Firstly, why do you now trust the CDC when it confirms your bias?
That makes zero sense.
Secondly, don't you find it odd that the majority of deaths mentioned on VAERS are Pfizer patients or Moderna and not J&J, yet J&J and AZ-O are the ones being targeted as "very bad, not good" by various governments?
Don't you find it odd that those two latter ones are AD26/ChAdOx1 vector-based vaccines and the former are new, untested, unverified mRNA gene therapies?
Don't you find that strange?
It's all good and well to use information for research, but question why, how and the quality of the information that's being put out there and match it up to other known information.
I don't think they are trusting them just making note of the mention, we all know there have been WELL over 5K in deaths from their human experimentation.
the argument is that adverse affects aren't as reported as frequently as death so that the death number is closer to accurate. I.e, a bad cough is easier not to report than someone dying.
Which could be true. But we live in a time of total deceit under an illegal coup supported by a supplicant media. So I would venture ALL injuries, from mild to death, are ALL under-reported.
The only person I know that died from the china virus was shortly after her second jab. No mention of it having any roll in her death. Surely it was just a coincidence, and don't you dare ask any questions that might dissuade anyone else from getting the jab!
This is not about trusting the CDC. This is simply highlighting that the CDC are finally being forced to acknowledge the data.
Of course, the true death totals are significantly higher that what the VAERS reporting system has logged. Look at the sudden unexpected death figures (up from approx 2,000 per month to 5-6,000 per month since the WuFlu vaccine began), so yes, the VAERS system is under-reporting the true death figure from the vaccines.
But again, this isn't about trusting the liars at the CDC. OP's post is simply about highlighting that the CDC are being forced to acknowledge the data.
Firstly, why do you now trust the CDC when it confirms your bias? That makes zero sense.
Secondly, don't you find it odd that the majority of deaths mentioned on VAERS are Pfizer patients or Moderna and not J&J, yet J&J and AZ-O are the ones being targeted as "very bad, not good" by various governments?
Don't you find it odd that those two latter ones are AD26/ChAdOx1 vector-based vaccines and the former are new, untested, unverified mRNA gene therapies?
Don't you find that strange?
It's all good and well to use information for research, but question why, how and the quality of the information that's being put out there and match it up to other known information.
I don't think they are trusting them just making note of the mention, we all know there have been WELL over 5K in deaths from their human experimentation.
To add to this, fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are ever reported. So this number is likely much larger.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rfk-jr-david-kessler-covid-vaccine-vaers/
the argument is that adverse affects aren't as reported as frequently as death so that the death number is closer to accurate. I.e, a bad cough is easier not to report than someone dying.
Which could be true. But we live in a time of total deceit under an illegal coup supported by a supplicant media. So I would venture ALL injuries, from mild to death, are ALL under-reported.
It is said only 1% of vaccine events are reported to VAERS.
So in reality, the real number is 99% times higher.
4,863 reports of death on VAERS (so far) x 99% = About 481,437 Deaths About 1/2 million deaths.
Genuinely curious, what makes you say this?
The only person I know that died from the china virus was shortly after her second jab. No mention of it having any roll in her death. Surely it was just a coincidence, and don't you dare ask any questions that might dissuade anyone else from getting the jab!
Not even remotely close to 5k.
This is not about trusting the CDC. This is simply highlighting that the CDC are finally being forced to acknowledge the data.
Of course, the true death totals are significantly higher that what the VAERS reporting system has logged. Look at the sudden unexpected death figures (up from approx 2,000 per month to 5-6,000 per month since the WuFlu vaccine began), so yes, the VAERS system is under-reporting the true death figure from the vaccines.
But again, this isn't about trusting the liars at the CDC. OP's post is simply about highlighting that the CDC are being forced to acknowledge the data.
Heck YEAH it’s “strange”. More sinistry.