This is a forensic audit. I don't think they saw this coming.
They are checking for physical signs of a real ballot. Is it folded in the right way. Is it folded TOO perfect. Has it been handled by human hands. Was it marked in by human hands. Is there a water mark that no one knew existed. Other things I am sure haven't been advertised.
I do not think they had to time to fix half a million or more ballots that didn't fit into one or more of these categories, especially if they didn't know exactly what tests they would do.
A "Hey trump said that there are watermarks on the ballots. W-we should reprint all the ballots with watermarks so as to not to get caught with fraud."
B "Awww yeah, good catch lets do that right now. Like... but, what do they, you know the water ballots, sorry watermarks look like?"
I feel that’s a good point but part of this watermark narrative—this came out back in November—was that outsiders were brought in to assist with this measure. If you search for Steve Piecenzik (he discussed this with someone on Alex Jones show) Trump brought him and a few others into the fold to set up a sting operation.
Intelligence. There's a good chance that the conceited Dems didn't think the watermarks were real. To my knowledge the watermark thing came from the Q community. As a result the DS and MSM probably didn't take it seriously.
Data is raw information, intelligence is organized information and knowledgeable is information acted upon. They had the data. They poorly lumped the data together into the conspiracy pile and moved on. To be fair to them it's wise to look at other, more likely scenarios and go based off of that. You should never discount periphery analysis and come up with contingencies.
Lets look at what had to happen for them to fabricate ballots. They would have needed to give China information about the ballots. It's possible that they gave China and nations that printed the ballots samples of older ballots because they didn't think the watermarks were real they probably didn't look for watermarked ballots to send to China.
I think these people operate in corporate board room situations. If they higher ups say it's a dumb idea then they don't go through with it. If the data says it's statistically impossible then it's not looked at. It's very simple and liner thinking. You can't always think simply when running a nation or conducting a military. You can for a business but even then the more creative you are the more it pays off. Some of the greatest battles in history were won because someone decided to exploit an opportunity no one else would. The Siege of Tyre by Alexander the Great is a good example of this. They didn't think he was crazy enough to stick with building a land bridge. When he did they had no contingencies. The Hessians didn't expect the Patriots to cross the Delaware but through faith and skill they did. To quote Sun Tzu;
"To perceive victory when it is known to all is not really skilful... It does not take much strength to lift a hair, it does not take sharp eyes to see the sun and moon, it does not take sharp ears to hear the thunderclap."
I think that nobody (either side) saw this Jovan Pulitzer guy coming. If you had a blank paper and could write down any skill set that you would want in a person coming to help you in an election fraud situation, you couldn't ask for much more than what's in this Jovan package. Brilliant, independently wealthy, passionate for his side and having tons of previous experience in ballot investigations. What kind of luck has fallen upon us? Unbelievable. Feeling good about this state, so far.
The watermark story has been around a long time, it's not a new thing.
HOWEVER, there is also a much less circulated story that involves the paper itself which the ballots were printed on, and was allegedly supplied by the feds, and it is supposed to have a unique and distinct forensic makeup that can't be duplicated, and that is how they are going to spot the actual fake ballots.
Whether either story is actually true remains to be seen.
Part of the audit is knocking on doors to confirm that people that voted actually did. Dr. Frank's team knocked on a lot of doors and found a significant percentage that the system says voted but said they did not.
That is one of the ways they cheated - they know who hadn't voted yet and unlikely to vote and created votes for them.
Here is the reality. The answers have been known since the election. Remember white hats were monitoring the election. Retired Col. Waldron said his team captured the data and packets from Maricopa County. If they did it you can bet MI or someone loyal to President Trump did and has already analyzed the scanned ballot images.
It does appear the DS tried to destroy some evidence. Remember the fire at one of The Maricopa County Election official’s barn? Georgia shredded. Now with the audit going forward it will be pretty obvious if ballots are missing. As for watermarks, they are part of the paper making process, not the printing process. The UV light helps detect when a watermark is faked through printing.
I remember getting all excited about the watermarks back in November/Dec and then the whole issue just disappeared. I asked repeatedly if anyone had any new info and it was just dropped. Wonder if there were some operatives on here giving disinfo about 'some other factor' to distract from the watermark issue. Wasn't that about the time of the trucker in Pa trucking pre-marked ballots from NY to Philly? That sucked up some good airtime.
So, just to ask the scary question... What happens if the fraud they "uncover" is fraud made to look like Trump cheated... Or tried to cheat. ** It wont**
I'm not just dooming, seriously what the fuck happens then? Why is this the first time we're hearing about the ballots having watermarks? Shouldn't that be common knowledge? And if it was secret, do you REALLY think the deep state didn't know US Election Ballots had watermarks? Give me a break... I dont think it is confirmed about these watermarks and even if the DS knew about it they figured it wouldnt matter.
What if they exclusively printed fraudulent ballots with watermarks to make the real ballots look fake? NAH
My thoughts on this is Trumps team is working on the inside to push the audit when it is most opportune. He has plenty of states to choose from so why is AZ first. He has been saying there is going to be fraud uncovered not that the fraud has been covered up. That would mean he knows the outcome already and it will be Bigly.
Its been stated many times Trump gave them enough rope to hang themselves. Even if we somehow got an immediate forensic audit it wouldn't have been enough time to figure out all the traitors or have the substantial amount of evidence to support the steal we do now. He couldn't act like a dictator or blm and antifa would have burned down everything or worse. The way trump has done this seems like the only peacefull way. Also bidens terrible polices are out there for everyone to see and some people have major regrets voting for bidet. Its not looking like his approval rating is going up anytime soon. What else would you suggest he should have done to your liking?
They sent 79 attorneys to Arizona; then, hired a new attorney with connections to the judge so they could force his recusal. Their attorneys have been aggressively involved all along in the states where lawsuits were filed, and were likely responsible for judges refusing to hear those cases. Hissy fits about this audit are erupting throughout--among Liberals, the media, social media, etc. These are not the actions of people who are confident and in control.
The cheating was well organized; likewise, the planned responses and actions, whenever the election was questioned, were also well organized. However, they made a fatal mistake: Friends and enemies alike are consistent in one opinion, “Never underestimate Trump”. NCSWIC
Too many people on the Left are panicking. Look at Rachel Maddow. Take a minute and watch the "crazies" news channels just to hear their ranting about the audit. They're going crazy. I don't think they knew there was a watermark. Too many Lefties and Lawyers were/are trying to STOP the audit. That says a lot to me. NCSWIC.
The left has been saying all along that voter fraud is a myth. That if it does happen, it’s statistically insignificant. And if there are any irregularities at the polls, it’s always an attempt to disenfranchise minority voters.
If they were using this audit to manufacture a case for republican cheating, I think it would contradict the narrative they’ve spent 20 years creating. It would do them more harm than good since (fingers crossed) it looks like they will show factual examples of fraud, in huge numbers, in a predominantly white county. That busts their narrative.
This is a forensic audit. I don't think they saw this coming.
They are checking for physical signs of a real ballot. Is it folded in the right way. Is it folded TOO perfect. Has it been handled by human hands. Was it marked in by human hands. Is there a water mark that no one knew existed. Other things I am sure haven't been advertised.
I do not think they had to time to fix half a million or more ballots that didn't fit into one or more of these categories, especially if they didn't know exactly what tests they would do.
A "Hey trump said that there are watermarks on the ballots. W-we should reprint all the ballots with watermarks so as to not to get caught with fraud."
B "Awww yeah, good catch lets do that right now. Like... but, what do they, you know the water ballots, sorry watermarks look like?"
A "Ummmmmmmmm"
I feel that’s a good point but part of this watermark narrative—this came out back in November—was that outsiders were brought in to assist with this measure. If you search for Steve Piecenzik (he discussed this with someone on Alex Jones show) Trump brought him and a few others into the fold to set up a sting operation.
Here’s an article link, but there’s a video too on banned.video: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/290758
Intelligence. There's a good chance that the conceited Dems didn't think the watermarks were real. To my knowledge the watermark thing came from the Q community. As a result the DS and MSM probably didn't take it seriously.
Data is raw information, intelligence is organized information and knowledgeable is information acted upon. They had the data. They poorly lumped the data together into the conspiracy pile and moved on. To be fair to them it's wise to look at other, more likely scenarios and go based off of that. You should never discount periphery analysis and come up with contingencies.
Lets look at what had to happen for them to fabricate ballots. They would have needed to give China information about the ballots. It's possible that they gave China and nations that printed the ballots samples of older ballots because they didn't think the watermarks were real they probably didn't look for watermarked ballots to send to China.
I think these people operate in corporate board room situations. If they higher ups say it's a dumb idea then they don't go through with it. If the data says it's statistically impossible then it's not looked at. It's very simple and liner thinking. You can't always think simply when running a nation or conducting a military. You can for a business but even then the more creative you are the more it pays off. Some of the greatest battles in history were won because someone decided to exploit an opportunity no one else would. The Siege of Tyre by Alexander the Great is a good example of this. They didn't think he was crazy enough to stick with building a land bridge. When he did they had no contingencies. The Hessians didn't expect the Patriots to cross the Delaware but through faith and skill they did. To quote Sun Tzu;
"To perceive victory when it is known to all is not really skilful... It does not take much strength to lift a hair, it does not take sharp eyes to see the sun and moon, it does not take sharp ears to hear the thunderclap."
Or to put it simply and quote Pantera
"To be, to see cannot be taught."
yeah, and what happened to the fake ballots the chinese were supposedly burning at their closed embassy in texas
I think that nobody (either side) saw this Jovan Pulitzer guy coming. If you had a blank paper and could write down any skill set that you would want in a person coming to help you in an election fraud situation, you couldn't ask for much more than what's in this Jovan package. Brilliant, independently wealthy, passionate for his side and having tons of previous experience in ballot investigations. What kind of luck has fallen upon us? Unbelievable. Feeling good about this state, so far.
The watermark story has been around a long time, it's not a new thing. HOWEVER, there is also a much less circulated story that involves the paper itself which the ballots were printed on, and was allegedly supplied by the feds, and it is supposed to have a unique and distinct forensic makeup that can't be duplicated, and that is how they are going to spot the actual fake ballots. Whether either story is actually true remains to be seen.
Part of the audit is knocking on doors to confirm that people that voted actually did. Dr. Frank's team knocked on a lot of doors and found a significant percentage that the system says voted but said they did not.
That is one of the ways they cheated - they know who hadn't voted yet and unlikely to vote and created votes for them.
Here is the reality. The answers have been known since the election. Remember white hats were monitoring the election. Retired Col. Waldron said his team captured the data and packets from Maricopa County. If they did it you can bet MI or someone loyal to President Trump did and has already analyzed the scanned ballot images.
It does appear the DS tried to destroy some evidence. Remember the fire at one of The Maricopa County Election official’s barn? Georgia shredded. Now with the audit going forward it will be pretty obvious if ballots are missing. As for watermarks, they are part of the paper making process, not the printing process. The UV light helps detect when a watermark is faked through printing.
This is the 1st time you have heard about the watermarks? Where the hell have you been?
I remember getting all excited about the watermarks back in November/Dec and then the whole issue just disappeared. I asked repeatedly if anyone had any new info and it was just dropped. Wonder if there were some operatives on here giving disinfo about 'some other factor' to distract from the watermark issue. Wasn't that about the time of the trucker in Pa trucking pre-marked ballots from NY to Philly? That sucked up some good airtime.
My answers to your question
So, just to ask the scary question... What happens if the fraud they "uncover" is fraud made to look like Trump cheated... Or tried to cheat. ** It wont**
I'm not just dooming, seriously what the fuck happens then? Why is this the first time we're hearing about the ballots having watermarks? Shouldn't that be common knowledge? And if it was secret, do you REALLY think the deep state didn't know US Election Ballots had watermarks? Give me a break... I dont think it is confirmed about these watermarks and even if the DS knew about it they figured it wouldnt matter.
What if they exclusively printed fraudulent ballots with watermarks to make the real ballots look fake? NAH
Could u please tell me what ncswic means I see it all the time and don’t know
Nobody Can Stop What Is Coming
Thank you wow .that’s been puzzling me for a long time lol appreciate your time
My thoughts on this is Trumps team is working on the inside to push the audit when it is most opportune. He has plenty of states to choose from so why is AZ first. He has been saying there is going to be fraud uncovered not that the fraud has been covered up. That would mean he knows the outcome already and it will be Bigly.
AThe DRats always stick together,
Its been stated many times Trump gave them enough rope to hang themselves. Even if we somehow got an immediate forensic audit it wouldn't have been enough time to figure out all the traitors or have the substantial amount of evidence to support the steal we do now. He couldn't act like a dictator or blm and antifa would have burned down everything or worse. The way trump has done this seems like the only peacefull way. Also bidens terrible polices are out there for everyone to see and some people have major regrets voting for bidet. Its not looking like his approval rating is going up anytime soon. What else would you suggest he should have done to your liking?
They sent 79 attorneys to Arizona; then, hired a new attorney with connections to the judge so they could force his recusal. Their attorneys have been aggressively involved all along in the states where lawsuits were filed, and were likely responsible for judges refusing to hear those cases. Hissy fits about this audit are erupting throughout--among Liberals, the media, social media, etc. These are not the actions of people who are confident and in control.
The cheating was well organized; likewise, the planned responses and actions, whenever the election was questioned, were also well organized. However, they made a fatal mistake: Friends and enemies alike are consistent in one opinion, “Never underestimate Trump”.
NCSWIC
Too many people on the Left are panicking. Look at Rachel Maddow. Take a minute and watch the "crazies" news channels just to hear their ranting about the audit. They're going crazy. I don't think they knew there was a watermark. Too many Lefties and Lawyers were/are trying to STOP the audit. That says a lot to me. NCSWIC.
The left has been saying all along that voter fraud is a myth. That if it does happen, it’s statistically insignificant. And if there are any irregularities at the polls, it’s always an attempt to disenfranchise minority voters.
If they were using this audit to manufacture a case for republican cheating, I think it would contradict the narrative they’ve spent 20 years creating. It would do them more harm than good since (fingers crossed) it looks like they will show factual examples of fraud, in huge numbers, in a predominantly white county. That busts their narrative.