The PCR test, if that's what was used as a "covid test" is a very poor test for a virus. It has a couple technical issues I won't get into here (unless desired) but the bottom line is, its prone to false positives (to the extreme).
Worse though, if she tested positive already (and had already contracted the virus), getting the shot would do her zero good and potentially a lot of harm. Putting such an attack on the immune system (what the "vaccine" does) when it is already under stress from the virus itself has to be a crime. I can't imagine any doctor would know so little about immunology that they would allow that.
If she had in fact already contracted the virus (it is more likely it was a false positive tbh) then her immune system had already taken care of the actual virus making her almost certainly immune to a future attack. Getting the vaccine in that case is a useless endeavor. As a nurse she should have known that.
I swear, they teach nothing about cell and molecular biology or even virology and immunology to pre-med students or M.D.s. The entire pre-med degree needs to be thrown out the window (I knew a ton of pre-med in my undergrad schooling, almost all of them idiots in real biology). We should make all pre-med get a real biology degree.
That rant aside, the PCR test is itself an absolutely awful test for a viral infection. That is not its intended purpose even in the best of circumstances. But when you cycle it up (as the WHO protocol suggests), because of how PCR works it is almost guaranteed to be a false positive. It is utterly useless as a viral test. The only logical conclusion one can make about it being used in this capacity is that someone wanted there to be a lot of (false) positive tests.
Let her know she should disregard all PCR tests, no matter what the outcome. An antibody test is more useful (though I'd have to see the protocol they are using to be sure about that).
Evidence suggests the protein used for the "vaccines" is a coat protein on the surface of the SARS-cov-2 virus. It is imo an awful technology for several reasons I have laid out in other places in detail, but there is no credible evidence to support the claim that it "has nothing to do with any coronavirus" that I have seen (and I have looked a lot). I welcome any evidence you wish to provide for that assertion and I can vet it.
I looked up the protocols used by a couple of different tests of a SARS-cov-2 lateral flow immunochromatographic assays. There is no way to know for certain if it is the same assay, but I will assume yes. They used PCR positive samples to verify the results, which makes it problematic, but it was a reasonably low PCR cycle so it could be worse.
The test results were not great. The average agreement was around 80%. That suggests around a one in five chance of disagreement between a low cycle PCR test and the lateral flow assays tested. No real statistical conclusions can be made from this, but I can guesstimate a one in twenty chance of being positive on both and not having the virus (assuming the PCR test is 25 cycles or less).
If PCR test taken is a higher cycle (per the WHO protocol) that would be closer to a one in five chance of a false positive for the lateral flow assay for both. Maybe one in ten. I trust the lateral flow assay more than the PCR for this purpose, but without a verification process other than PCR its really an unknown.
First off the tests are junk. If you test a tire it can come back positive. True story.
Sadly it looks like it was a plan to get everyone to take the shot. Why everyone needs it is the question. If the tests are junk and the virus is not nearly as deadly as advertised you have to ask why they did it? It wasn’t for our election was it? Or was It was to get everyone to take the shot?
No coming back now. Once you get the mark of the beast you’re a “transhuman”.
For something that you can beat with your immune system.
There are like 5 genz coworkers in my office that went and get tested.
RESULTS COME BACK POSITIVE! They were panicking, one wanted to moved out of their apartment since they don't want it to spread LMAO.
And then they went and get tested again....come back Negative.
ROFL, mfw they still think this Virus is legitimate.
mRNA Jab directs your cells to manufacture the Covid viral spike proteins. The spike proteins are what triggers your immune system to manufacture Covid antibodies.
In essence, it turns your body into the vaccine factory.
The test is likely detecting the viral spike proteins your body has manufactured.
Symptoms? If not, false positive. What Cycle Threshold was used for test? Anything over 25 to 30 is most likely false positive. Especially if no symptoms.
That sucks. With horror stories like this, people in australia getting a "false positive" HIV test after the jab and the studies showing mRNA wackcine can block the proteins that help you fight cancer, I'd never in a million years submit to the shot.
I spoke to one of my school run buddies this morning. She got ill with the virus last year, around March, at a similar time to me.
She proudly tells me that she's had the "vaccine", but it did make her ill.
"But you are immune already" I said. She says she had a negative immunity test and that was good enough for her to justify the vaccine, even though they told her that the immunity test wouldn't reach past six months ago.
Anyway, my face fell at all of this. She has asthma and she doesn't want the catch the virus she's already had.
I asked her if it was informed consent.
"Oh yes, they told me all about it"
Not the bit about the pathogenic priming.
I didn't explain any further. I didn't want to ruin her day, but I did park my car right outside the school. It says "Don't trust the vax" on the back.
Yep, it's not a "theory" it's real. Hope it doesn't cause her irreparable harm.
The PCR test, if that's what was used as a "covid test" is a very poor test for a virus. It has a couple technical issues I won't get into here (unless desired) but the bottom line is, its prone to false positives (to the extreme).
Worse though, if she tested positive already (and had already contracted the virus), getting the shot would do her zero good and potentially a lot of harm. Putting such an attack on the immune system (what the "vaccine" does) when it is already under stress from the virus itself has to be a crime. I can't imagine any doctor would know so little about immunology that they would allow that.
Stuff like this really pisses me off.
If she had in fact already contracted the virus (it is more likely it was a false positive tbh) then her immune system had already taken care of the actual virus making her almost certainly immune to a future attack. Getting the vaccine in that case is a useless endeavor. As a nurse she should have known that.
I swear, they teach nothing about cell and molecular biology or even virology and immunology to pre-med students or M.D.s. The entire pre-med degree needs to be thrown out the window (I knew a ton of pre-med in my undergrad schooling, almost all of them idiots in real biology). We should make all pre-med get a real biology degree.
That rant aside, the PCR test is itself an absolutely awful test for a viral infection. That is not its intended purpose even in the best of circumstances. But when you cycle it up (as the WHO protocol suggests), because of how PCR works it is almost guaranteed to be a false positive. It is utterly useless as a viral test. The only logical conclusion one can make about it being used in this capacity is that someone wanted there to be a lot of (false) positive tests.
Let her know she should disregard all PCR tests, no matter what the outcome. An antibody test is more useful (though I'd have to see the protocol they are using to be sure about that).
That because the injection has nothing to do with any coronavirus
Evidence suggests the protein used for the "vaccines" is a coat protein on the surface of the SARS-cov-2 virus. It is imo an awful technology for several reasons I have laid out in other places in detail, but there is no credible evidence to support the claim that it "has nothing to do with any coronavirus" that I have seen (and I have looked a lot). I welcome any evidence you wish to provide for that assertion and I can vet it.
I just noticed you said she tested positive on a lateral flow test. I'm going to try to find the protocol for that to see if it is meaningful.
I looked up the protocols used by a couple of different tests of a SARS-cov-2 lateral flow immunochromatographic assays. There is no way to know for certain if it is the same assay, but I will assume yes. They used PCR positive samples to verify the results, which makes it problematic, but it was a reasonably low PCR cycle so it could be worse.
The test results were not great. The average agreement was around 80%. That suggests around a one in five chance of disagreement between a low cycle PCR test and the lateral flow assays tested. No real statistical conclusions can be made from this, but I can guesstimate a one in twenty chance of being positive on both and not having the virus (assuming the PCR test is 25 cycles or less).
If PCR test taken is a higher cycle (per the WHO protocol) that would be closer to a one in five chance of a false positive for the lateral flow assay for both. Maybe one in ten. I trust the lateral flow assay more than the PCR for this purpose, but without a verification process other than PCR its really an unknown.
No mask, no vax, no test, no problem.
First off the tests are junk. If you test a tire it can come back positive. True story. Sadly it looks like it was a plan to get everyone to take the shot. Why everyone needs it is the question. If the tests are junk and the virus is not nearly as deadly as advertised you have to ask why they did it? It wasn’t for our election was it? Or was It was to get everyone to take the shot? No coming back now. Once you get the mark of the beast you’re a “transhuman”.
"get tested"
For something that you can beat with your immune system. There are like 5 genz coworkers in my office that went and get tested. RESULTS COME BACK POSITIVE! They were panicking, one wanted to moved out of their apartment since they don't want it to spread LMAO.
And then they went and get tested again....come back Negative.
ROFL, mfw they still think this Virus is legitimate.
mRNA Jab directs your cells to manufacture the Covid viral spike proteins. The spike proteins are what triggers your immune system to manufacture Covid antibodies.
In essence, it turns your body into the vaccine factory.
The test is likely detecting the viral spike proteins your body has manufactured.
Symptoms? If not, false positive. What Cycle Threshold was used for test? Anything over 25 to 30 is most likely false positive. Especially if no symptoms.
Well, when one put oneself forward to be a medical guinea pig, you will never know what the effects will be, short-term or long-term.
That sucks. With horror stories like this, people in australia getting a "false positive" HIV test after the jab and the studies showing mRNA wackcine can block the proteins that help you fight cancer, I'd never in a million years submit to the shot.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-03-02-scientists-discover-mrna-inactivates-tumor-suppressing-proteins.html#
I'm sorry to hear that man.
It's in the vaccine... hello
I wonder if the covid one gets from injection is contagious?
I spoke to one of my school run buddies this morning. She got ill with the virus last year, around March, at a similar time to me.
She proudly tells me that she's had the "vaccine", but it did make her ill.
"But you are immune already" I said. She says she had a negative immunity test and that was good enough for her to justify the vaccine, even though they told her that the immunity test wouldn't reach past six months ago.
Anyway, my face fell at all of this. She has asthma and she doesn't want the catch the virus she's already had.
I asked her if it was informed consent.
"Oh yes, they told me all about it"
Not the bit about the pathogenic priming.
I didn't explain any further. I didn't want to ruin her day, but I did park my car right outside the school. It says "Don't trust the vax" on the back.
Why are people not streetwise?
People want to yrust their authority. They dont know the darkness yhey put their faith in. When everything hits, it will become very well known.
You should test positive after the jabs. Your body is creating the RNA signature that the Covid tests look for.
And if you tested positive before the jabs, maybe was a false positive (unless you were sick).
Coke, diet coke, sprite, papayas, kiwis and goats all tested positive too.
No problem. I won't be consuming any of those. (Well, maybe a hank of goat.)
Pcr tests are a fraud to be used the way they are mate.
I'll just leave this here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDrtG7Td-YU