Scott Adams with the gold!!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Has Scott stopped promoting mask-wearing, or is he still all in on that 'science'? Just wondering if he follows his own advice.
Maybe he doesn't know WHAT to do anymore? Either way, this is a very nice red pill for the brain washed masses.
I see your reasoning, I can see that in theory that masks might reduce the viral load,
but many studies for years have found no benefit.
This. There are literally dozens of studies over the past 10 years that show no statistical difference in wearing or not wearing a mask to prevent passing or getting a virus. All the drops end up in the mask which still go right through the fabric.
And what do the leftists in the Xiden admin what to cut out of our diet? Red meat. Plandemic in action.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article A May 2020 meta-study on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.
https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/ Danish RCT study
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidence-with-politics/ no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth masks against virus infection or transmission.
https://www.uea.ac.uk/about/-/new-study-reveals-blueprint-for-getting-out-of-covid-19-lockdown mask requirement was of no benefit and could even increase the risk of infection.
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data University of Illinois concluded face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372 cloth face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047217v2 An April 2020 Cochrane review (preprint) found that face masks in the general population or health care workers didn’t reduce influenza-like illness (ILI) cases.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528v1 "evidence is not sufficiently strong to support widespread use of facemasks”
http://www.asahi.com/sp/ajw/articles/13523664 Japanese researchers found that cloth masks “offer zero protection against coronavirus”
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577 A 2015 study in the BMJ Open found cloth masks may increase infection risk
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2019/02/01/Millions-in-Japan-affected-as-flu-outbreak-grips-country/9191549043797/ Japan, despite widespread use of masks, had influenza epidemic
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817 The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers.
The risks outweigh the sole benefit. Herd immunity is preferable anyway.
100 million covid particles can fit on the head of a straight pin. Tell me how a mask will prevent those particles, which can only be seen with an electron microscope, from getting through a piece of cloth?
Meanwhile, go through a store and touch items which have already been touched by someone who coughed into their hand before putting on the mask.
Scott Adams has a lot of silly beliefs, but when he's right (like above), he's right.
1 thing I know:
If you say The science, you're a retard
Scientist only as good as a computer. Bullshit in, bullshit out. Most of what goes into these guys is bullshit.
I went into "science" over 40 years ago because I thought it was a noble career path. The "man-made global warming" theory was the start of the end of science as a noble profession. Although even I thought that theory was good at the time, data collected during the past 40 years has shown that the theory was not valid (and the reason for resorting to "climate change" as the mantra, because they couldn't even use "man-made" as part of it, since it was so blatantly un-supported by the data). I'm not sure which was corrupted first, science, or medicine; that would be an interesting PhD topic for some sociologist (but of course, what university would allow that for a PhD topic? :) ).
The claim is that the mask is good for the seasonal flu, they have the numbers to back it up. No seasonal flu.
Wuhan Flu (i.e. Covid 19) = seasonal flu + propaganda
'Masks' have also reduced heart related deaths in the UK by 60%!
Of course the reality is that heart related deaths were being classified as WuFlu deaths to pump up the figures and scared the brainwashed sheep.
Yea, but no Heart Attacks.
Every flu death has been classified as a WuFlu death. Based scientists have examined alleged WuFlu positive tests and in many cases they were indeed the regular flu.
Yea, but no flu.
Most people today don't seem to even understand what science is. That includes so-called "scientists" who have that as a profession.
Science is following the Scientific Method. Period.
Come up with an hypothesis. Test it. Observe. Conclude. Repeat.
Be open to considering new evidence that contradicts current understandings, but put that new evidence to the test to see if it holds up.
Today's "science" does none of that in most cases.
Wuhan Flu = no science has been performed to isolate and purify, and then determine if it causes illness.
Vaccines/Experimental Drugs = no science has been performed to identify subjects with Wuhan Flu and then do a double blind study with drug vs. placebo.
PCR test = although the procedure is scientific, the claim that a specific result after an arbitrary number of cycles means someone is sick or not is complete guessworkd and made-up fantasy. It has nothing at all to do with science.
Face masks to stop the spread of virus = no science at all. Just claims having no testing done (other than spraying water on mannequins, which proves nothing).
He's spent a lot of effort discrediting Q, but he's also mentioned how great it would be to have a massive military counter-brainwashing program. We know he's had personal interactions with Trump. Has there ever been a Q drop posted at the same time as Coffee With Scott Adams was live? Food for thought... XP
I think you misread my comment, I didn't say anything about bad interactions. Scott has been in the white house and had personal (the word I used) conversations with Trump. There was one particular visit in 2018 where Trump asked Scott who he thought the democrat vice president nominee would be, and Scott told him Kamala Harris.