Just saw this on Lynn Wood’s Telegram Channel. General Flynn’s perspective is much appreciated. It’s sad and amazing how many people argue it is unconstitutional to remove someone placed in the Office of the President through massive fraud and likely foreign interference. But consider the flip side of that coin, they are essentially arguing it is constitutional to usurp the will of the people and capture the Presidency through fraud and illegality.
You misunderstand. The problem is there is no constitutional method/path/instruction for how to do it. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be done, only that the constitution doesn't say how. We'll need to forge a new path. True patriots can handle it.
Agreed. But that's why people say a solution is unconstitutional. Aconstitutional or non-constitutionally prescribed are more accurate, but harder to talk about, because we first have to acknowledge that we already failed to perform within the constitution.
You can't even keep a job as a UPS delivery driver if you get caught fraudulently changing your resume yet I am supposed to believe fraudulently stealing an election will award you with the presidency?? GTFOH
Our government today is already unconstitutional: electors were chosen unconstitutionally because states ran their elections unconstitutionally by using methods prohibited by the constitution (electors certified by executive instead of by legislatures). We are already off the path. Nothing the country does today is constitutional. This is why the only way is the military.
Leave it to the DEEPSTATE to say...Just because YOU caught us Cheating...it is against the rules, for you to replace us...
MSLSD - love it!
Just saw this on Lynn Wood’s Telegram Channel. General Flynn’s perspective is much appreciated. It’s sad and amazing how many people argue it is unconstitutional to remove someone placed in the Office of the President through massive fraud and likely foreign interference. But consider the flip side of that coin, they are essentially arguing it is constitutional to usurp the will of the people and capture the Presidency through fraud and illegality.
You misunderstand. The problem is there is no constitutional method/path/instruction for how to do it. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be done, only that the constitution doesn't say how. We'll need to forge a new path. True patriots can handle it.
Total agreement, a path will need to be forged and it can be done.
YES
Just because there is no precedent does not mean one cannot be set.
That is only a perceived problem.
In reality the Constitution is carefully designed to be a document that spells out what gov CAN'T do. It is a RESTRICTIVE document only.
It was never designed to be a complete recipe book and instruction manual for everything that everyone MAY, CAN, SHOULD, or MUST do.
Agreed. But that's why people say a solution is unconstitutional. Aconstitutional or non-constitutionally prescribed are more accurate, but harder to talk about, because we first have to acknowledge that we already failed to perform within the constitution.
Let's fucking GOOOOOOOOOOOO!
You can't even keep a job as a UPS delivery driver if you get caught fraudulently changing your resume yet I am supposed to believe fraudulently stealing an election will award you with the presidency?? GTFOH
Our government today is already unconstitutional: electors were chosen unconstitutionally because states ran their elections unconstitutionally by using methods prohibited by the constitution (electors certified by executive instead of by legislatures). We are already off the path. Nothing the country does today is constitutional. This is why the only way is the military.
What's unconstitutional is to conduct a treasonous coup on live TV and then threaten and intimidate and kill anyone who questions it