I've been watching the HBO documentary about Q and there are some things I was curious about as I had not heard this info before. I was not aware that there are some people under the impression that the current Q we follow may not be the original Q. What are your guys thoughts on this and why? Is there any proof that this Q is the same as the original Q and if so, what? Are we just taking Codemonkey's word for it (though that doesn't sound like something the anons I've come to know would do)?
Another question I had is what are your opinions on Fred/Jim/Ron? I do not like how Fred seemed to flip flop on his opinions about 8kun once he quit/was fired. And Jim seems like a shady character. They all do, honestly. The way the Doc is filmed or perhaps it's the way they all are acting, it's almost as if this whole Q thing is a game to them. Something that drives publicity to their site, and nothing more. I'm actually really surprised that this is who runs the board the almighty Q posts on. Any thoughts/opinions/sauce is greatly appreciated.
As you asked for an opinion, I never trusted CodeMonkeyZ (Ron) or any other member of the Watkins family. I don't trust 11th hour heroes. If people want to ignore the dichotomy of a man who thrust himself into the post election narrative, then attempts to walk away from it all in pursuit of a quiet life only to resurface on an HBO documentary - that's entirely up to them.
Furthermore, the HBO documentary really attempts to undermine Q and MAGA supporters, not via the questioning or even the somewhat scattershot interpretations (to be fair, on that front, it would be hard to maintain a "balance" as a filmmaker) but does so more on the optics... They all look like a bunch of dorks and losers.
A normie would watch that and conclude that the movement is "headed" by a bunch of people who wish they had enough friends to form a raiding party for a game of WoW. That sounds horrid but I very much got the impression that's what they were going for.
I totally agree. I was waiting to see some incredible autists being interviewed on camera. I was greatly disappointed. See my previous comment about the doc being a giant larp.
The filmmaker admitted to loving Comet Ping Pong.
Case closed.
Sauce?
Sauce
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't he just interviewed for the Doc, and not one of the creators? Not saying that his enjoyment of Comet Pink Pong isn't wrong, but I don't think the makers of the Doc have been involved in Pizzagate (that I know of).
the show needs to focus on q drops and proofs , not these 3 dorks
The common belief amongst Anons was that there were multiple people as part of the Q team, and each person posted certain posts and then handed off to the next one. But its all part of Q.
As for Fred/Jim/Ron - they are the least relevant to Q even though this documentary focuses only on them. The real people were the Anons and Bakers who put together the map from the Q posts. The first 2 episodes pretty much focused only on 8kun and its history and hardly anything on Q. I assume 3 and 4 are the same.
After watching the 4 episodes released so far, I identified some apparently divergent lines in this doc:
I believe these last 2 lines are deceptions on purpose as well (just like the marketing, LOL):
Dunno, maybe the doc is a "normie friendly" way to get them to research and discover by themselves about the Why's.
Plus in a personal note, I'm digging the characters so far, specially the Watkins. Man, both dad and son are so unique and charismatic in camera...Like they're acting in a movie :P
I'm new to Q. I hated this doc at the first episode when they started talking about pizzagate, like not mentioning Podestas emails that are now public knowledge.
They seem to tryin to tell the tale of Q, but then leave out very relevant and crucial information that gives the movement worth.
I've watched 2 episodes, and I'm now done.
I was super interested after the first and second episodes. I knew right off the bat they weren't going to go into deep Q drop info, but I was fascinated because it told me a history I knew nothing about and couldn't find on the internet (although perhaps that is my fault) such as the origins of 8kun, 4chan and such. It was informative at the beginning for a newbie like me because I did not know about the original players such as Paul Fuhrber etc. But after episodes 3 and 4 I realize it's basically a big larp. It's discrediting Q under the guise of researching/documenting Q. I'm still going to finish it out because at this point I'm starved for Q anything. But I see it for what it is and not hoping for anything more.
HBO thinks Q has been identified - they’re wrong. We follow a Q who has not communicated in months.
This is similar to the Bible and Church issue we see (although the Bible we have was translated who knows how many times by people with who knows what knowledge or intentions - at least it seems we have the unaltered Q posts): one canon - many interpretations that result.
In general I think we need to focus on Q posts and doing our own research. I think that was Q’s whole purpose - give us a sneak peek behind the curtain to motivate us to think critically and research. No datefagging, no posts for social credit (upvotes), just focus on finding truth.
I don't have answers, but I'll post for visibility. Maybe someone else has a better idea.
They all seem a bit shady, don’t they? I remember the change in Q posts going from asking questions to making statements and posting ”fillers”, posts that was at least seemingly meaningless. People were discussing Q being taken over, but to me the ultimate Q proof was Trump not distancing himself from the movement, and still is.
If there is a plan, and I belive there is, we will know eventually. Sooner rather than later, but I belive there will be a president Kamala first. Biden is a piece of shit, but essentially people see him as a grandpa that lost his way. Harris is easier to despise. She will wake up the voters to what they have done. I hope.
There was an interesting tidbit in episode four about IP adresses linked to Q posts, I made a post about it that seemed to have been shadowbanned. Even more interesting, my tinfoil hat is glowing. ??
I have been told Kamala (aka Amelak) will "receive the position but not the power"....I have been told this for a year now....
Blessings!
The first 60 drops were not signed by Q. I doubt Fred/Jim/Ron know anything about Q, they provided a service that Q exploited. At most they may have talked about security aspects of the sites but they have no idea who Q is.
That makes sense. And it bothers me that Fred is shady about the origins of his giant blue Q. At first they made it seem like Q was admitting to sending it. But then changed the story into something else I cant recall at the moment.
Fred is a POS. The only redpill from this shit show would be showing how our government and the left want to crnsor everything. Problem is many normies agree with these ideas due to low information or ignorance. The movie portrays Q as Child's game and not the tool it really is.
I follow Q because Trump, Scavino, Pompeo continue to keep me involved with it. The Watkins clan mean nothing.