At first when I saw it, I immediately thought they were trying to get ahead of the Absolute Proof Documentary/other news that is going to come out.
But then I had another thought..... I need to go back and find this, but in one of his speeches, Trump commented about how Time Magazine wouldn't be around in a few months or something to that affect.
Could this article have been a white hat effort to slowly wake up the normies? Is it possible that the white hats have taken control of Time Magazine?
Thoughts?
I am not disputing this at all, but I just want to add that it is interesting that the article talks about what they did, with a left-leaning tone to it. The narrative being spewed is that "we did this to save democracy." So, "they" broke the law to save democracy? Do I have that correct?
Almost.
They deployed all assets and broke not only the law but the Constitution in order to save their version of democracy.
Yup. That's the narrative this author decided to go with lol
A cabal of rich and powerful men lobbied to change election laws, etc. to protect democracy and fortify our election.
So I can't tell if it truly is a ridiculous leftist that didn't realize what she was admitting to/a panicked leftist that knows something is coming.
OR
Is it the white hats EASING people into the truth with left leaning articles like these?
I don't know. It's just interesting and it made me remember Trump mentioning that Time magazine would either be in trouble or would be having a hard time in a few months. Crap, I can't remember when he said that. I think it was at one of his rallies.
In addition, I think the white hats quietly have control of twitter at this point. I don't have a twitter account, but my friend says that they aren't censoring his tweets the way that they were a few weeks ago. Jack went quiet didn't he?
There's also that rash of media CEO resignations. like Jeff Zucker. Maybe white hats have most of the media. In which case, we sure are watching a thriller movie.
I believe greta leaked on purpose as well. I'm debating whether AOC getting caught lying was on purpose too.
Or at the very least one of Greta's handlers did it and gave the finger on their way out.
Did you see the article of Dems arguing about the results of the NY22 Congressional race? They are saying the election was rigged because a Republican won, but a judge dismissed their case! How does THAT feel, Dems?
Interesting. Please explain a little more.
Kinda like Comey talks...
My guess is that 75+% of what we're seeing is a white hat effort. Everyone keeps forgetting the movie angle. Can't forget the movie angle
This is the only explanation that makes sense. Salty Cracker already touched on this but it's only logical that this is the first "inside job" that can be claimed by our movement.
The more I think about it, the more I realize it was the weakest attempt at controlling the narrative I've ever seen. They even mentioned The Cabal in the article! Leftie spin usually pushes that conspiracies don't exist narrative.... but this comes right out and admits that conspiracies do exist???
If this was truly a panicked black hat, then they must know some really damning stuff is about to break....
Time should change its name to Time's Up.
u/Deleted_Redacted posted this in an earlier thread: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hR2wviqH/x/c/4Dx3iNFb4iG
It's an insane Q-incidence.
The way I see it, anytime anything actually makes it out into wide circulation, it is always intentional at this point. If we weren't meant to know that aoc lied, the Crowder video on it, for example, would have been taken down. Maybe even tim "The Milquetoast Faggot" pool's video too. Any voices publicly explaining how she lied would have been silenced. Everything we have seen in the past month shows us very clearly that they can and will do this when they want to. This was always meant to be part of the narrative. The only question is, who owns the narrative at this point?
If it's a white hat operation, the advantage of letting it out is obvious: it serves to wake some people up. Probably not many, as the people who already support her aren't likely to change their minds, no matter how big of a piece of garbage she is shown to be.
Which leads me to believe that the AOC thing was not a white hat operation.
So if it was allowed to propagate by the deep state, what is the advantage for them? Well, I would say it is solidifying their base and forcing people to go all in if they intend to stick with the leftist agenda. Measuring the public response to such things is a good way of counting heads. It feels to me as if they are measuring things up to see if they have the enough diehard support for whatever their next move is.
And to tie all of this back in to the Time article, I believe the same ideas would apply there as well. The Time article, to me, represents the DS throwing their cards on the table. I believe it was prompted by the Lindell video. He basically called and now it's time for the DS to show their hand. The fact that he hyped up his video prior to release instead of stealth dropping it tells me that white hats wanted the DS to make a move to get in front of it, which they did, which is why the Time article came out first. He/our guys did not have to give them advance notice that the video was coming out, remember that.
The Time article was surely a DS move, but one made out of desperation. The line is clearly drawn now and they have read the room: If most of the population still defends the takeover of our country after reading the Time admission of guilt/justification, they were never going to be swayed, no matter what evidence our side brings out. If this is the sense they get from it, I expect they will still proceed with the mask still semi-on (i.e. they will continue the takeover via legislation with the base they have and people on the fence will do nothing). But if the Lindell video gains greater traction/acceptance than the Time article, I believe the DS will make their big move due to them feeling things slipping away. They will attempt an emotional takeover of the people still on the fence, forego a legislative takeover and go for all the marbles in one big move.
What's the big move? My guess is a FF at the Super Bowl, but what do I know?
Very interesting thoughts. This is the way I was originally thinking. I just started to spin alternative theories because that's just how my brain works hahaha
I always play devil's advocate, and I drive everyone around me crazy with it.
But I can't help it. I always see things from every side and every angle regardless of my personal thoughts and beliefs. I even understand how and why lefties believe what they believe based on the information they are being fed and how their beliefs are consistently reinforced. It's sad, but I understand it.
No they are stupid. They really believe they rigged it " for the right reasons" They believe the democracy fails when people are free to choose what they really want. People chose Trump, but in their democracy, that a failure of democracy. Their "democracy" is really communism where they rule is and choose what's best for us
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molly_Ball
The author is Molly Ball and according to Wikipedia you are correct.
Yes, I had the same thought and saw another article that supports the theory. I posted about it yesterday:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hR7UXix3/theory-weve-been-looking-at-the-/
It takes time for all of us to think.
Or, Maybe they realized the truth sells?
I was thinking the same as well.
Maybe she writes the copy she's told to write, we can't easily tell if she's under new new management
Yes, good thinking!