It wasn't an interview, it was an argument. She wouldn't shut up when the guest was talking. He always stopped talking when she was asking a question, then she would just talk over his answers. Pretty good to watch, though.
One point of disagreement: we do not want to find middle ground with commie baby rapists. We tried to find middle ground with the left for decades, each time giving up more and more of our God-given and Constitutionally-guaranteed rights. We're not doing that anymore. We fight for what we believe in, anyone who stands in our way gets trampled. Period. The left doesn't get an ounce of compromise, not this time, not ever again.
This BITCH perfectly represents the passive aggressive gaslighting the MSM employs when 'interviewing' pro Trump individuals, but this guy is too seasoned for her to get an inch.
Wow! He hit the nails on their heads and that vapid fluffy talking head didn't have a chance. If only what he said made some kind of difference to the media flacks and biased news-twisters. It won't change the media one iota. As the Ancient Persians saying goes: "It is What it Is" (Fahi ma Fahi!).
Wow. Verbal destruction. Anyone else see the guilt in the reporter's face. She was like a child who got caught doing something wrong. Great job Mr Van den Veen!!
It is true non of this would have happened if it weren't for Trump in the fact that if Trump had never ran and gotten elected, Dems would never have raised the ante to these levels.
She's just reading what the higher ups have told her to read..and her not knowing that what she's actually saying is that these were just small typos here and there, etc and she's not really grasping the fact that the prosecution just flat out committed & presented fraudulent evidence. He's rightfully describing how serious this is and she's completely and genuinely shocked. lol Too funny. If I was her I would be upset at my higher-ups for making me read this nonsense talking points.
Forgive my french but what an arrogant and condescending little cunt. Is there some type of secret course that these people take that we don't know about? One cannot help but want to wipe that smug look off of their hideous faces.
Let me play a bit of devil's advocate here. I actually don't think he handled himself that well. The gaslighting media whore talking head deserved a huge beatdown, but what he did in response to her was too full of emotion. The key right now is to redpill normies with a digestable set of facts that support the pro-Trump narrative, not to get everyone on here (or any of the other various pro-Trump sites) fired up with a single mic drop moment. I'm sure of course that he's upset at his home being attacked...on top of all the BS that we all see in our country today...but we need tactically calm and heavy-hitting leadership right now, not raw emotion. I don't know that this behavior is what the normies need to see to get them on our side.
That was not raw emotion. That was raw honesty. That was him choosing to be completely honest with himself and hence others. He didn't give a damn about optics because that's not what he wanted to partake in, and that genuineness is what is lacking in the rigid rules of "presentable TV".
I am sure that most people would rather see raw honesty than the dull facade that you're pressured to show on public TV.
I would counter that the "most people" you are talking about are the ones that are already redpilled and on our side. The "most people" that I'm talking about are the ones that aren't hardcore Lefty or evil but just haven't been awakened yet. For these folks, style matters as much or if not more than substance. You and I care more about substance, which is why we've already been redpilled and why we supported Trump.
I'm not saying not to fight back with honesty and the truth...that's really the only thing we SHOULD fight back with in terms of content of the argument. Pointing out when the Left isn't using honesty and truth is key. But considering that we're in the persuasion part of the Great Awakening, style does matter as much as truth in order to bring more folks into the light.
That is the worst possible cliche to use.
It is not one a wise man would use.
If you had a differing point of view
Simply state it.
No need to identify yourself as satan's lawyer.
Come on man... Think.
He knew exactly what she meant and so did we. If she’s pissed at him implying that’s what she meant then suck it up buttercup, the media have spent nearly 5 years telling us that what GEOTUS said didn’t actually mean what it did, it was some sort of “dog whistle” code bullshit. She just had the same thing done
I'm sure she will be reprimanded for allowing him to go on as long as he did.
I know, she did try to get the train back on the track but he continued to destroy her
It wasn't an interview, it was an argument. She wouldn't shut up when the guest was talking. He always stopped talking when she was asking a question, then she would just talk over his answers. Pretty good to watch, though.
This was already stickied from a post 6 hours prior.
We know, and we just can't get enough of it!
And why? Well, everyone else is lying. Truth is more precious than ever before, and to see it on TV is like seeing the rarest of ultra rare Pepes.
that was .......................... AWESOME!
One point of disagreement: we do not want to find middle ground with commie baby rapists. We tried to find middle ground with the left for decades, each time giving up more and more of our God-given and Constitutionally-guaranteed rights. We're not doing that anymore. We fight for what we believe in, anyone who stands in our way gets trampled. Period. The left doesn't get an ounce of compromise, not this time, not ever again.
This is how we need to all start playing. ☝️
This BITCH perfectly represents the passive aggressive gaslighting the MSM employs when 'interviewing' pro Trump individuals, but this guy is too seasoned for her to get an inch.
Wow! He hit the nails on their heads and that vapid fluffy talking head didn't have a chance. If only what he said made some kind of difference to the media flacks and biased news-twisters. It won't change the media one iota. As the Ancient Persians saying goes: "It is What it Is" (Fahi ma Fahi!).
I just love how he looks when he gets mad, that's so damn nice to see after all the Democratic lying charades! He's pure gold, I love the man!
Wow. Verbal destruction. Anyone else see the guilt in the reporter's face. She was like a child who got caught doing something wrong. Great job Mr Van den Veen!!
That's exactly what she was.
He shredded the media ?
She needed a blankie and a safe space after that smack down.
Loved it. Always get a smile when someone speaks TRUTH and those rats get called-out.
If only more conservatives with positions of power would take lessons from this guy
This has been posted at least a dozen times.
Hopefully you have an updoot on YT
And?
With so many posts being made they often get buried down the page. My first time seeing it.
exactly this is like the 7th thread on it
That was awesome... mic drop
It is true non of this would have happened if it weren't for Trump in the fact that if Trump had never ran and gotten elected, Dems would never have raised the ante to these levels.
they dont know the amount of distain we have for all politicians red/blue all the same to me like lawyers one in a million is worth a dam
Daahammm, stuck it up her South end and twisted it!
I love it; calling out the msm for their bias.
????
She's just reading what the higher ups have told her to read..and her not knowing that what she's actually saying is that these were just small typos here and there, etc and she's not really grasping the fact that the prosecution just flat out committed & presented fraudulent evidence. He's rightfully describing how serious this is and she's completely and genuinely shocked. lol Too funny. If I was her I would be upset at my higher-ups for making me read this nonsense talking points.
“Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait .....”
KEK !!
Forgive my french but what an arrogant and condescending little cunt. Is there some type of secret course that these people take that we don't know about? One cannot help but want to wipe that smug look off of their hideous faces.
Let me play a bit of devil's advocate here. I actually don't think he handled himself that well. The gaslighting media whore talking head deserved a huge beatdown, but what he did in response to her was too full of emotion. The key right now is to redpill normies with a digestable set of facts that support the pro-Trump narrative, not to get everyone on here (or any of the other various pro-Trump sites) fired up with a single mic drop moment. I'm sure of course that he's upset at his home being attacked...on top of all the BS that we all see in our country today...but we need tactically calm and heavy-hitting leadership right now, not raw emotion. I don't know that this behavior is what the normies need to see to get them on our side.
That was not raw emotion. That was raw honesty. That was him choosing to be completely honest with himself and hence others. He didn't give a damn about optics because that's not what he wanted to partake in, and that genuineness is what is lacking in the rigid rules of "presentable TV".
I am sure that most people would rather see raw honesty than the dull facade that you're pressured to show on public TV.
I would counter that the "most people" you are talking about are the ones that are already redpilled and on our side. The "most people" that I'm talking about are the ones that aren't hardcore Lefty or evil but just haven't been awakened yet. For these folks, style matters as much or if not more than substance. You and I care more about substance, which is why we've already been redpilled and why we supported Trump.
I'm not saying not to fight back with honesty and the truth...that's really the only thing we SHOULD fight back with in terms of content of the argument. Pointing out when the Left isn't using honesty and truth is key. But considering that we're in the persuasion part of the Great Awakening, style does matter as much as truth in order to bring more folks into the light.
It is not wise to advocate for the Lord's enemies.
It's a figure of speech. I'm not literally advocating for Satan.
For Pete's sake...
That is the worst possible cliche to use. It is not one a wise man would use. If you had a differing point of view Simply state it. No need to identify yourself as satan's lawyer. Come on man... Think.
Omg fantastic!!! Loved that and we need more of that!!!
? That’s how it’s done
That’s what everyone should see. In addition that bitch is a Cunt.
Didn't know anything about him until I watched this. Love this guy.
Be she had to swallow hard.
fuck yeah
He knew exactly what she meant and so did we. If she’s pissed at him implying that’s what she meant then suck it up buttercup, the media have spent nearly 5 years telling us that what GEOTUS said didn’t actually mean what it did, it was some sort of “dog whistle” code bullshit. She just had the same thing done