I was talking with a coworker today and the "vaccine" topic came up. I've been trying to nudge people around my work into looking at what is really going on with the "vaccines" and explaining they work like allergy shots where they provide short-term relief while ensuring long-term symptoms.
The coworker in question was STAUNCHLY anti-Trump. Not so much pro-Biden, but she drank the CNN cool-aid enough to start "Oh yeah!" busting down brick walls in Biden's name.
Anyway, today in particular I mentioned the problems with the blood clots and how the spike proteins being produced with partial completion and clogging the ACE2 receptors was the likely cause of action for the clotting.
The coworker was responsive to the science, especially since I could back it up with personal experience and explained how I got out of the allergy shot trap, but when I mentioned the following:
And it is isn't even a partisan issue. Trump was the one who pulled all liabilities for manufacturers...
I saw her eyes widen. Like she saw a ghost. Her hate of Trump has faded since the election, but it is still there. I saw the cogs in her head. I imagine she was trying to find ways to blame Trump for the rushed "vaccines" while also trying to reconcile with all the pro-vaccine propaganda she had devoured coming from the Left.
I think I made a genuine impact. I didn't want to scare her and tell her she was gonna die, so I told her the only reason I would ever mention this to someone who is vaccinated was because I thought Ivermectin, HCQ, and Quercetin can help stop any damage from the "vaccines." Quercetin helped me get off allergy shots, so I'm not talking out my ass here.
After that I mentioned that some reports are coming out that some people only got saline shots because the vials of the "vaccine" and the dilution vial of saline are getting mixed up, so she might be one of the lucky ones... She, somewhat proudly, exclaimed she got the Pfizer and I told her it probably didn't matter given the competency of our nurses...
Just thought I'd share. Maybe we can use their own unbridled hatred of Trump as a wake-up call that they can't ignore. Namely, by stating that EVERYONE, whether Trump, RINO, and Democrat, are conspiring to let Big Pharma give Mengele a run for his money on these "vaccines."
I've done something similar. I just say,
"Wait. You WANT to take a vaccine that TRUMP rushed to market, DURING AN ELECTION YEAR, in about 1/5th the normal time, with TOTAL liability protection?"
OMG you can see the cognitive dissonance all over their faces. Some have twitched and had mini seizures. Usually they can't answer - they don't want to argue ORANGE MAN BAD, but they are so brainwashed about the vaccine that they can't argue for it at that point. Hopefully it makes them think. (Alas, I suspect not.)
I've found accusing people of being Trump supporters is extremely effective. Also a good way of identifying based units with plausible deniability.
A black dude showed up to our arcade for the first time after moving to town. He had a red MAGA hat on but the letters spelled out Make Arcades Great Again. My vision is super bad so I didn't mention it since I could only make out the big letters. After the arcade closed we started talking in the parking lot with the new guy and I got a better look at the hat to see it was a meme. I asked him if anybody ever gave him shit for the hat? He said only 2 or 3 times. I told him yeah that's not surprising since the left doesn't know how to read. I could tell he wanted to roll his eyes at the evil trump supporter he just got bodied by all night but couldn't help laughing. His response was "Naw that's not fair" So I told him "Yeah you're right. It's JUST those 2 or 3 that can't read mhmm."
It doesn't take much to open the eyes of people who aren't corrupted yet. I learned this before the election while red pilling all the gamers in my various groups. That's why I believe that 4-6% is accurate. Most people are impartial to things that don't impact their day to day lives. They'll go with the flow in whatever direction pushes them first. Since they're not dug in they're easier to pull out of the muck with verifiable facts. The only time I would link MSM was when they were contradicting themselves otherwise we'd go straight to the source and they would slowly realize these few examples I've shown them is enough to prove the rest of the headlines they see are also lies. It got so easy I was able to redpill people while completely fucking wasted because most don't need that much work before they start thinking for themselves.
Honestly, it's one aspect of all this I cannot get my head around? Trump urged others to vakks after he supposedly came out of hospital, and pushed hard for the vakks makers via Op warp speed.
So it's it harmful, well anecdotally I have more friends with issues after having the needle than I do having had the CV?
If any one has some explanation for me please say so.
https://qalerts.app/?n=4245
HOW DO YOU TRAP [INSTALL MEDICAL ADVISORS_SKY_IS_FALLING] POTUS INTO ENDORSEMENT OR FACE WW MEDICAL-SCIENCE-MEDIA FULL ASSAULT?
IS THIS ABOUT THE ELECTION OR THE VIRUS?
If Trump went against the "vaccines" or even declared Covid-19 a non-emergency, then it wouldn't just be a National issue. The whole WORLD and their corrupt governments/media would have turned on him. He can win a domestic fight, but not a foreign fight where the entirety of the World's news media is calling for his head for "denying science" and try to get him on crimes against humanity charges, citing his exit from the WHO as proof he is negligent in preventing the spread of the virus.
It was a trap he had to fall in to, but he flipped the script on them. He went "Hunt for Red October" on it and ran into the torpedo before it had time to arm itself. That's why he closed travel to China so early and started Operation Warp Speed to rush the "vaccines." They were expecting him to hold out against their NWO poison, and panicked when they realized he wasn't going to play their game.
If he shifts stance now, the same will still occur, but because he is a Private citizen now, and not a dignitary, he has lost his diplomatic immunity in what he says. That's probably why he won't ever get back on Twitter until he is President again, otherwise he can be held liable for what he says in other countries. If he stays on his own platform/website, they can't claim he is spreading dangerous and inflammatory rhetoric on a public platform in order to incite panic.
Finally, if he did go against the "vaccines" they would only be able to push it harder, using TDS as fuel and the fact he removed liabilities as the fire. He can't go back now, and he made the best of a really, really bad hand.
I don't think there's a satisfactory answer to this and I have the same concerns. If the vx turn out to be harmful as is almost certainly the case, the idea that it was the "least bad" option is still a terrible excuse.
You can tell me til you're blue in the face he had no other options - but then why continue to push it? Now that they got their way and Trump is out, why doesn't Trump say, "You know, this vaccine appears to be killing people? The medical community lied to me, they lied to you and we need an investigation?"
And even if you think that's a bad idea, how about Trump just stop saying how proud he is of Warp Speed? In the EU, millions of people have been harmed by the vaccines and tens of thousands are dead. When we know Ivermectin would have avoided almost all of this.
Great idea
I have a question though on one tiny part of your post
Please tell us what, why? This is amazing. I have brutal allergies and this would be a God send.
Thanks
Quercetin, Bromelain, Zinc, and Vitamin C.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040248821A1/en
Lupus is when the immune system attacks itself, not unlike any other massive allergic response.
I will say though, Glucosamine is what really put me over the hump and got me mowing the lawn again. Don't take it if you have shellfish allergies or are taking insulin, though.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12176986/
Allergies are an immune OVER-response. If you kill immune cells off (allergy shots) by overstimulation, you have no over-response because nothing is cleaning the pathogens out of your system to gauge a response. No symptoms, no problem, right?
Wrong.
As soon as your immune system begins to heal, it sends out signals to all cells to attack the pathogen via a cytokine storm. Imagine you go blind so you stop dusting your house. One day you get your sight back and then realize...
Dust.. DUST EVERYWHERE! BURN IT WITH FIRE. And you burn your house down.
Your body does the same after the allergy shots "wear off"; it freaks out and then, since every cell is covered with the allergen/pathogen, it begins to tear itself apart, literally.
So, you take the above, as immunosuppressants/immunoregulators and when your immune system slowly comes back online, instead of seeing all the dust and freaking out, it effectively gets a shot of valium and is able to clean house at a steady and tempered rate.
Th2 immune cells, in particular, are responsible for the allergic and viral responses while Th1 usually deals with bacterial. Glucosamine suppresses Th2 over Th1, which is why it helped me so much. I don't need to take glucosamine every day now, because my Th2 and Th1 levels have balanced out.
Th1, to be clear, antagonizes Th2 (Th1 goes up, Th2 goes down, Th2 goes up, Th1 goes down). So you never want one to be too high or too low. That's why you need an immunoregulator.
Quercetin comes in as an immunoregulator with the entry catalysts of Bromelain and Zinc while Vitamin C helps replenish your cell count, and the end result is a bill of clean health, so long as you don't overstimulate your immune system to the point of death again and restart the cycle.
Hope this helps.
Wow..I didn’t expect such a thorough post…thank you SO much Fren. I am going to save this.
Lots of links, here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27187333/
Wish that would work on my family. Praying they will stay safe, been 2 months since they had the Moderna shots.
Interesting point about liability - I thought the manufacturers had total immunity.
Just liability, if you wanna get technical.
If anyone can prove before a court (after getting the impossible to attain "legal standing"), seeking proper remedies, to the effect, that the manufacturers were KNOWINGLY negligent in how they have been running the clinical trials or that they were not forthright with the possible side-effects given existing medical studies, they lose their immunity.
Liability would still stand, very loosely, but it can be challenged further after the precedent case.
States could probably stick the final nail in the coffin, because they would be the ones to absorb liability costs to their citizenry when the truth comes out. Since they are the party that would sustain damages, they would (should) have standing to seek proactive remedies in the court.
If a State AG agrees to sue to shift liability back onto the manufacturer, the manufacturers (Big Pharma) will go down very quickly or face possible LEGAL charges rather than just the CIVIL cases they are looking at here in the near future.
Thanks!
Never knew Trump gave them total immunity from liability.
Why did he do that?
Maybe they wouldn’t release it as an “emergency” vax unless he gave them that coverage from their crimes?
I can’t wait for the movie to be over so I can read the FOOTNOTES of WTH was actually going on?
Exactly.
Not gonna throw Trump under the bus.
Not gonna blame him for something he did not do.
PREP Act from 2005 and EUA establish blanket immunity from liability.
It seems to me Trump only avoids blame if those agents/agencies and moles in his administration are prosecuted as co-conspirators. Part of willful misconduct is [knowingly] withholding information from the President and feeding him false data.
"blanket immunity from liability."
You gotta read the legalese there.
"blanket immunity" and "blanket immunity from liability" are two completely different concepts.
If they had "complete immunity" that would include not only liability but also any and all reproach after the fact. Pretty much no politician would let that through, even a Democrat, because it basically puts the immune party (Big Pharma) in complete control of the government, and Democrats, while corrupt, aren't corrupt enough to give up ALL their power and leverage, even to their direct benefactors.
"immunity from liability" on the other hand means it is a limited immunity, therefore it is still revokeable if the other facets of immunity hadn't also been defined.
Read the intro to the PREP Act.
That supports my previous assessment.
Ah yes, very good, thank you for the clarification. Perhaps I should have said “sweeping” immunity.
yes, technically liability is limited, but the standard to prove willful misconduct is so onerous on the injured party as to be nearly impossible to make a claim.
Yup. That's why I'm not holding my breath.
If everyone has equal standing, then the courts can easily argue no one has standing. See how that works? I can't wait until the "standing" debate is settled and judges finally start taking cases instead of shrugging them off.
good insight.
Oh my goodness!
The problems people are having are from willful misconduct!
We should look into that.
Might be able to prove it.
Of course we can prove it, if they would let it get that far.
But we won't have standing, either because we filed too early or filed too late. No matter what, we can't file because "fuck you that's why."
Which means no discovery.
Which means no evidence.
Which means no proof.
Ah, that makes sense, thanks.
I thought the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program pretty much wiped out the pharmacy companies' liability for vaccines since the 1980's. I don't agree with the program, but I don't think the Covid Vaccine liability waiver is much out of the ordinary.
Well, if you can manage to reclassify the Covid "vaccine" as something OTHER than a "vaccine" then you can completely ignore the waivers.
That's probably why they've been forced to change the definition of a vaccine.
Perhaps why it needed a waiver of its very own...
Brilliant!!! Absolutely brilliant!!!
This is an excellent entry for a Trump hater. Nicely done.
Do you have any sources on Ivermectin, HCQ, and Quercetin stopping the damage from the vaccines? I’d be really interested in reading that.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871846/
Tons of studies like this. Use keywords: "ivermectin guards ACE2 receptors"
Key to it's ability to stop virus is the ability to play linebacker for the ACE2 receptors.
Both the virus and the "vaccine" cause the most damage by the spike protein lodging itself into the ACE2 receptors and getting stuck, thereby encouraging clotting of the cells where ACE2 receptors are present, like in the heart.
If Ivermectin works for one because it blocks spike proteins from getting into the ACE2 receptors, it will work for the other.
Thank you very much. That does make a lot of sense. One thing I wonder is if somebody who got the vaccine would have to permanently take ivermectin, since my understanding is that the jab makes your cells start producing the spike protein.
Spike proteins aren't alive. So, in absence of their production by host cells, will eventually diminish in number either by wiggling their way out of the body, or being expelled by the kidney/live processes.
Ivermectin may only be necessary up until all the spike proteins wiggle their way out.
That is, assuming vaccinated fools do stop producing them.
It won't help with any damage they've already sustained, however. Physical damage and scarring from clots and inflammation isn't so easily remedied.
If you're wondering where the "miracle drug" Ivermectin was found:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/
Basically, ivermectin isn't even really that synthetic. It is just like any other flavonoid. If you eat enough Japanese soil you probably would have negligible effects, though, but if you make an extract it is effectively identical to ivermectin.
Keep in mind, distillation and extracts are different processes, so don't think boiling dirt and then popping it in a centrifuge is gonna get you the same results. There are a few more steps involved, but nothing that is molecularly "synthetic."
Thank you very much for the information.
What are you talking about? You can't blame Trump for that. Those companies have had free rein for decades.
True, but in the noodle-brain liberal, if you don't preface any argument with "Orange Man Bad" they will immediately tune you out.
They've been programmed. If you want to get through the firewall, you have to trojan-horse your arguments.
That's the point of my post.