There are still many based White Hats in the Church, they are not all corrupt. Vigano is a great example. Also, Father Altman, Father Calloway, Cardinal Burke, (all of which I have personally met and can attest to their holiness), and Father Mark Goring are amazing as well! There are many waking up and fighting back. We will win!
Gerbert was the magic pope. He was the first French pope, and the pope roughly halfway between Jesus of Nazerath and us. But really, he reintroduced Europe to a lot of lost knowledge.
The pope (literally all of them) are the definition of an anti christ. They claim to be the voice of Jesus Christ on Earth, while disregarding every single thing he taught and commanded. Like to call no man your father upon this earth, and to beware of the pharisees who went around in long flowing robes. To not make images and bow down to idols, like their blasphemous pictures of some long haired, faggoty looking effeminate pictures that they call Jesus, and their Mary statues. Read Isiah, where he talks about the children of Israel baking cakes to their false God they called the queen of heaven. Which is what they call Mary. The catholic church is wicked to the core, since the day it was founded.
John Paul 2nd brought more people to Christ than all of America's evangelicals combined. Read into his works with Latin America. John Paul 2nd actively fought liberalism, socialism, and identity politics. When he died , several liberal rags wrote hit pieces against him.
Words are one thing, actions are another. Like Vigano does as a cardinal, Paul was a pope who fought to preserve the freedoms given to us by an era of true divinity.
Even oir forim name the great awakening, reflects that
That is Inanna with Babylonian origins that dates back to the 17th century BC while Mary did not give birth to Jesus till around 4 BC. They are not the same my man, google this yourself to see.
"The Church"... as in, the body of Christians, has been in trouble since he handed the keys to a human being. The Old and New testament is full of stories that showcase true human nature: we reject God. From that point.... absolute sh*tshow follows.
As Christians, we have clear instructions from Jesus: [44] But I say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you: [45] That you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust. Matthew 5:44-45
This means we pray for the bad popes, the pedophiles, etc. SO hard to do, and I struggle with it every day...
There will always be bad people everywhere, even in the most sacred and holy of places, because sin never takes a rest and every human on earth is vulnerable. The only exceptions were Jesus, his mother Mary, and even his adoptive father Joseph who was given special blessings to resist temptation and sin.
Other than those 3 everyone else is going to commit sin, no matter how small, and that includes popes and bishops and cardinals and priests. Not saying it's okay, it's not, but Jesus died for our sins, past and present and future, so that we might confess those sins and follow Him once again and have eternal life. So, as my own mother says, until death, nothing is settled, and even the worst villains still have a shot at righting themselves, and we must pray for them the most.
That's your interpretation of the Bible. Whether it is a misinterpretation or not is between you and God.
Keep in mind that the the Codex Vaticanus (the best copy of the Latin Vulgate Bible, which is in practice what the Catholic church has used) and Textus Receptus (the oldest copy of the Protestant Bible but derived from the greek) can be quite different and were based on the judgement of different people (Jerome and Erasmus in this case).
Why? The Receptus was derived from the Greek, and the Vaticanus was derived from the Vulgate (which was derived from Hebrew sources). Now if you consider the Coptic and things like the Syriac church there is even more variation. I would say newer versions of the Bible tend to actually be more 'correct' because there is simply more versions of older scripts to compare against, and people have better command of ancient Hebrew and Greek.
Some of the nuance is lost in translation (for example, "our father" and "our Father in Heaven"). Sometimes in for example, in Hebrew they might have been the same word. In Greek they may have been different. Latin changed a lot from what the Romans spoke from Jesus' time to the Vulgate because of the introduction of barbarian words. Note that translation to other languages (for example English) will come with even more caveats - some of the earlier ones, for example, the King James Version, had a lot of defects. I would study the The New Oxford Annotated Bible, it's great.
Personally I would not read things so literally without studying with a Rosetta Stone. You gotta see the full picture if you are so critical of other people under Jesus' flock. I think modern versions are interesting because over time people have been able to digitize more versions of the Bible, even ancient versions, and compare them against each other. These days people do it with computers since more and more of the manuscripts are online.
And this is just the New Testament, the Old Testament has even more variation (and similarities) especially if you trace back to the Cuneiform/Aramaic and the starts of Semitic language. I think the biggest part of the modern age (last 20 years) has been the explosion of papyrus and the ability to process and translate between languages using computers, maybe the tower of babel in reverse.
Dude, actually read up and understand the Catholic faith before you start blasting lies which you know are false. We DON'T worship statues, we DON'T worship Mary, we are NOT pagans. This is the easiest stuff to research if you put 2 minutes into it.
And as for the "effeminate pictures that they call Jesus" I have no idea what you're talking about. We as the Church didn't make those images, independent artists did. And whether people choose to have them in their houses is up to them, but we don't have pictures of Jesus like that in churches, they are far more intricate than that.
Find me examples of existing based FBI members. We can find based people all throughout the Catholic Church speaking out (which is a very different kind of organization anyways) which is enough to differentiate the two.
Thank you for reposting Absp Vigano's letter to the President. He is a holy man who is fighting a great battle. His words are a powerful reminder of the evil we are up against. They have planned it down to the smallest detail with sustainable communities, road diets, and the passports. I will not cave in to them. In my selfishness, I think of my family but berate myself for not praying hard for the welfare of all families in the world.
That letter is one of the first things that really got my attention. Senior clergy in the catholic faith tend to be stubbornly apolitical. Senior clergy openly calling out the Pope in Catholicism is a big deal. Throughout history, people have died for less.
Then I noticed religious groups showing up at Trump rallies and parades like the Amish and Habited Nuns. Never seen that before. Again, religious groups that historically don't get political.
Personally, I developed a strong sense that something different, something consequential, something beyond politics was going on. Nothing that has happened since that day, has me wavering from that belief.
This is a really good analysis. Catholic clergy are historically anti political, only speaking out if the left forces their hand (cough James Martin cough) or if there is an existential threat against the church. The Nuns, Vigineo, now even the Bishops Conference is speaking out. It’s bigger than politics.
TY Fren. Non-practicing but 10 years Catholic School, for which I am ultimately thankful.
So many strange things lining up, too many. Even the Pope's conduct. Public endorsement of Globo-Homo agenda, the Great Reset and the CCP. WTF is that?
Saw video of Pope physically attack (grab and repeatedly slap hand) Chinese woman in St. Peter's Square when she reached out to him. Saw real anger in his eyes. Not the Holy Father I would expect.
This "Pope" is definitely not the real Pope, or not a legitimate one anyway. When Benedict XVI "resigned" I knew something was up, because a pope hadn't done that in CENTURIES. This was a big deal. And then when Bergoglio (Francis) was chosen, and all the atheist and anti-Christian and anti-Catholic people I knew were praising him immediately for being more "worldly" and more "with the times" I knew something was VERY wrong. If the world was beginning to approve of the Church it wasn't because the world was getting more Christian, it was because the Church was getting more worldly.
Benedict XVI was not a perfect man or pope either, and he has many secrets he's still holding, but in comparison to the depravity of pachamama-idol-worshiping-Bergoglio, Benedict was extremely conservative.
I recommend reading "Infiltration" by Dr. Taylor Marshall a devout Traditional Catholic. It highlights all the internal corruption of the Church, where it started, who's behind it, who's doing what right now. It's fantastic. Highly recommend.
Do you happen to subscribe to Taylor Marshall's YT? On Holy Saturday I got a notification he was live with the title 'Pope Francis has died'. I was 20 min late seeing it and by that time the video was removed. The video would have been posted around 2pm EST, during the Easter Vigil mass at the Vatican. I took a screenshot of the notification. Very odd.
I do watch it, love it, love his sassyness and saltiness towards the Vatican. But I was busy all day Holy Saturday so I never checked my notifications. I never knew about that video, I have no idea what that's about.
Not really sure what Benedict's real plan is. I think he was forced to resign, by the black hats (freemasons) in the Church, and there were so many he was powerless to stop it. I don't blame him for this situation, all this mess was thrown into his lap the moment he became pope. This has been going on for centuries, but only in the past 80-100 years has it been really bad and getting worse.
I can only hope that Benedict does the right thing and reveals the truth before he goes. He doesn't have much time left, his health is fading fast.
It's been my experience that MANY members of the religious orders in the present times are people that have ties with or grew up in/around the eastern bloc. The church wasn't so castrated back then, they actively fought against the oppression of the communist regimes. A lot of these people, then, can see what is on it's way if we continue down this path, and they do not like it.
That and the current mass infanticide (abortion) is possibly one of the greatest crimes against humanity in human history. They know this.
I think it was just more buried in the search indexes before the drop pushed it to a bunch of people looking for the source which pushed it further up the search results.
Q posting the Vigano letters was enough to get me to contact a Traditional Latin Mass parish Priest and ask questions.
I had been looking at the Catholic/Freemasonic battle for a few years previously but fell for the "Catholic church is the anti-Christ" lies that Freemasonic "truther" sites push.
I will be baptized soon now that I've had all of my questions and concerns addressed.
Most of what I've read online about the Catholic faith and dogma and tradition has been total lies or misdirection.
Mary will crush the head of the Freemasonic snake.
If there is anyone out there that is in the least bit interested in saving America, all you have to do is read, support, and publicize the hell out of the Reclamation of Proper Governance. It is your ONLY hope.
I was on board with the reclamation of proper governance until the author declared themselves the “supervisor general” ultimate authority of the United States.
Vatican became evil with the beginning of Vatican II in the early 70’s I believe 1972? Yes some wicked corruption and control of the ‘masses’ earlier, totally for ‘the peasants own good’ = taxes/tithing = riches and control
There is no white hats in the mother whore Catholic church. They are leading every single person straight to hell through their perverted Gospel of works salvation. May they all burn in hell for their wickedness. Pedophiles, greedy devils, and wicked men run the Catholic church, and anyone who was actually a saved Christian would leave that horrible institution immediately.
More pedophiles in public schools, by about 10 times as much.
Remember, the Catholic Church was THE FIRST Christian church, and in fact was the only one until Protestants decided they knew better than God. Catholic Church's first Pope was St. Peter, Jesus' disciple. Can your non-denominational sect claim to have such a close connection to Jesus?
Yes, not to mention Catholic means universal. Not to say that that the Catholic church hasn't had its issues or been perfect or looked inward and been able to reform itself.
Exactly. It's the Universal Church, meant for everyone, but then the Prots (Luther especially, who was a fallen away priest, ran off with a nun and married her) thought they knew more than the All-knowing Almighty God. The hubris of humanity will never end.
There are still many based White Hats in the Church, they are not all corrupt. Vigano is a great example. Also, Father Altman, Father Calloway, Cardinal Burke, (all of which I have personally met and can attest to their holiness), and Father Mark Goring are amazing as well! There are many waking up and fighting back. We will win!
I think the deep church/anti deep church struggles have been going on since Gerbert of Aurillac
The world has always been filled with evil. Every denomination has had evil people. There are good and bad people everywhere.
Freemasonic anti-Catholic propaganda.
Gerbert was the magic pope. He was the first French pope, and the pope roughly halfway between Jesus of Nazerath and us. But really, he reintroduced Europe to a lot of lost knowledge.
https://whytodayisbrilliant.wordpress.com/2016/05/12/magic-pope/ https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Gerbert/
Sadly, he was not Italian, and the Romans considered '0' the work of the devil.
Do you have the link for that thread?
i gotchu
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i4I1ebnr/pope-benedict-xvi-may-actually-b/c/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHMJsns2MeqLv6m7S30AgVw/videos
The pope (literally all of them) are the definition of an anti christ. They claim to be the voice of Jesus Christ on Earth, while disregarding every single thing he taught and commanded. Like to call no man your father upon this earth, and to beware of the pharisees who went around in long flowing robes. To not make images and bow down to idols, like their blasphemous pictures of some long haired, faggoty looking effeminate pictures that they call Jesus, and their Mary statues. Read Isiah, where he talks about the children of Israel baking cakes to their false God they called the queen of heaven. Which is what they call Mary. The catholic church is wicked to the core, since the day it was founded.
John Paul 2nd brought more people to Christ than all of America's evangelicals combined. Read into his works with Latin America. John Paul 2nd actively fought liberalism, socialism, and identity politics. When he died , several liberal rags wrote hit pieces against him.
Words are one thing, actions are another. Like Vigano does as a cardinal, Paul was a pope who fought to preserve the freedoms given to us by an era of true divinity.
Even oir forim name the great awakening, reflects that
I know which pagan god you are referring too.
That is Inanna with Babylonian origins that dates back to the 17th century BC while Mary did not give birth to Jesus till around 4 BC. They are not the same my man, google this yourself to see.
The first pope, Peter, was appointed by Jesus. Somehow, I don't think Jesus would have appointed an antichrist.
Exactly. Thank you for that!
"The Church"... as in, the body of Christians, has been in trouble since he handed the keys to a human being. The Old and New testament is full of stories that showcase true human nature: we reject God. From that point.... absolute sh*tshow follows.
As Christians, we have clear instructions from Jesus:
[44] But I say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you: [45] That you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust.
Matthew 5:44-45
This means we pray for the bad popes, the pedophiles, etc. SO hard to do, and I struggle with it every day...
There will always be bad people everywhere, even in the most sacred and holy of places, because sin never takes a rest and every human on earth is vulnerable. The only exceptions were Jesus, his mother Mary, and even his adoptive father Joseph who was given special blessings to resist temptation and sin.
Other than those 3 everyone else is going to commit sin, no matter how small, and that includes popes and bishops and cardinals and priests. Not saying it's okay, it's not, but Jesus died for our sins, past and present and future, so that we might confess those sins and follow Him once again and have eternal life. So, as my own mother says, until death, nothing is settled, and even the worst villains still have a shot at righting themselves, and we must pray for them the most.
You're welcome!
That's your interpretation of the Bible. Whether it is a misinterpretation or not is between you and God.
Keep in mind that the the Codex Vaticanus (the best copy of the Latin Vulgate Bible, which is in practice what the Catholic church has used) and Textus Receptus (the oldest copy of the Protestant Bible but derived from the greek) can be quite different and were based on the judgement of different people (Jerome and Erasmus in this case).
Why? The Receptus was derived from the Greek, and the Vaticanus was derived from the Vulgate (which was derived from Hebrew sources). Now if you consider the Coptic and things like the Syriac church there is even more variation. I would say newer versions of the Bible tend to actually be more 'correct' because there is simply more versions of older scripts to compare against, and people have better command of ancient Hebrew and Greek.
Some of the nuance is lost in translation (for example, "our father" and "our Father in Heaven"). Sometimes in for example, in Hebrew they might have been the same word. In Greek they may have been different. Latin changed a lot from what the Romans spoke from Jesus' time to the Vulgate because of the introduction of barbarian words. Note that translation to other languages (for example English) will come with even more caveats - some of the earlier ones, for example, the King James Version, had a lot of defects. I would study the The New Oxford Annotated Bible, it's great.
Personally I would not read things so literally without studying with a Rosetta Stone. You gotta see the full picture if you are so critical of other people under Jesus' flock. I think modern versions are interesting because over time people have been able to digitize more versions of the Bible, even ancient versions, and compare them against each other. These days people do it with computers since more and more of the manuscripts are online.
And this is just the New Testament, the Old Testament has even more variation (and similarities) especially if you trace back to the Cuneiform/Aramaic and the starts of Semitic language. I think the biggest part of the modern age (last 20 years) has been the explosion of papyrus and the ability to process and translate between languages using computers, maybe the tower of babel in reverse.
I would have faith in Isaiah 55:11
Dude, actually read up and understand the Catholic faith before you start blasting lies which you know are false. We DON'T worship statues, we DON'T worship Mary, we are NOT pagans. This is the easiest stuff to research if you put 2 minutes into it.
https://www.catholic.com/tract/saint-worship https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/collyridianism https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/devotion-to-the-blessed-virgin https://www.catholic.com/tract/do-catholics-worship-statues https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/statues-arent-necessarily-idols https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/idolatry
And as for the "effeminate pictures that they call Jesus" I have no idea what you're talking about. We as the Church didn't make those images, independent artists did. And whether people choose to have them in their houses is up to them, but we don't have pictures of Jesus like that in churches, they are far more intricate than that.
Just a shill probably.
Yeah, those are among the Chief Church officials I trust as a catholic.
"There are still many based White Hats in the Church, they are not all corrupt."
Find me examples of existing based FBI members. We can find based people all throughout the Catholic Church speaking out (which is a very different kind of organization anyways) which is enough to differentiate the two.
It's posts like this that serve as reassurance that Trump does know more than he lets on.
Isn't Melania Catholic?
I mean come on!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFEBQIRwLm0&list=PLOtKxMklQeXYZcYBSoijV7F1ygprAIp6j
Thank you for reposting Absp Vigano's letter to the President. He is a holy man who is fighting a great battle. His words are a powerful reminder of the evil we are up against. They have planned it down to the smallest detail with sustainable communities, road diets, and the passports. I will not cave in to them. In my selfishness, I think of my family but berate myself for not praying hard for the welfare of all families in the world.
You are welcome. Thank you for not giving in to the evil and hatefulness that seems to rule this world. God bless!
That letter is one of the first things that really got my attention. Senior clergy in the catholic faith tend to be stubbornly apolitical. Senior clergy openly calling out the Pope in Catholicism is a big deal. Throughout history, people have died for less.
Then I noticed religious groups showing up at Trump rallies and parades like the Amish and Habited Nuns. Never seen that before. Again, religious groups that historically don't get political.
Personally, I developed a strong sense that something different, something consequential, something beyond politics was going on. Nothing that has happened since that day, has me wavering from that belief.
This is a really good analysis. Catholic clergy are historically anti political, only speaking out if the left forces their hand (cough James Martin cough) or if there is an existential threat against the church. The Nuns, Vigineo, now even the Bishops Conference is speaking out. It’s bigger than politics.
TY Fren. Non-practicing but 10 years Catholic School, for which I am ultimately thankful.
So many strange things lining up, too many. Even the Pope's conduct. Public endorsement of Globo-Homo agenda, the Great Reset and the CCP. WTF is that?
Saw video of Pope physically attack (grab and repeatedly slap hand) Chinese woman in St. Peter's Square when she reached out to him. Saw real anger in his eyes. Not the Holy Father I would expect.
Something is up with the Pope. I don't know what and none of us probably will until the storm.
This "Pope" is definitely not the real Pope, or not a legitimate one anyway. When Benedict XVI "resigned" I knew something was up, because a pope hadn't done that in CENTURIES. This was a big deal. And then when Bergoglio (Francis) was chosen, and all the atheist and anti-Christian and anti-Catholic people I knew were praising him immediately for being more "worldly" and more "with the times" I knew something was VERY wrong. If the world was beginning to approve of the Church it wasn't because the world was getting more Christian, it was because the Church was getting more worldly.
Benedict XVI was not a perfect man or pope either, and he has many secrets he's still holding, but in comparison to the depravity of pachamama-idol-worshiping-Bergoglio, Benedict was extremely conservative.
I recommend reading "Infiltration" by Dr. Taylor Marshall a devout Traditional Catholic. It highlights all the internal corruption of the Church, where it started, who's behind it, who's doing what right now. It's fantastic. Highly recommend.
Do you happen to subscribe to Taylor Marshall's YT? On Holy Saturday I got a notification he was live with the title 'Pope Francis has died'. I was 20 min late seeing it and by that time the video was removed. The video would have been posted around 2pm EST, during the Easter Vigil mass at the Vatican. I took a screenshot of the notification. Very odd.
I do watch it, love it, love his sassyness and saltiness towards the Vatican. But I was busy all day Holy Saturday so I never checked my notifications. I never knew about that video, I have no idea what that's about.
I'll try to find more info.
Is it possible that PBXVI is playing a Trump Card and pretending to resign until he dies and they can get a real pope?
Of course, this is hypothetical speculation.
Not really sure what Benedict's real plan is. I think he was forced to resign, by the black hats (freemasons) in the Church, and there were so many he was powerless to stop it. I don't blame him for this situation, all this mess was thrown into his lap the moment he became pope. This has been going on for centuries, but only in the past 80-100 years has it been really bad and getting worse.
I can only hope that Benedict does the right thing and reveals the truth before he goes. He doesn't have much time left, his health is fading fast.
It's been my experience that MANY members of the religious orders in the present times are people that have ties with or grew up in/around the eastern bloc. The church wasn't so castrated back then, they actively fought against the oppression of the communist regimes. A lot of these people, then, can see what is on it's way if we continue down this path, and they do not like it.
That and the current mass infanticide (abortion) is possibly one of the greatest crimes against humanity in human history. They know this.
I don’t know if Q posted it first but I remember reading it through Q.
I think it was just more buried in the search indexes before the drop pushed it to a bunch of people looking for the source which pushed it further up the search results.
Amazing. I sent to our pastor and no response. That’s okay we are the church, every where we go! Thanks for posting
Shared
Thanks so much. Trump and Vigano both asked it to be shared as much as possible
Anyone knows where I can find his interview with BardsFM?
https://dryburgh.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Archbishop-Vigano_BardsFM-Interview-October-2020_English.pdf
https://old.reddit.com/r/TraditionalCatholics/comments/lq2ve9/vigano_interview_with_bardsfm_from_102020_the/
Thank you for the reminder of that powerful letter. I will send it to my congressman, county supervisor and sheriff.
Thank you so much.
#POPEVIGANO Make it so.
I mean that could happen in a post storm world.
Q posting the Vigano letters was enough to get me to contact a Traditional Latin Mass parish Priest and ask questions.
I had been looking at the Catholic/Freemasonic battle for a few years previously but fell for the "Catholic church is the anti-Christ" lies that Freemasonic "truther" sites push.
I will be baptized soon now that I've had all of my questions and concerns addressed.
Most of what I've read online about the Catholic faith and dogma and tradition has been total lies or misdirection.
Mary will crush the head of the Freemasonic snake.
I am so glad to here you have turned to the Catholic Faith! Viva Christo Rey!
Thank you! And thank you for posting about Vigano's letters.
You are welcome, patriot!
If there is anyone out there that is in the least bit interested in saving America, all you have to do is read, support, and publicize the hell out of the Reclamation of Proper Governance. It is your ONLY hope.
I was on board with the reclamation of proper governance until the author declared themselves the “supervisor general” ultimate authority of the United States.
Do you want your country back?
Vatican became evil with the beginning of Vatican II in the early 70’s I believe 1972? Yes some wicked corruption and control of the ‘masses’ earlier, totally for ‘the peasants own good’ = taxes/tithing = riches and control
There is no white hats in the mother whore Catholic church. They are leading every single person straight to hell through their perverted Gospel of works salvation. May they all burn in hell for their wickedness. Pedophiles, greedy devils, and wicked men run the Catholic church, and anyone who was actually a saved Christian would leave that horrible institution immediately.
Q and Trump disagree, but besides, doesn’t this forum have rules against sectarianism?
More pedophiles in public schools, by about 10 times as much.
Remember, the Catholic Church was THE FIRST Christian church, and in fact was the only one until Protestants decided they knew better than God. Catholic Church's first Pope was St. Peter, Jesus' disciple. Can your non-denominational sect claim to have such a close connection to Jesus?
Yes, not to mention Catholic means universal. Not to say that that the Catholic church hasn't had its issues or been perfect or looked inward and been able to reform itself.
Exactly. It's the Universal Church, meant for everyone, but then the Prots (Luther especially, who was a fallen away priest, ran off with a nun and married her) thought they knew more than the All-knowing Almighty God. The hubris of humanity will never end.
Someone lied to you.