1 x outraged public "screaming something must be done" +
1 x government happily removing guns from all responsible owners because of a nut job running altar programming +
1 x slightly relieved public thanking the government for their individual last line of self-defence
=
1 x cucked country. We've lost most of what once truly made us great: people with spines and the courage of their convictions and the ability to think critically and independently.
Right now in VIC the plebs are lining up in droves to get their shots. Primary Objective achieved. Pressure to be maintained until process complete.
It really is as depressingly simple as that
...IMO anyway.
As you said, we do have a Bill of Rights in America. However, (1) unless our public servants obey their oaths of office and protect our rights, (2) we hold them absolutely and immediately accountable when they do not by recall or indictment, and (3) forcefully but not necessarily violently insist on our rights, we have nothing. In a Constitutional Republic, we, the people, were always meant to be very active and responsible participants in our government at all levels. That most think that their duty is only to vote shows how successful our marxist/communist "education" has been.
Unfortunately we've already been defanged when they took our guns and the rights to bare arms, it is a steep uphill battle to get power back from politicians and we weren't even able to put our 2 cents in because the people its affecting now just weren't born by the time this happened
Have you read Australia's? No we don't actually have freedom of speech the same way you do, its closer to the Canadian or u.k. I have looked and unless you can show the direct applicable parts to my yourself I don't think you're correct
The US Constitution doesn't grant any rights. It presumes the rights are pre-existing and granted by God. All the Constitution does is prohibit the government from infringing on those rights.
In Australia you have the same rights granted by the same God. Your Constitution may not be as explicit in prohibiting government violation of those rights, but that does not mean the rights don't exist.
The first 10 Amendments were second thoughts. They were put in to reinforce the notion that blessings (i.e., rights) bestowed on the people by God are not to be taken away by the government. This is implicit in the articles of the U.S. Constitution, but some founders felt a need to give it explicit expression.
So the Bill of Rights is not technically necessary, since everything flows from the premise of people processing unalienable rights.
No, not all Commonwealth countries have the same constitutions at all. NZ and UK are in sharp contrast to AUS.
Your laws are only as good as those enforcing it. You can have all the Bill of Rights you like. Is it being upheld in the US? No more than anywhere else.
People moan about the gun issue. It's not even remotely the same thing as the US. The countries were form completely differently. Why on earth should every country have the same structure? It's culturally illogical.
You can still own weapons in Australia. Yes, there are licenses, but there's also less in circulation with criminals. If the US authorities wish to take your weapons, guess what? They will. You can "they won't take muh guns" all you like, but they will sneak in like a thief in the night and do it. You're out gunned regardless when it comes to defense against the military. See point 2.
Freedom of speech? Australia has fairly decent implied freedom of speech laws, the UK is not Australia. Where is the US's freedom of speech right now? How is that being upheld? They have ways, very, very viable ways to circumvent 1A. People have just grown to passively accept that "Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences" and ergo, have in turn come to accept that freedom from consequences means if you say shit, you get hit and then your Soros backed DA will make sure you don't get charged for your crime, yet you go and protest an illegal election and you sure as shit DO understand those consequences.
Besides, I didn't say go do your research, I said be informed. There's a leaning I've seen towards victimhood in people here. Like "my state, my country etc isn't as great as ____". Yet if you look at the application unilaterally, how are the laws really being applied? See point 2, again.
Good point. If you consider it though, why become a powerless martyr sitting in a tyrant’s jail. What’s in a name? Carry it like a banner of Anons. Anons means no name known. It’s the words and deeds that give it power. And don’t forget to decree it under God as your UNALIENABLE RIGHTS!!!
Martin Bryant never suicided his in risdon prison serving a life time sentence.
There was no inquest into the matter.
There is a lot of stuff that doesn't add up about the massacre
Always the case with a False Flag event.
Is this the one where police found him and he was telling them they got it wrong, “I’m the hostage!” when they approached?
Let me do the math:
1 x brainwashed zombie +
1 x killing spree +
1 x outraged public "screaming something must be done" +
1 x government happily removing guns from all responsible owners because of a nut job running altar programming +
1 x slightly relieved public thanking the government for their individual last line of self-defence
=
1 x cucked country. We've lost most of what once truly made us great: people with spines and the courage of their convictions and the ability to think critically and independently.
Right now in VIC the plebs are lining up in droves to get their shots. Primary Objective achieved. Pressure to be maintained until process complete.
It really is as depressingly simple as that ...IMO anyway.
Its fucking annoying but we dont have a bill of rights in Australia so we essentially don't have freedoms, atleast not like America.
Would be great to get one though
As you said, we do have a Bill of Rights in America. However, (1) unless our public servants obey their oaths of office and protect our rights, (2) we hold them absolutely and immediately accountable when they do not by recall or indictment, and (3) forcefully but not necessarily violently insist on our rights, we have nothing. In a Constitutional Republic, we, the people, were always meant to be very active and responsible participants in our government at all levels. That most think that their duty is only to vote shows how successful our marxist/communist "education" has been.
Unfortunately we've already been defanged when they took our guns and the rights to bare arms, it is a steep uphill battle to get power back from politicians and we weren't even able to put our 2 cents in because the people its affecting now just weren't born by the time this happened
I would advise you to go and read both Australia's and the US's and see their applications. You have as many rights as Americans do. Be informed.
Have you read Australia's? No we don't actually have freedom of speech the same way you do, its closer to the Canadian or u.k. I have looked and unless you can show the direct applicable parts to my yourself I don't think you're correct
The US Constitution doesn't grant any rights. It presumes the rights are pre-existing and granted by God. All the Constitution does is prohibit the government from infringing on those rights.
In Australia you have the same rights granted by the same God. Your Constitution may not be as explicit in prohibiting government violation of those rights, but that does not mean the rights don't exist.
See my above post. Stop worshipping the US and understand the application of laws are not unilateral.
The first 10 Amendments were second thoughts. They were put in to reinforce the notion that blessings (i.e., rights) bestowed on the people by God are not to be taken away by the government. This is implicit in the articles of the U.S. Constitution, but some founders felt a need to give it explicit expression.
So the Bill of Rights is not technically necessary, since everything flows from the premise of people processing unalienable rights.
Here are the issues :
No, not all Commonwealth countries have the same constitutions at all. NZ and UK are in sharp contrast to AUS.
Your laws are only as good as those enforcing it. You can have all the Bill of Rights you like. Is it being upheld in the US? No more than anywhere else.
People moan about the gun issue. It's not even remotely the same thing as the US. The countries were form completely differently. Why on earth should every country have the same structure? It's culturally illogical.
You can still own weapons in Australia. Yes, there are licenses, but there's also less in circulation with criminals. If the US authorities wish to take your weapons, guess what? They will. You can "they won't take muh guns" all you like, but they will sneak in like a thief in the night and do it. You're out gunned regardless when it comes to defense against the military. See point 2.
Freedom of speech? Australia has fairly decent implied freedom of speech laws, the UK is not Australia. Where is the US's freedom of speech right now? How is that being upheld? They have ways, very, very viable ways to circumvent 1A. People have just grown to passively accept that "Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences" and ergo, have in turn come to accept that freedom from consequences means if you say shit, you get hit and then your Soros backed DA will make sure you don't get charged for your crime, yet you go and protest an illegal election and you sure as shit DO understand those consequences.
Besides, I didn't say go do your research, I said be informed. There's a leaning I've seen towards victimhood in people here. Like "my state, my country etc isn't as great as ____". Yet if you look at the application unilaterally, how are the laws really being applied? See point 2, again.
Start drafting one with your frens? Use ours as an outline. ?. Sign it using pen-names like, “Alexander Hamilton” etc?!!
Would signing it with a pen name not discredit it as viable since technically no one actually signed it?
I wonder if it is so simple as to draft one and sign it and have people make it law
And yes it IS THAT SIMPLE, if it’s an honorable document.
Good point. If you consider it though, why become a powerless martyr sitting in a tyrant’s jail. What’s in a name? Carry it like a banner of Anons. Anons means no name known. It’s the words and deeds that give it power. And don’t forget to decree it under God as your UNALIENABLE RIGHTS!!!
Amend it. Start a movement.