Covid Skeptics are at the far end of the spectrum as the least likely to get vaccinated. The primary barrier for people in this group are their specific, deeply held beliefs about Covid-19. Everyone in this group believes at least one conspiracy theory related to the pandemic, whether it’s that microchips are implanted with the Covid vaccine; Covid-19 has been exploited by the government to control people; or that the pandemic was caused by a ring of people who secretly manipulate world events.
Add
"Evidence suggests the vaccines are killing more people than Covid-19, especially for younger age groups"
"This is an experiment and we don't know the long term effects"*
and you get me.
I'll take the "Covid Skeptic" moniker for the purposes of their argument.
Only 14% of us don't actually research and see the death rates from covid aren't high and the long term effects of a vax could lead to a much deadlier event?
Really? Only 14% of us are sane humans today?
Sad and scary.
I don't trust their numbers anymore than I trust "Biden won" numbers.
How odd this article doesn't mention those of us who don't want to become New World Order GMOs and who don't want vaccine injuries and blood clots in our brains and lungs over a poison that does nothing to vaccinate against the COVID sniffles.
Where’s the option on the survey that says “ya’ll can suck my dick” - it’s gotta be 20+% easily. I take these surveys super duper seriously. And ever since I was ambushed by that CVS employee last week, I’m ready and waiting for the next person to ask if I’ve gotten the jab yet.
I’m serious too, I’ll respond by saying “are you going to suck my dick? There’s your answer.” Now, I bet 99% will say “no” but what happens if the 1% say “yes” then I’ve gotten myself into a predicament.
Yesterday I had a friend (?) who is a known über liberal say, “you know WE need you to get the shot”. So now there’s a WE. I took the WE to be those who feel superior to others as shown by their virtuous taking of the jab.
Crap article by a crap organization. The damn thing is given at no cost, in many cases these days it even comes with free gifts and GIBs if you'll just take the damn thing, yet the Times claims the cost as a reason why.
DAMN wot losers they bees!
Never occurred to the media twits that Religious objections or philosophical objections or medical objections are the Prime Movers here, or the fact the lying government and media falsely label these things 'vaccines' when they are not any such things.
They don't mention the fact the adverse effects from the gene therapy drugs are worse than from the chinese flu either, why would any sane person take poison to 'cure' a thing which is not a threat...?
Go look at the VAERS data, NYT, and try again maybe.
But no sell, you have poisoned about all the idiots who want to be poisoned and no matter how many incentives you offer we ain't bending the knee.
Add
and you get me.
I'll take the "Covid Skeptic" moniker for the purposes of their argument.
My group isn't mentioned either....the intelligent
Only 14% of us don't actually research and see the death rates from covid aren't high and the long term effects of a vax could lead to a much deadlier event?
Really? Only 14% of us are sane humans today?
Sad and scary.
I don't trust their numbers anymore than I trust "Biden won" numbers.
18% if you count system distrusters, assuming they would probably also fall under the last category.
I'm not skeptical at all. I know it's bad poison.
Proud to say...I'm one of those Arkansas skeptics!
How odd this article doesn't mention those of us who don't want to become New World Order GMOs and who don't want vaccine injuries and blood clots in our brains and lungs over a poison that does nothing to vaccinate against the COVID sniffles.
That should include the 40,000 people a month who are suffering COVID vaccination injuries and deaths in that group then too... and also take into account that most of the COVID injuries and deaths are either not being reported or being recorded incorrectly as deaths because of the flu rather than the vaccine.
Where's the Chad Anon group?
Where’s the option on the survey that says “ya’ll can suck my dick” - it’s gotta be 20+% easily. I take these surveys super duper seriously. And ever since I was ambushed by that CVS employee last week, I’m ready and waiting for the next person to ask if I’ve gotten the jab yet.
I’m serious too, I’ll respond by saying “are you going to suck my dick? There’s your answer.” Now, I bet 99% will say “no” but what happens if the 1% say “yes” then I’ve gotten myself into a predicament.
Go to any libtard city and I bet you'll get more than 1% that say yes
One more category:
I guess some of us fall into all 4 categories lol
The fuck is this lol
Yesterday I had a friend (?) who is a known über liberal say, “you know WE need you to get the shot”. So now there’s a WE. I took the WE to be those who feel superior to others as shown by their virtuous taking of the jab.
Crap article by a crap organization. The damn thing is given at no cost, in many cases these days it even comes with free gifts and GIBs if you'll just take the damn thing, yet the Times claims the cost as a reason why.
DAMN wot losers they bees!
Never occurred to the media twits that Religious objections or philosophical objections or medical objections are the Prime Movers here, or the fact the lying government and media falsely label these things 'vaccines' when they are not any such things.
They don't mention the fact the adverse effects from the gene therapy drugs are worse than from the chinese flu either, why would any sane person take poison to 'cure' a thing which is not a threat...?
Go look at the VAERS data, NYT, and try again maybe.
But no sell, you have poisoned about all the idiots who want to be poisoned and no matter how many incentives you offer we ain't bending the knee.
https://files.catbox.moe/4vq62t.jpeg
Strange colloquial way of writing "it must've taken".