Nancy isn't supporting it...
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
The goal is to introduce this idea into the public opinion in order to normalize it. The media outlets can brain wash listeners into accepting it. Of course they will support it in the end if it means getting more power. After awhile they will say public support for it is growing and they will heed those calls.
I completely agree! Nancy is only saying “no” temporarily; she still supports the commission to “study” the issue. A delay also gives her time to see if the Democrats can control their political downward spiral before 2022. She would gladly pack the court… probably with 10 additional justices for future insurance.
Nancy has not morphed into a new Nancy; she is and will always be 100% political and 100% evil. A scorpion is and will always be a scorpion…
??
Well that sure is a twist!
Plot twist, it's actually an actor in a Pelosi mask!
White Hats In Control
I believe she's controlled. She hasn't been acting Speaker of the House since January 8. Check for yourself daily on live.house.gov Remember last month the Democrats were trying to kick out MTG, and then Pelosi put a stop to it.
Good morning!!
Good morning!
(I get it now.)
Good morning Sunday morning!
Hahahahaha!
right now...
In the END Supreme Court will not exist anyways.
I dont know why they think they need more justices, because SCOTUS already showed their allegiance to Dems by allowing a stolen presidential election..I term SCOTUS as the "blue klux klan"..all they did was change robe colors. I the end, same party same lies.
What if there is a commission to look into packing the court that either finds against it or alternatively the court ends up being packed by conservatives
Definitely caught me off guard
Bet they do.
add the word "yet".
no she is just playing neutral.
For now.
This is a classic tactic - The absurd thing is passed off as a normal thing while they “debate” over an outrageously absurd thing.
She supports the commission that will eventually pack the court, not the bill to pack the court immediately.
So when we go to argue with leftists about it they’re going to repeat lines and articles “proving” that Dems don’t intend to pack the court while simultaneously supporting the actual effort to pack the court because “it’s not court packing it’s just a commission to improve the court.”
And if you want to get this through to a leftist you’ll have to convince them that the commission is actually a cover for court packing - Which they’ll never believe because Dems “rejected” court packing. So as far as they’re concerned there’s never going to be “court packing” even if there is court packing because by the time the courts are packed Dems will refer to it as “justice.”
It’s all misdirection and word games. The fucked up part is that it’s impossible to point this out to a leftist because to them the misdirection and word games are reality itself. You could get them to agree that “court packing = bad” but you’ll never get them to call court packing “court packing.”
yeah in the end it will be "biden only followed the advise of a bi partisan commission that packing the supreme court will save our democracy"
I think she believes the term "unpacking" literally. Further attacking the Trump term and removing all his appointees, creating 3 vacancies to be filled by Xiden/Heels.
Good morning Beijing. You're strings are cut.