An interesting aspect of all these sealed cases to me is no leaks. Many prosecutors/ judges/ attorneys have to be involved and not one leak of a big name case. That in itself is puzzling.
Universities. Harvard and MIT have plenty of ties to Epstein and the CIA. Also Boston dynamics might have some dark deals. I’m sure there are a lot more but the universities are likely a big part of it.
Guam is very corrupt and full of US military. I've done business with customers in Guam before, they have insane import taxes even on items coming from mainland US. It's proximity to the Asian continent likely acts as a rally point for "trading certain items."
Gotta get the ones I'm foreign countries first before they get the ones here and word gets out.
If they started with the ones here first, word got out and alerted the criminal actors outside our nation, imagine how much more work it'd be to track all of em down.
So part of the hold up could be that we don't have the room to incarcerate this many individuals. One theory I heard is that FEMA camps would be utilized for this purpose but since those facilities we not originally designed to hold people against their will they would all need modification and that takes time. I'm not making any claims...just trying to figure out what we are waiting for and this is the most likely scenario I can come up with. Do we agree? Other opinions are welcome.
Damn, I went into that with an open mind, not having been a huge follower of this “sealed indictments” theory. And your link turned out to be one of the most laughably unconvincing deboonkings I’ve seen in a long time. Essentially what we “learn” is:
Those “Qanons” be cray-cray!
A lot of these are actually “surveillance and wiretap requests” (ok... sounds good to me ?)
The sealed indictment theory is super crazy... but Robert Mueller currently has a bunch of them ready to go for his impending takedown of Trump and family and associates ?
“63,000 sealed indictments”, “63,000 sealed indictments”. “63,000 sealed indictments” (Ok, if that number, granting many might indeed be wiretap and surveillance requests, seemed unexceptional to the author, how about 234,420 now??)
Again, I’m not sold on this “sealed indictment” theory. But nobody should see that link from whoever “Matt Rotchild” is, claiming to be a debunk of the “sealed indictments” theory, and think it’s anything but junk. It’s total junk.
I'm pretty embarrassed to say this, but I don't understand this sealed indictment thing AT ALL. And I hate to be all low effort, and not do my own research, but I must cede to time limitations here. Hat in hand... Could you ELI5? Just a link to something that explains it in Q Theory on a surface level would be a great start for me.
I singled you out, u/basedinfact because I respect what you post, and I feel like you might throw me a bone after this long fking day. No homo.
Thanks for the compliment, but beyond what I noted, I have essentially zero knowledge of this issue.
My post wasn't about the validity of the sealed indictments theory (it sure sounds epically awesome, I'll at least give it that!), as I've only seen it referenced on the periphery and (perhaps like you) didn't care enough to give it too much time. If it's a thing, yay! If it's not a thing, ?♂️.
Rather, my post was simply about the laughable invalidity of that debooonking effort that one commenter linked to. I clicked it and read it (again, perhaps like you) to learn from both sides in order to be able to critically evaluate whether all these sealed indictments constituted an area of interest that I, someone who is very eager to see the Pedo-Commie Cabal go down for their crimes, might want to dig deeper into. So, as I noted, I started reading that with an open mind, and its debooonking attempt was so ineffective that I'm now more inclined to believe that the many, many sealed indictments is a signal of an onslaught of prosecutions based on surveillance evidence.
But nope, sorry again, I have nothing further to impart beyond the fact that I was nudged over towards the "sealed indictments" conspiracy side solely by dint of a flailing rebuttal on the other side.
Great response and all your "(probably like you)" replies are 100% accurate. Sounds like we're in exactly the same boat. Lol.
It's weird, because I stumbled across that Rothschild debunk a little while ago, out of nowhere, and had the exact same reaction. I'm more curious about it all as a result than before I read it. It's a laughable defense.
I doubt I'm going to deliberately dig more, there's only so much time in the day. If someone puts together a really nice, comprehensive post about it, I'm sure we'll both see it and read it heh.
An interesting aspect of all these sealed cases to me is no leaks. Many prosecutors/ judges/ attorneys have to be involved and not one leak of a big name case. That in itself is puzzling.
Thanks for pointing that out! That leads me to believe only Durham and maybe a handful of people know about all those cases.
Just another hint who is really in control and it is not Biden’s DOJ
The crazy one is Massachusetts, these numbers aren't per capita and yet they have a large number for a small state. Wonder what's going on there?
Judge was just convicted of pedofilia from there I believe. Or maybe that was Maryland... Now I gotta go look for sauce.
Universities. Harvard and MIT have plenty of ties to Epstein and the CIA. Also Boston dynamics might have some dark deals. I’m sure there are a lot more but the universities are likely a big part of it.
Florida is unexpectedly wholesome given it's the 3rd most populated state....
Guam has more than Oregon.....what are those Guamanians up to???
Guam is very corrupt and full of US military. I've done business with customers in Guam before, they have insane import taxes even on items coming from mainland US. It's proximity to the Asian continent likely acts as a rally point for "trading certain items."
Good to know! Thanks, fren!
Watch Cuomo and Whitmer. Tides are turning frEinD
Wyoming just vibin like...Ya we barely got anybody here...
Gotta get the ones I'm foreign countries first before they get the ones here and word gets out.
If they started with the ones here first, word got out and alerted the criminal actors outside our nation, imagine how much more work it'd be to track all of em down.
The Oregon number is too damn low!
(you’ll just have to visualize an accompanying picture of “The Rent Is Too Damn High” guy yourselves)
were gonna need a shitload of dimes
So part of the hold up could be that we don't have the room to incarcerate this many individuals. One theory I heard is that FEMA camps would be utilized for this purpose but since those facilities we not originally designed to hold people against their will they would all need modification and that takes time. I'm not making any claims...just trying to figure out what we are waiting for and this is the most likely scenario I can come up with. Do we agree? Other opinions are welcome.
Kid by the side of the road I believe he says up to 99 people not 39 per sealed case. Hmmm
Damn, I went into that with an open mind, not having been a huge follower of this “sealed indictments” theory. And your link turned out to be one of the most laughably unconvincing deboonkings I’ve seen in a long time. Essentially what we “learn” is:
Again, I’m not sold on this “sealed indictment” theory. But nobody should see that link from whoever “Matt Rotchild” is, claiming to be a debunk of the “sealed indictments” theory, and think it’s anything but junk. It’s total junk.
I'm pretty embarrassed to say this, but I don't understand this sealed indictment thing AT ALL. And I hate to be all low effort, and not do my own research, but I must cede to time limitations here. Hat in hand... Could you ELI5? Just a link to something that explains it in Q Theory on a surface level would be a great start for me.
I singled you out, u/basedinfact because I respect what you post, and I feel like you might throw me a bone after this long fking day. No homo.
Thanks in advance. ?
Thanks for the compliment, but beyond what I noted, I have essentially zero knowledge of this issue.
My post wasn't about the validity of the sealed indictments theory (it sure sounds epically awesome, I'll at least give it that!), as I've only seen it referenced on the periphery and (perhaps like you) didn't care enough to give it too much time. If it's a thing, yay! If it's not a thing, ?♂️.
Rather, my post was simply about the laughable invalidity of that debooonking effort that one commenter linked to. I clicked it and read it (again, perhaps like you) to learn from both sides in order to be able to critically evaluate whether all these sealed indictments constituted an area of interest that I, someone who is very eager to see the Pedo-Commie Cabal go down for their crimes, might want to dig deeper into. So, as I noted, I started reading that with an open mind, and its debooonking attempt was so ineffective that I'm now more inclined to believe that the many, many sealed indictments is a signal of an onslaught of prosecutions based on surveillance evidence.
But nope, sorry again, I have nothing further to impart beyond the fact that I was nudged over towards the "sealed indictments" conspiracy side solely by dint of a flailing rebuttal on the other side.
If you discover more, totally let me know!
Great response and all your "(probably like you)" replies are 100% accurate. Sounds like we're in exactly the same boat. Lol.
It's weird, because I stumbled across that Rothschild debunk a little while ago, out of nowhere, and had the exact same reaction. I'm more curious about it all as a result than before I read it. It's a laughable defense.
I doubt I'm going to deliberately dig more, there's only so much time in the day. If someone puts together a really nice, comprehensive post about it, I'm sure we'll both see it and read it heh.
Thanks for the response!
Ive been meaning to ask, but why were you programmed to be so damn good at Super Smash Bros? Lol, miss playing that game.