.
5.) Speaking of replacement, remember Trump's most infamous campaign promise, "Our movement is about REPLACING a failed and corrupt political establishment and replacing it with one run by you, the American People."
6.) Trump still left office with a lot of confidence and a note to the American People that the best is yet to come.
7.) Q has said many times that the military was the ONLY way. However, for the military to be legally used on US soil against the government only one thing allows that to happen under 11.3 of the Military War Code - an illegitimate (belligerent) government must take power.
Anyone wondering why Biden is issuing orders so fast, many of which are illegal? Simple, he knows they have an illegitimate government and he is trying to get as much done as possible before the lid is blown off. There is no other reason for him to be moving at the breakneck pace he is. Let's not forget to mention the unconstitutional actions of Congress through all of this (certifying a fraudulent election, impeaching a private citizen, coming up with national voting laws, proposing making DC a state, among many others).
And before anyone says "but nothing is happening", realize that the US Military is very skilled at clandestine operations - it is how most of our special forces operate. I know so many people want it to happen publicly, and some will need to, but most will be dealt with BEFORE it becomes public. The military's primary purpose is the defense of innocent US citizens. Be aware, that the DS will do ANYTHING to keep from being exposed - and they don't care how many Americans have to die for that to happen.
Trust we are in good hands. Trust that the majority of the military are still patriots. In general, trust the plan. It has been planned and in the works LONG before Trump became President. He was just another part of the plan.
Wow this guy really thinks hes some hot stuff lol. This sounds like practice for a fantasy novel. Not that I don't believe there were people trying to get him to concede I am sure there were but this guy really likes to toot his own horn.
I know most of Byrnes' claims are opportunistic and dubious at best, but I can't help but wonder if there is a small ring of truth to Meadows' and Cipollones' obstructionism. Looking at their histories, they both have long tenures in swamp-related activities. They managed to stay under the radar during many of the staff..."housecleanings", we'll call them...until the very end.
Axios has an article about it too which, while filled with their usual slant, corroborates nearly all of Patrick's article:
https://www.axios.com/trump-oval-office-meeting-sidney-powell-a8e1e466-2e42-42d0-9cf1-26eb267f8723.html
I figured they wrote their article using Bryne’s as a template.
It was kind of funny to read them back to back. Byrne said he ate meatballs that were Trump's family recipe. The Axios article said Byrne wolfed down meatballs and cocktail weenies.
Seemed to have some truth to it. But definitely quite sad to read it.
If this is even remotely true, then Byrne was not on the “know list” He has a big mouth and an ego. I can’t imagine he’d be let in.
Interesting read
Yes - I knew when I posted it that it would create a lot of cognitive dissonance. Yet, I followed this guy from this site (deepcapture.com) in 2008 and on because I bought a bunch of gold and silver stocks that were constantly under pressure from naked short sellers. He took them head on just like he said he did here. I believe he probably spent hundreds of thousands of his money trying to gather the evidence needed. Although the attacks on Giuliani are not good, they are probably accurate. Otherwise Giuliani would be screaming that he’s a BSer. At the end of the day, I want to see all available evidence, the good, the bad and the ugly. This is ugly. Let’s pray that Trump has rested and is ready to kick ass.
Doubt it.
Meadows not known to be a politically motivated person.
Did he vote to seat electors that he had to have known were fraudulently elected? That's the only question that needs to be asked in order to ascertain who is deep state and who is on the side of the constitution. Thankfully all the votes are recorded. Meadows is deep state. When he had the chance to stand with the constitution, he showed his true colors.
Wow
Yeah if it's from Byrne I'm going to call bull on this for now until this is corroborated thoroughly by other people who were there.
Pat Byrne is not an insider. He also says Q is bullshit, which anyone who's done their due research knows is a ludicrous thing to say. I don't trust him at all.
Byrne’s account makes Trump out to be a dummy about what’s going on behind his back and also about his options going forward. If his account is true then Trump either had no clue or as I think, he’s keeping his cards close to his chest and not letting on to what he really knows. Perhaps making it look like he has no clue for optics to his attorney and chief of staff.
If you read the other parts (this was 3, there are parts 1, 1.1, 1.3 and 2), you would have a better feel for Bryne’s view.
I am amazed that you (the general “you”) get a first hand account of what happened in these critical times and everyone immediately discounts the value of the information. Information is information. Digest, understand, appreciate, use what is useful and move on.
His views at least up to now - are multifaceted. He’s laying out the players, showing his views on Trump (loyal, smart, well-informed on many details, ignorant on others, and betrayed by many around him), and telling what happened. His loyalty to Giuliani is problematic.
Giuliani in particular is heartbreaking because the guy is super talented but past his prime and a dinosaur when it comes to technology. I know men like him. Whether it is the warp speed rate of change or the booze, some guys don’t keep up.
It could all be BS, but if it were BS, I would expect Powell or Giuliani to cry foul. They are not shy.
reads like a cosmo article
100% BS
Is there a TL;DR?
Can you get tangible evidence from words?
Fake news, just some doomer fanfic
Sounds like it's accurate.
It does raise some disturbing questions. If Trump had the evidence why did he take no actions. Taking no action violates his constitutional oath.....