...their receipts are still interpretation "evidence".
Like, Ya'll do realize they have a press pass, right? They have SS vetting to be anywhere near the prez and to be able to live streams CPAC and his presidential speeches.
Also, considering by Evs' very own reasearch, they have been setup for years. Meaning, their internet connections were setup before everything went tits up.
Sooo....like to me that isn't convincing.
I don't think anyone in 2017 would have imagined that in 2020 the deepness of corruption in seemingly apolitical functions such as net hosts and servers would be. So to retroactively call them shills when the territory pre-2019 was completely different is backwards attributing sinister intent by using the current political atmosphere.
Those are barely receipts if viewed with pre-2019 eyes.
You emphasizing ‘remotely’ does not phase me. You are an internet person to me, you don’t give me love nor pay my bills.
Pray for DJT45 at any rate. I’m over this with you guys. We are in this for our children and DJT45 but downvoting does nothing when we are all fighting the same common cause.
This board passionately believes in the Bill of Rights. And (nearly) everybody here is smart enough to know that "free speech" patently doesn't apply in a small, private closed group.
Demanding "FREE SPEECH" in such a forum is a ridiculous, suicidal demand to surrender the place to hecklers, trolls, confederates and chemtrailers.
None of this is novel or controversial. Stop it with your absurd, juvenile attempts to yell "FREE SPEECH" when your pet cause or safety blanket website is exposed and deprecated in a private forum.
We have moderators for a clear and obvious and entirely legitimate purpose. Bless our mods.
No actually there's no hive mind compagno, just that you have no clue of what happened and have 0 facts, if you really think George news is legit, look at their pages trackbacks and look how they will lovely accept and track each user that decides to follow them so that they can monetize with views, donations, sell some user data, cross patterns and user habits, profiling, and only god know what else.
Oh wait, does it sound like CLOWN agency honeypot? Yes, it does indeed,
Evspra what did instead? just asked for an answer, that could have even be simply 'yes we take some of our media material from there' or whatever else, but not a ban, 0 transparency, and that's what happened when you are faced against the wall with no way to escape or admit the truth
so again no, no hive mind, just some own logic, grazie
It does indeed. How it all starts before they lose the trust of the subscribers. Same with TD. You float around long enough you can see it happen clearly.
I'll up vote you my friend. I have serious issues with censoring information. This isn't Facebook, we can think for ourselves, but apparently the mods have decided to do the thinking for us.
The whole thing is dumb.
We should be able to post and choose to believe their stuff if we desire.
The argument about payments is a dumb one as well.
They don't ask for donations yet you can make one if you want. Yet Lin Wood and Sydney Powell ASK for donations and they aren't banned.
Selling merch...how else do they fund their site?
Banning GEORGE stuff is a patriots.win thing to do
Why not do the YouTube thing and allow GEORGE stuff posted with a disclaimer? It works well for them. Sarc
Did you miss the talk about how it was established consensus on GAW today that George News is not compromised but is now considered a grift. Check out the early posts from today Fren.
I read all about it and I was the one who asked if President Trump is also considered a paytroit for asking for donations in the main thread.
There's a lot of questions I have about GeorgeNews but apparently they are not being answered. Feel free to look through my posts and answer if you can.
Another thing to note is that Liz Crokin participated in one of the George live chats. She was one of the journalists who brought light to all the Epstein stuff and other child trafficking issues. Why? Like I said in another post. None of this adds up.
I'll add, if you know or follow the right photographers you can have access to photographs that aren't necessarily ever seen really by the public but are available on that photographer's social media channel/website. These photos don't make the cut because they usually aren't up to snuff. I'm referring to that shot of Trump in North Korea when everyone lost their shit trying to decode who this "George" guy was because obviously he "had" to have been the one that took said photograph.
It's sometimes easier to find photographers through places like Getty Images and then from there scrubbing through their social accounts or if they have a website they might have dumped batches of photos because not all Images will end up at a place like Getty.
Q said no outside comms and yet everyone is so quick to believe someone who drops a pin in a location associated with Trump. Are we that desperate?
I've had so many issues with "George" from the get go, from the half-assed logo design, the "location pins," the merch, typos, etc, but the minute people question the validity of George those people get accused of being just like the left? We need to be more discerning. I know we crave hopeium through information but we can't just blindly accept some random Youtube/Telegram account as gospel just because, ESPECIALLY because they drop pins in a location.
Nah, George ain't it and you guys have a hard time accepting this truth.
The fact is u/Evspra found George news is reposting things and what is much,much more suspecious - using extreme leftist owned infrastructure.
So u/italianrose : I guess banning it was maybe quite much,but as some info cannot be just marked as "probably not legit" by mods,mods are banning.
Should they ban whole things in such situation ? I am not mod luckily,so I don't have to argue about shortcomings of infrastructure we have here...
The fact IS: George News should not be so trusted it was.
Was choice about banning it apropriate ? I don't know.
From one side I deeply believe in free speech and suspect that banning them fully might generate problems because they should be researched still,but treated mostly like possible enemy disinformation. And as I know about disinformation a bit u/Evspra and we all shall remember one thing:
Arresting or killing proved enemy agent is last resort and worst choice counter-intelligence can do - done usually if other ways are closed. Having identified source of disinformation and observing it knowing who is it is quite good thing.
If George news is not reliable then we were able (or able still) to get some intel about their purposes if we will verify,verify and verify things they post,because such influence operation directed in us could give valuable clues about our enemies goals and plans about manipulating us.
From another side: We know they are probably not reliable. Despite having many visitors we not have enough willing manpower to research all things. And we have no marking for marking doubtful information automatically or by mods decision, so mods have to ban in most cases or those thing will be indistinguishable from more reliable research, able to cause problems. Probably more problems than trying to do counter-intelligence is worth.
Well... probably so well like you and me are peer reviewed really. :(
Your point. But weak one nevertheless...
Nobody does it probably.There are no list of proved/busted things, no list of theories with people responsible for mentioning it...
Fact it not exist is harmful for those who invigilate GA.win,but also for us all as well.
I doubt George News would be critical for Q operation however. Moreover: they tried to silence evspra after asking those question,and banned other people trying this as well. Ignoring him was not so dangerous if they had nothing to hide,and were not caring about profits or viewership.
Moreover. u/Evspra was doing heavy fantastic job as the mod. All things he claimed about George News were confirmed also by other users. So while it could be dangerous to have some deeply conspired enemy mole as mod, I doubt it is possible such person serving deep state would be u/Evspra, especially doubt about u/Evspra and his claims about George news being proof of such thing.Sorry, but your insinuations about u/Evspra are unfair, and even your approach looks more and more suspicious,as you were one of the users who were promoting George news quite long time ago.
What’s your actual info/truth? I think we believe in the same thing otherwise we wouldn’t be here. You not allowing counter arguments like in this case not allowing GEORGE is like censoring DJT45 during his debates. That’s what it seems like, and that’s acting exactly like the cabal. I thought this was free speech?
Now that the whole world knows about Q, even if they don't trust the plan, WE have to be extra careful with the impostors and infiltrators.
Some people think George.news are just Paytriots. We are still debating it. But imaging what nefarious people on the DS can do? Think about it for a moment: how many people who are willingly working for the DS have access to all kinds of non public information and photos? Reporters/Presstitutes, traitors on 3 letters agencies (CIA, FBI, DOJ), backstabber GOPs. Think of CIA Brennan, Obama and his people and the Military traitors. How many private photos do the people who were closed to Pres. Trump but were traitors have available? We do not really know if these people are white/black/gray hats, but how much non public info/photos do the following people have: Pence, Esper, Mattis. Do you think these people can not fake comms?
In fact, I am pretty sure I could fake comms for a while, if I wanted, until 'the nosy people of the great-awakening' unmasked me. Just quote Q drops, give people some hopium, quote the Bible and use the 17 a lot. And people will follow you like the people of Israel in the times of Moses following a golden calf.
How long were the likes of Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes, etc. being discussed on this board? How long was it before people really started calling for topics about them to be stopped? It went on for a damn long time even though it was so obvious they were actually paytriots with no inside knowledge whatsoever.
.....And after this one thing with George News. They are all of a sudden banned? Listen, I don't know if they are legit or not and neither do any of you. But jumping the gun like this is a bit premature. This just reeks of some shady shit. Use your logic here.
Except Evspra provided receipts, and when asked about lifting video's George news came out with the ban hammer.
Does that sound even remotely legit?
Oh, don't you try to confuse us with the facts! ?
Where are these receipts? This board has been comped for a year or more.
...their receipts are still interpretation "evidence".
Like, Ya'll do realize they have a press pass, right? They have SS vetting to be anywhere near the prez and to be able to live streams CPAC and his presidential speeches.
Also, considering by Evs' very own reasearch, they have been setup for years. Meaning, their internet connections were setup before everything went tits up.
Sooo....like to me that isn't convincing. I don't think anyone in 2017 would have imagined that in 2020 the deepness of corruption in seemingly apolitical functions such as net hosts and servers would be. So to retroactively call them shills when the territory pre-2019 was completely different is backwards attributing sinister intent by using the current political atmosphere.
Those are barely receipts if viewed with pre-2019 eyes.
Notice downvotes for not agreeing with hive mind.. sounds like Reddit/Cabal mentality
"People not willing to go along with your desperate delusions" = " cabal hive mind"
You appear to be highly susceptible to delusions; in this case, you seem to mistakenly believe that you are being remotely convincing here.
You emphasizing ‘remotely’ does not phase me. You are an internet person to me, you don’t give me love nor pay my bills.
Pray for DJT45 at any rate. I’m over this with you guys. We are in this for our children and DJT45 but downvoting does nothing when we are all fighting the same common cause.
I’m fighting for FREE SPEECH
Oh good grief; we've been over this before.
This board passionately believes in the Bill of Rights. And (nearly) everybody here is smart enough to know that "free speech" patently doesn't apply in a small, private closed group.
Demanding "FREE SPEECH" in such a forum is a ridiculous, suicidal demand to surrender the place to hecklers, trolls, confederates and chemtrailers.
None of this is novel or controversial. Stop it with your absurd, juvenile attempts to yell "FREE SPEECH" when your pet cause or safety blanket website is exposed and deprecated in a private forum.
We have moderators for a clear and obvious and entirely legitimate purpose. Bless our mods.
No actually there's no hive mind compagno, just that you have no clue of what happened and have 0 facts, if you really think George news is legit, look at their pages trackbacks and look how they will lovely accept and track each user that decides to follow them so that they can monetize with views, donations, sell some user data, cross patterns and user habits, profiling, and only god know what else. Oh wait, does it sound like CLOWN agency honeypot? Yes, it does indeed,
Evspra what did instead? just asked for an answer, that could have even be simply 'yes we take some of our media material from there' or whatever else, but not a ban, 0 transparency, and that's what happened when you are faced against the wall with no way to escape or admit the truth
so again no, no hive mind, just some own logic, grazie
It does indeed. How it all starts before they lose the trust of the subscribers. Same with TD. You float around long enough you can see it happen clearly.
I had these thoughts earlier but was afraid to say anything, it feels like TDW before Jan 06, this topic is causing a lot of friction today.
I'll up vote you my friend. I have serious issues with censoring information. This isn't Facebook, we can think for ourselves, but apparently the mods have decided to do the thinking for us.
The whole thing is dumb. We should be able to post and choose to believe their stuff if we desire. The argument about payments is a dumb one as well. They don't ask for donations yet you can make one if you want. Yet Lin Wood and Sydney Powell ASK for donations and they aren't banned. Selling merch...how else do they fund their site?
Banning GEORGE stuff is a patriots.win thing to do
Why not do the YouTube thing and allow GEORGE stuff posted with a disclaimer? It works well for them. Sarc
George is a grifting paytriot
Then I guess you'd say President Trump is a grifting paytriot for asking for donations and selling merchandise online to support President Trump?
Did you miss the talk about how it was established consensus on GAW today that George News is not compromised but is now considered a grift. Check out the early posts from today Fren.
I read all about it and I was the one who asked if President Trump is also considered a paytroit for asking for donations in the main thread.
There's a lot of questions I have about GeorgeNews but apparently they are not being answered. Feel free to look through my posts and answer if you can.
Cool
If I have something worthwhile I’ll let ya know
Nope
Then what's the difference?
Intention Fren, intention
Yes something doesn't smell right.
Another thing to note is that Liz Crokin participated in one of the George live chats. She was one of the journalists who brought light to all the Epstein stuff and other child trafficking issues. Why? Like I said in another post. None of this adds up.
Yes. Liz Crokin is as legit as it gets... Having her on gives good credibility
I'll add, if you know or follow the right photographers you can have access to photographs that aren't necessarily ever seen really by the public but are available on that photographer's social media channel/website. These photos don't make the cut because they usually aren't up to snuff. I'm referring to that shot of Trump in North Korea when everyone lost their shit trying to decode who this "George" guy was because obviously he "had" to have been the one that took said photograph.
It's sometimes easier to find photographers through places like Getty Images and then from there scrubbing through their social accounts or if they have a website they might have dumped batches of photos because not all Images will end up at a place like Getty.
Q said no outside comms and yet everyone is so quick to believe someone who drops a pin in a location associated with Trump. Are we that desperate?
I've had so many issues with "George" from the get go, from the half-assed logo design, the "location pins," the merch, typos, etc, but the minute people question the validity of George those people get accused of being just like the left? We need to be more discerning. I know we crave hopeium through information but we can't just blindly accept some random Youtube/Telegram account as gospel just because, ESPECIALLY because they drop pins in a location.
Nah, George ain't it and you guys have a hard time accepting this truth.
The fact is u/Evspra found George news is reposting things and what is much,much more suspecious - using extreme leftist owned infrastructure.
So u/italianrose : I guess banning it was maybe quite much,but as some info cannot be just marked as "probably not legit" by mods,mods are banning.
Should they ban whole things in such situation ? I am not mod luckily,so I don't have to argue about shortcomings of infrastructure we have here...
The fact IS: George News should not be so trusted it was.
Was choice about banning it apropriate ? I don't know.
From one side I deeply believe in free speech and suspect that banning them fully might generate problems because they should be researched still,but treated mostly like possible enemy disinformation. And as I know about disinformation a bit u/Evspra and we all shall remember one thing:
Arresting or killing proved enemy agent is last resort and worst choice counter-intelligence can do - done usually if other ways are closed. Having identified source of disinformation and observing it knowing who is it is quite good thing.
If George news is not reliable then we were able (or able still) to get some intel about their purposes if we will verify,verify and verify things they post,because such influence operation directed in us could give valuable clues about our enemies goals and plans about manipulating us.
From another side: We know they are probably not reliable. Despite having many visitors we not have enough willing manpower to research all things. And we have no marking for marking doubtful information automatically or by mods decision, so mods have to ban in most cases or those thing will be indistinguishable from more reliable research, able to cause problems. Probably more problems than trying to do counter-intelligence is worth.
Have you peer reviewed EVSPRA?
Well... probably so well like you and me are peer reviewed really. :( Your point. But weak one nevertheless...
Nobody does it probably.There are no list of proved/busted things, no list of theories with people responsible for mentioning it...
Fact it not exist is harmful for those who invigilate GA.win,but also for us all as well.
I doubt George News would be critical for Q operation however. Moreover: they tried to silence evspra after asking those question,and banned other people trying this as well. Ignoring him was not so dangerous if they had nothing to hide,and were not caring about profits or viewership.
Moreover. u/Evspra was doing heavy fantastic job as the mod. All things he claimed about George News were confirmed also by other users. So while it could be dangerous to have some deeply conspired enemy mole as mod, I doubt it is possible such person serving deep state would be u/Evspra, especially doubt about u/Evspra and his claims about George news being proof of such thing.Sorry, but your insinuations about u/Evspra are unfair, and even your approach looks more and more suspicious,as you were one of the users who were promoting George news quite long time ago.
If Evspra is a shill then I guess I love me some alpha shills now ?
don't be a parasite
if you truly believe george is legit, go make a .win for george
the only reason why parasites hook onto places like ga is bc they know their bs can only be sold on the backs of actual info/truth
What’s your actual info/truth? I think we believe in the same thing otherwise we wouldn’t be here. You not allowing counter arguments like in this case not allowing GEORGE is like censoring DJT45 during his debates. That’s what it seems like, and that’s acting exactly like the cabal. I thought this was free speech?
the truth is, your comment history shows you only joined to promote george as being legit
put your money where your mouth is and make a george win site if you really believe they are legit
you won't bc you know they are grifters, and for some reason, you are ok with being their mouth piece
Now that the whole world knows about Q, even if they don't trust the plan, WE have to be extra careful with the impostors and infiltrators.
Some people think George.news are just Paytriots. We are still debating it. But imaging what nefarious people on the DS can do? Think about it for a moment: how many people who are willingly working for the DS have access to all kinds of non public information and photos? Reporters/Presstitutes, traitors on 3 letters agencies (CIA, FBI, DOJ), backstabber GOPs. Think of CIA Brennan, Obama and his people and the Military traitors. How many private photos do the people who were closed to Pres. Trump but were traitors have available? We do not really know if these people are white/black/gray hats, but how much non public info/photos do the following people have: Pence, Esper, Mattis. Do you think these people can not fake comms?
In fact, I am pretty sure I could fake comms for a while, if I wanted, until 'the nosy people of the great-awakening' unmasked me. Just quote Q drops, give people some hopium, quote the Bible and use the 17 a lot. And people will follow you like the people of Israel in the times of Moses following a golden calf.
This is why: "No Outside Comms".
One other thing to add.
How long were the likes of Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes, etc. being discussed on this board? How long was it before people really started calling for topics about them to be stopped? It went on for a damn long time even though it was so obvious they were actually paytriots with no inside knowledge whatsoever.
.....And after this one thing with George News. They are all of a sudden banned? Listen, I don't know if they are legit or not and neither do any of you. But jumping the gun like this is a bit premature. This just reeks of some shady shit. Use your logic here.
Have you peer reviewed EVSPRA or going off word
They never drop any content though
No outside comms.
Q