BREAKING: BIDEN Just Told The Government To TAKE OVER Christianity In America
(www.thedailyfodder.com)
Comments (93)
sorted by:
If you consider this a battle between good and evil (God and Satan) then this makes perfect sense. Religion is and always has been a control mechanism and this is just taking it to the next level. It emphasizes to me the importance of my own personal relationship with God outside of any church or religion. They call it the Great Awakening for a good reason.
The Bible says you must attend church. But the Bible says nothing of attending a church of you're government's choice.
Where does it say you must attend church? I thought it just said you must worship and love God. And that no building dictates how you worship.
Vatican isn't your problem, Protestantism and Freemasonry and Kabbalistic Jews are.
The Vatican was infiltrated by these groups some time ago.
The Catholics are the reason you even have a Bible in your hands. Martin Luther and other heretics messed with the Bible and removed parts...down to 66 books. What an interesting number.
It was Martin Luther and the other reformers who wanted the Bible to go to everyone in their own language instead of only being in Latin.
No, Martin Luther wanted people to have HIS VERSION of the Bible.
He was tricked by the Jews. Read the book he wrote at the end of his life.
Cope harder! Way to go helping the anti-Jesus Freemasonic agenda.
So a man who is anti-Catholic infiltrates the Vatican, gets his buddies in, fills the ranks with anti-Catholic men (Freemasons, Qabbalists, homosexuals, abortionists, etc)...
And you want to help them finish off what they started? You're working FOR the Freemasonic order. Great job.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOtKxMklQeXblEcia__pQt7psDuMRc2sA
The Vatican belongs to God, not the Khazarian Mafia. If an enemy conquers your church or home, do I burn your church down? What does that do? The Khazarian Mafia is still the problem. A building is where they hide.
Deal me in, simple bitch. How am I still asleep?
There is a person sometimes called “the black pope,” but his existence is not a secret and he does not have anywhere near as much power as the real pope. “The black pope” is a nickname given to the Father General of the Society of Jesus. When the Jesuits were the most prestigious, influential missionary order in the world, the people of Rome began to speak jokingly of their head as a second pope. They called him “the black pope” because he wore the Jesuits’ black clerical garb, in contrast to the real pope, who wore white and became known as “the white pope.”
“The black pope” does not have authority over anyone but Jesuits. Sometimes people point to him as evidence of a conspiracy in the Vatican, but what they really have is a garbled understanding of a Catholic in-joke.
The people who have a problem with the Jesuits were the theosophists (read as: Qabballah, Jewish mysticism, Rosicrucianism), Freemasons and the Nazis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZrJYyhYk9s&list=PLOtKxMklQeXblEcia__pQt7psDuMRc2sA&index=7
Which one are you?
Or are you going to feign ignorance?
Careful what you believe from the internet.
That's what I wrote.
What makes him an asshole?
The Jesuits were an anti-Communist order.
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
Is being anti-Communist a bad thing? If yes, hello Rofschild. Satan doesn't have any other busywork for you?
lol internet "truth" about the Catholic church? Basic bitch shit.
The Pope's hat (bishops wear similar - they're called mitres) are based on those of the priests in the Temple in Jerusalem, not on any pagan deity.
Twisting scripture? Come ooooooon. How much time did you actually spend reading that chapter for yourself instead of leaning on the understanding of some bunk internet "truther" "Christian" website?
(Certainly Christians agree that Jesus’ prohibition against calling anyone “father” does not preclude the honor due to natural parents, living or dead, even though that could be taken as the literal meaning of his command, though not even the most literalistic Fundamentalist takes it that way.)
Those Christians who are troubled by the title “father” being given to Catholic priests say it is an honorific that belongs only to human parents or to God, not to religious leaders. This objection can be answered from the Bible: We have six New Testament books which show us that Jewish or Christian leaders may be addressed by this title.
Nearly half the uses of “father” in the Acts of the Apostles appear in Stephen’s speech in chapter 7 (17 out of 36 uses). He refers to the ancestors as fathers, both individually and collectively (16 times), and once he addresses his audience as “brothers and fathers.” Paul addressed a crowd of angry Jews in the Temple as “brothers and fathers” (Acts 22:1). These are places in which “father” is given to Jewish religious leaders. The title is also given to Christian religious leaders.
The first New Testament book ever written, 1 Thessalonians, refers to Paul “as a father exhorting his own children” (1 Thess. 2:11). By this usage Paul places himself in the role of a spiritual father. In fact, he insists on being called the spiritual father of the Corinthians when he says, “You have in Christ ten thousand teachers, but not many fathers, because in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through announcing the gospel. Therefore I exhort you to become imitators of me” (1 Cor. 4:15).
More here: https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/call-no-man-father-0
Easy to fool. Not well educated on logic. Perfect target for manipulation.
And this negates the truth how? This negates Catholic dogma how? It was infiltrated by evil men and that proves what? Judas was one of the Apostles. One of the twelve dimed Jesus out for money and then killed himself. One of the men CLOSEST TO JESUS...and you think the church Jesus established is somehow immune from infiltration by evil men?
You don't care but you should. Your salvation depends on it. That's why I bother to take the time. This is about you hearing the truth. You are free to reject it but I am not free to stay silent when someone is dead wrong about such things.
Godspeed.
So then your problem isn't the Jesuits, its the group that infiltrates anti-Communist orders like the Jesuits. That's what I'm pointing your attention to. You have the wrong "bad guy" and you have all the knowledge necessary to understand that. "The Jesuits" is a Freemasonic boogeyman. It's Freemasonic propaganda along with other things like "the dark ages".
I watched it.
She references Alberto Rivera as her source for part of the Jesuit garbage.
Alberto Rivera, the alleged former Catholic priest, bishop, and anti-Catholic hero of Jack Chick comic strips, was exposed as a total fraud by non-Catholic (evangelical Protestant) Gary Metz, in two articles appearing in evangelical magazines:
Thanks but that series is FULL of anti-Catholic propaganda. Do you know who comes up with the anti-Catholic propaganda? THE SAME PEOPLE YOU CLAIM TO RAGE AGAINST.
You are stuck in a Hegalian dialectic that will cause constant revolution, loss, suffering and disease.
YOU need to wake up.
The levels of cognitive dissonance are astounding.
The Jesuits are an anti-Communist order and are have at times been the target of the theosophists. The Jesuits as a whole are not your problem. You NEED them to be your problem because you don't want to admit this information is gatekept heavily and that you're repeating Freemasonic propaganda. That is what currently runs the MSM and the Vatican bank, etc. The Vatican and Jesuits as institutions are not the problem, its the infiltrators and are also in charge of the USA government.
One place in the new testament it says "Don't forsake the gathering" Put it in context - he was talking to jews who kept going to temple and didn't know anything about Christianity.
Jesus really only left one commandment = Love each other.
Strong admonishment. be born of water and fire if you want to see the Kingdom
Not exactly.
https://www.thepathoftruth.com/falsehood-exposed/diabolical-doctrines/you-must-go-to-church.htm
"Keep the Sabbath day holy", remember that one?
edit: ahahahahahahahaha -5 downvotes? You are supposed to attend church and give God what he is due. If you disagree, maybe take a moment to articulate why I am wrong. Down votes? WEAK!
But does the literally mean “go to a church” or does it mean to take one day to worship, relax, and enjoy family instead of working?
Protestants and New Agers will say lots of different things. That's why I left that world. No authority, no real answers.
Instead:
The Catholic Church teaches that you have an obligation to go to Mass every Sunday. Mass is a celebration of the Eucharist, or transformation of the bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. Many people do not understand why the Church requires mass every Sunday. The answer is found within the Ten Commandments passed on to Moses several millennia ago.
The Sunday Obligation The Ten Commandments, which were the believed to be the laws and moral code handed down by God, tells believers in the Third Commandment to “Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day.”
For the Jews, the Sabbath was Saturday; Christians, however, transferred the Sabbath to Sunday, which was the day of Jesus Christ’s resurrection from the dead. The Church says that you have an obligation to fulfill the Third Commandment by refraining from unnecessary work on Sunday and by participating in Mass, your chief form of worship as Christians.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that "You shall attend Mass on Sundays and holy days of obligation and rest from servile labor." The obligation is binding every Sunday. It is a holy day of obligation, a day for you to grow in your faith, and you are required to attend to the extent that you are able to do so.
Private Worship Is Not Enough From the earliest days of the Church, Christians have understood that being a Christian is not a private matter. You are called to be Christians together. While you should engage in the private worship of God throughout the week, your primary form of worship is public and communal, which is why Sunday Mass is so important.
Can You Be Excused From Sunday Mass? The precepts of the Church are the requirements of the church that are deemed necessary for you to fulfill upon pain of mortal sin. Mass is one of those requirements, but there are a few situations, where you may be excused from Mass.
If you have a debilitating illness, you may be excused from Mass, or if there is extremely bad weather that would make your attempt to getting to Church unsafe, you are excused from attending. The bishop from some dioceses will announce a dispensation from attending on Sunday if travel conditions are unsafe. In some cases, priests may cancel Mass in order to preemptively protect parishioners from harm.
If you are traveling and you cannot find a Catholic Church nearby or cannot make it for a good reason, then you may be excused from attending Mass. You should check with your priest to make sure that your reason was valid and that you did not commit a mortal sin. You are required to be in a state of grace when you attend your next Mass and to participate in Holy Communion. If your reason was not acceptable by the Church, you will require absolution by your priest.
https://www.learnreligions.com/mass-every-sunday-542949
Goodness!! That was...informational. Thanks.
Have to admit Catholicism isn't for me. Always got bad vibes from anything to do with the Vatican.
I used to say the same thing before I understood the Qabbalistic/Rosicrucian/Masonic infiltration of the Vatican. If you want to learn more: "A Plot Against the Church" by Maurice Pinay "Infiltration" by Taylor Marshall (more about that online here: https://taylormarshall.com/tag/freemason) "ISIS Unveiled" by Helena Blavatsky (in their OWN WORDS about wanting to destroy the Catholic church, hatred for the Jesuits, etc.) "Aa-1025: The Memoirs of a Communist's infiltration in to the Church" by Marie Carre And finally, more quickly accessible and mind blowing:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOtKxMklQeXbXpwe4_Xk9vru9WGQJvXHK
The Rofschild are hell bent on destroying the Catholic church. Why? Why is the Catholic church the #1 enemy of Freemasonry? Even Muslims (who know what is going on) will tell you this. The Catholic church is always in the news for sex scandals. Funny how they never focus on sex scandals in public schools or other religions or sects of Christianity, just Catholicism. I saw what the media did to Trump and they were doing the same thing with the Catholic church but never any other religion. That piqued my curiosity greatly so I looked into the matter. Sure enough, the bishops and clergy who are perpetuating these SICK crimes are not Catholic at all. They are Catholic in name only. They use the Catholic faith as a shield. Jessie Czebotar was a woman being raised and groomed to be the bride of Satan. She said the witches in her family appear to be Catholic housewives but are nothing of the sort. They are Satanists who hide in the Catholic church. There is much more going on here than anyone in the "truther" world will ever tell you because even the "truther" movement is set against the Catholic church. Why? Well, Alex Jones being Mossad should kinda give you an idea. The "truther" community is gate-kept by Rofschild agents. What are they keeping us from? YOUR INHERITANCE. They are trying to rob you of your inheritance. I hope you will reconsider but I understand if you do not want to look. I didn't want to be wrong but when confronted with truth, I was forced to lie to myself or admit I was wrong. I had been wrong all along about the Catholic faith. Please do not throw the baby out with the bath water. Remember even Q is posting Archbishop Vigano letters. I'll post the link one more time to this playlist because it was a game changer for me:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOtKxMklQeXbXpwe4_Xk9vru9WGQJvXHK
Good luck to you! Godspeed!
Better than the Catholics do.
How do you figure?
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c1a3.htm
Moving the day isn't keeping the Sabbath.
Also, keeping Jewish tradition isn't Christianity, it's Judaism. Keep your Satanic Jewish shabbot.
The Catholic church has the authority to do so. You'll say "no they don't" but that doesn't change anything.
Doesn't this violate "SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE"????
There is no separation of church and state in the Constitution.
edit: I noticed one of you betas downvoted my comment but did not provide a quote from the Constitution that refutes what I have said. COPE HARDER.
Says who?
The Constitution does not say
... as permitted by law. lol. The old 'separation of church and state' should take care of that.
since when has the government ever upheld separation between church and state?
Was it when some person had to spend all his money when he was sued by Colorado twice?
Was it when the ACA forced Christian organizations to fund abortion?
How about when Congress tried to pass a law making it possible for non-Christians to have leadership positions in Christian organizations?
There is NO MENTION of separation of church and state in the Constitution. That's a lie from the liberals.
I know the fucking constitution and bill of rights hold no value to these people but WTF!!! This is literally THE definition of unconstitutional!
Well this should be a big red pill for people ehh?
If a church is under a 501c3 they have to abide . Get out , Get out , Get out !! Home Bible studies ??
Trust in God, not dogma.
Uh...reading the actual EO, it doesnt sound to me like he is telling the government to take over Christanity. First, it says all faith based groups. Second, my church is an independent fundamental baptist church. Big emphasis on the independent part. They can't take over our church. No one owns our Pastor. No one holds the purse strings of our church except the Pastor. He has a secular job. He is beholden to nobody. They couldn't force him to stop preaching against faggots and pedophiles (which are the same people) if they wanted to. If your church isn't independent, yeah you might be in trouble. But that's why the bible calls for local churchES.
The diabolical cancer was spread through all churches. Pastors in place to indoctrinate and usher people to wrong side. Squeals on anyone not lock stepping to the demands of the overlords You wont know until they are called upon. Trust no one. Praying this isnt your pastor however..but we cant see anyone as incorruptible. Its war..and it's never straightforward
Y'all go listen to Mark Taylor.
He discusses the 501 3 c devil trap.
Most churches are organized as nonprofits and have therefore already partnered with the government.
IMO - this opens up: 1) massive amounts of fraud and money laundering. 2) Non faith based organizations who can work directly with kids (funded by government) - thinking New Pedo harvesting. 3) New habit of faith based working with govt. at some point the partnership starts coming with more strings attached...
Israel? What the hell are you on about?