I don't know. This reads like the same kind of propaganda the liberals try to push. I'm not saying people should rush out and get the vax and i certainly have no intention of doing so because it's experimental and bad things are bound to, and have happened. But I take exception with his statement that those who have been vaccinated have 2 years to live, max. It's an experimental vaccine that has not been around long enough to know the projected outcome of two years. Prophetic statements like that need to be backed up with some science IMO. Not knocking you for posting just saying I'm not buying into the sky is falling narrative either. The more info that's out there the better people can determine what's right for them.
This experimental vaccine was already done on animal subjects. They had been working on it since the sars outbreak which is also covid. ALL THE ANIMALS TESTED DIED.
Doesn't it seem a little bit disturbing that they are giving people a "vaccine" of the same type that killed all the animals in tests for a previous vaccine for another coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1, which is 80% identical to Covid-19)? And that Pfizer is now saying it will be 2023 before it has long-term test data?
Does anybody see anything in this scenario that makes them think we should give Pfizer, Moderna, Gates, Fauci et al. the benefit of the doubt?
If it's any consolation there have been quite a few tests back to the sixties. While it's true that all the test animals died, it was from several different concoctions. You can rest assured no animals died in the making of the Covidiot Vax
I agree that what was in the blurb was not in the article, but what was in the article was plenty terrifying enough. Read all the way to the end where he starts talking about depopulation like Russia and China....
I don't know. This reads like the same kind of propaganda the liberals try to push. I'm not saying people should rush out and get the vax and i certainly have no intention of doing so because it's experimental and bad things are bound to, and have happened. But I take exception with his statement that those who have been vaccinated have 2 years to live, max. It's an experimental vaccine that has not been around long enough to know the projected outcome of two years. Prophetic statements like that need to be backed up with some science IMO. Not knocking you for posting just saying I'm not buying into the sky is falling narrative either. The more info that's out there the better people can determine what's right for them.
This experimental vaccine was already done on animal subjects. They had been working on it since the sars outbreak which is also covid. ALL THE ANIMALS TESTED DIED.
Doesn't it seem a little bit disturbing that they are giving people a "vaccine" of the same type that killed all the animals in tests for a previous vaccine for another coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1, which is 80% identical to Covid-19)? And that Pfizer is now saying it will be 2023 before it has long-term test data?
Does anybody see anything in this scenario that makes them think we should give Pfizer, Moderna, Gates, Fauci et al. the benefit of the doubt?
If it's any consolation there have been quite a few tests back to the sixties. While it's true that all the test animals died, it was from several different concoctions. You can rest assured no animals died in the making of the Covidiot Vax
If by rest assured you mean, be terrified for your lives
And no animals died meaning ALL OF THEM, then yes, you’re probably right.
No animals died because no animal testing was done. Only humans have been tested on with these new "vaccines" in order to speed it up for public use.
No animals died because they didnt test it on animals. They are testing it on us. On a similar attempt at a sars vax ALL the animals died.
They know exactly what its supposed to do. This was always to depopulate the earth.
Bill Gates said exactly that in 2011 yet are still rushing out and getting these jabs funded by him. It's utter madness.
Agree. The more information available the better.
I agree that what was in the blurb was not in the article, but what was in the article was plenty terrifying enough. Read all the way to the end where he starts talking about depopulation like Russia and China....
Any whontakes it has killed themselves