As well as the division you mentioned, this is the other objective. They've got the normies with division, they'll try to get critical thinkers with smoke and mirrors. With all in chaos they are able to carry on.
That entire Trump pushing the vaccine thing is perplexing to me. If it's as bad as they say, why did he push it to get Emergency Authorization without proper testing.
I agree with this assertion 100%. It was the horrible choice he/they had to make. I think the prolonged covid-terror campaign was also a plan to illicit a violent uprising by Patriots after the entire economy was quickly destroyed/badly damaged and we decided enough is enough (masks/lockdowns/no school/limited business/ect). That would have opened the door for 'emergency measures' to suspend the ENTIRE Bill or Rights ... under the guise of 'Public Safety'.
There are several theories about that but bottom line is it doesn't make sense. I don't know why he pushed it and bragged about operation warp speed. I guess we'll know at some point in this plan.
Fear mongering from either side should be considered with skepticism. Whenever a topic induces fear, it's time to step back and carefully assess the facts.
I've been taking vitamin D supplements for about three months.
I had blood taken for an annual check-up last week and my doctor prescribed emergency vitamin D script which I filled and ate.
This was the first time in my life I have ever been given such a script... and this was AFTER I'd been taking vit D supplements for the first time in my life.
I wonder if my doctor was trying to save me from the COVID bioweapon?
If you were only taking 1,000 IU daily, which is most of the OTC Vit D sold at stores, that would not be enough to bring your levels up - especially if you only started 3 months ago. Actually, your levels were probably really in the tank before you started if you still tested low. Cancer risks are much higher in people with very low Vit D levels. All kinds of conditions have shown that higher Vit D levels equate to better outcomes. The research is out there but it is not widely disseminated among professionals. Vit D is fairly cheap and only sick people are money makers. Know your levels and always get copies of your blood work. Patients need to educate themselves and be a participant in their own health.
Maintenance dosage can be around 5,000 IU daily once optimum levels have been reached. This can vary depending on weight and how fast someone is utilizing it. I have had some patients that required 10,000 IU a day. Vit D is a fat soluble vitamin and can be taken in larger amounts at one time versus water soluble vitamins that must be acquired daily. The body stores fat soluble vitamins whereas water soluble are not. Water solubles are usually excreted above whatever the body cannot utilize. This is why prescription Vit D is usually 50,000 IU. As long as a person does not have a Vit D allergy, a person can safely take large amounts of Vit D daily for months before even getting close to toxic limits. Optimum Vit D levels to deal with a variety of medical conditions should be somewhere around 70 to 80 ng/ml. I have been hearing recently that to combat COVID, whatever it turns out to be, the levels may even be as high as 90 to 100 ng/ml. I still need more data before making such a recommendation - but it certainly is not going to be harmful.
Most allopathic clinicians are still determining appropriate blood Vit D levels with whatever parameters the lab sets as a range. Many clinicians simply look for the "L" and "H" on test results without really knowing what an appropriate level should be. Many of these labs set the upper limit at between 20 to 30 ng/ml. Those levels are too low. Most clinicians are not schooled in nutrition and usually adopt whatever guidelines the ivory towers of medical science dictate. Some of us have been hammering the need for higher Vit D levels for decades and have been redicules for it. We have made some progress, but it has not gone far enough in order to get from the world of research into practical application to improve the health of the public. Vit D is just one of many nutritional battles to be fought. Good luck.
What was your level, do you know? Was it way low? Just wondering. I've been taking it since last December. I wonder if regular supplements are really that good or is there a specific brand we should be taking.
I believe that the cabal actually wants anecdotal evidence out for us to share. Evidence that doesn't mean anything to the normies, because it can easily be dismissed as fake or as a rare occurance.
Remember that they want to discriminate and de-humanize us. If there are no examples of the vaccine harming anybody, then horror of horrors, the red-pilled Trump supporters might actually vaccinated. That would ruin their plans.
For example this crisis actor video designed to freak us out:
They cleaned it up to make it less crisis actorish.
But why don't they delete it when I can get my entire account banned for mentioning Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine?
Because they want us to reject the vaccine. They want to single us out and ban us from air travel, then shopping at the mall, then eventually have our cell service and internet shut off.
I except your theory, but we can't have it both way. We can't on the one had ascribe nefarious intentions to youtube (Google) by claims youtube is banning the truth, and then turn around and tag them with equally bad motives for some key truths.
I mean I am now finding lots of Dr. Peter McCullough videos on youtube that I though had been deleted.
I've noticed this too about YT sometimes, I'd like to think there is some patriots stealthily working at youtube, or at least neutral parties that don't like censorship.
Maybe some liberals who work at youtube got red pilled.
My take. We are in a phase of the operation where the sheeple have taken the vax as ordered. Now the powers-that-be need to tease out the remaining resisters. If you are logged into Google, such as staying logged in to use your Gmail, Google knows exactly what you are viewing on their properties including YouTube. My feeling is that they are compiling a list of people who are viewing anti-vax videos. That list is a very good one for the door-to-door people to work from. So it's putting out the cheese see who takes a bite.
I don’t subscribe to YouT ube, I just visit sometimes, mostly for music. The funny thing is the suggested videos below the one I’m watching lately have been ALL anti covid vax, 3g dam/floods, and anti China. It’s like they aren’t censoring that stuff at all. Doesn’t matter what I’m searching for. Could be how to DIY or puppies or nukes. I clear my search history there all the time and on my phone but the same edgy stuff comes up. It’s like there are two yutubes? One that censors the crap out of Trump, conservatives etc and the other that is pushing the other viewpoint. Idk?
It's just like Twitter in that Donald Trump Jr. is still there. How has he not been removed? It makes me question who is really in control and is this part of the plan. Thousands of Trump supporters removed but not his son, come on, he says some big truths too on all subjects. I had a measly 25xx followers but I get removed.🙄
They haven't fixed the algorythm for that yet it would seem.
Still have to scroll down to page 8 before seeing a single legit flat-earth-proof video (David Weiss), so yea, they are still in censorship mode. Just not on vaccine damages, maybe.
They can't censor the truth they can try they can try but when it becomes obvious yes they already know they're part of a class action lawsuit Eventually they had to give in
My guess is there are still tons of vids still up about various topics but the search algorithm had been set up not to find them, maybe it's being tweaked somehow?
As well as the division you mentioned, this is the other objective. They've got the normies with division, they'll try to get critical thinkers with smoke and mirrors. With all in chaos they are able to carry on.
That entire Trump pushing the vaccine thing is perplexing to me. If it's as bad as they say, why did he push it to get Emergency Authorization without proper testing.
I agree with this assertion 100%. It was the horrible choice he/they had to make. I think the prolonged covid-terror campaign was also a plan to illicit a violent uprising by Patriots after the entire economy was quickly destroyed/badly damaged and we decided enough is enough (masks/lockdowns/no school/limited business/ect). That would have opened the door for 'emergency measures' to suspend the ENTIRE Bill or Rights ... under the guise of 'Public Safety'.
There are several theories about that but bottom line is it doesn't make sense. I don't know why he pushed it and bragged about operation warp speed. I guess we'll know at some point in this plan.
The question we should ponder is what would have happened if he didn’t do what he did. We’d still be locked down and at this point probably starving
Fear mongering from either side should be considered with skepticism. Whenever a topic induces fear, it's time to step back and carefully assess the facts.
I hear you! Did Flynn ever bash the vaccine? Sometimes I look at the Patriots and t their clarity, and it helps me with my clarity.
Perhaps the (((owners of Google))) or the (((CEO of YouTube))) are spooked by President Trump's lawsuit against online censorship?
I'm even finding videos like these:
Vitamin D and COVID 19: The Evidence for Prevention and Treatment of Coronavirus (SARS CoV 2)
Tucker: What is the actual death rate of COVID-19?
Public hesitant to get vaccinated after news of post-vaccination deaths
Doctor Joseph Campbell vids on Ivermectin efficacy
I did not expect to find vids like these.
I've been taking vitamin D supplements for about three months.
I had blood taken for an annual check-up last week and my doctor prescribed emergency vitamin D script which I filled and ate.
This was the first time in my life I have ever been given such a script... and this was AFTER I'd been taking vit D supplements for the first time in my life.
I wonder if my doctor was trying to save me from the COVID bioweapon?
If you were only taking 1,000 IU daily, which is most of the OTC Vit D sold at stores, that would not be enough to bring your levels up - especially if you only started 3 months ago. Actually, your levels were probably really in the tank before you started if you still tested low. Cancer risks are much higher in people with very low Vit D levels. All kinds of conditions have shown that higher Vit D levels equate to better outcomes. The research is out there but it is not widely disseminated among professionals. Vit D is fairly cheap and only sick people are money makers. Know your levels and always get copies of your blood work. Patients need to educate themselves and be a participant in their own health.
Maintenance dosage can be around 5,000 IU daily once optimum levels have been reached. This can vary depending on weight and how fast someone is utilizing it. I have had some patients that required 10,000 IU a day. Vit D is a fat soluble vitamin and can be taken in larger amounts at one time versus water soluble vitamins that must be acquired daily. The body stores fat soluble vitamins whereas water soluble are not. Water solubles are usually excreted above whatever the body cannot utilize. This is why prescription Vit D is usually 50,000 IU. As long as a person does not have a Vit D allergy, a person can safely take large amounts of Vit D daily for months before even getting close to toxic limits. Optimum Vit D levels to deal with a variety of medical conditions should be somewhere around 70 to 80 ng/ml. I have been hearing recently that to combat COVID, whatever it turns out to be, the levels may even be as high as 90 to 100 ng/ml. I still need more data before making such a recommendation - but it certainly is not going to be harmful.
Most allopathic clinicians are still determining appropriate blood Vit D levels with whatever parameters the lab sets as a range. Many clinicians simply look for the "L" and "H" on test results without really knowing what an appropriate level should be. Many of these labs set the upper limit at between 20 to 30 ng/ml. Those levels are too low. Most clinicians are not schooled in nutrition and usually adopt whatever guidelines the ivory towers of medical science dictate. Some of us have been hammering the need for higher Vit D levels for decades and have been redicules for it. We have made some progress, but it has not gone far enough in order to get from the world of research into practical application to improve the health of the public. Vit D is just one of many nutritional battles to be fought. Good luck.
What was your level, do you know? Was it way low? Just wondering. I've been taking it since last December. I wonder if regular supplements are really that good or is there a specific brand we should be taking.
I doubt the masters of the universe would be spooked by a lawsuit in such an early stage.
Could it be that the entire vaccine mandate is a red herring designed to take our focus away from what is really happening elsewhere.
I believe that the cabal actually wants anecdotal evidence out for us to share. Evidence that doesn't mean anything to the normies, because it can easily be dismissed as fake or as a rare occurance.
Remember that they want to discriminate and de-humanize us. If there are no examples of the vaccine harming anybody, then horror of horrors, the red-pilled Trump supporters might actually vaccinated. That would ruin their plans.
For example this crisis actor video designed to freak us out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0g-RYlyYOA
They cleaned it up to make it less crisis actorish.
But why don't they delete it when I can get my entire account banned for mentioning Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine?
Because they want us to reject the vaccine. They want to single us out and ban us from air travel, then shopping at the mall, then eventually have our cell service and internet shut off.
I except your theory, but we can't have it both way. We can't on the one had ascribe nefarious intentions to youtube (Google) by claims youtube is banning the truth, and then turn around and tag them with equally bad motives for some key truths.
I mean I am now finding lots of Dr. Peter McCullough videos on youtube that I though had been deleted.
And even this Dr. Robert Malone interview:(last week I think) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E2UkhCWosg
Here is the Peter McCullough video on vimeo
https://vimeo.com/553518199
It's pretty long. Here is a shortcut to where he talks about the fake paper in Lancet:
https://vimeo.com/553518199#t=40m1s
Here is doctor Dr. Byram Bridle explaining how the vaccine is harmful to some people:
https://vimeo.com/557428309#t=1m32s
Here is former Pfizer exec Dr. Micheal Yeadon:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Ci2jK1yFoOd/
Short Version
https://rumble.com/vih0k3-dr.-michael-yeadon-final-warning.html
It’s all a movie. YT is under control of Trump and the whole exercise was to Wake Us The Heck Up. At least that’s my opinion
let me try to upload election fraud videos 10 times i have been banned the last 8 months
I've noticed this too about YT sometimes, I'd like to think there is some patriots stealthily working at youtube, or at least neutral parties that don't like censorship.
Maybe some liberals who work at youtube got red pilled.
Yeah, that job must be a sizable suppository redpill experience.
😁
My take. We are in a phase of the operation where the sheeple have taken the vax as ordered. Now the powers-that-be need to tease out the remaining resisters. If you are logged into Google, such as staying logged in to use your Gmail, Google knows exactly what you are viewing on their properties including YouTube. My feeling is that they are compiling a list of people who are viewing anti-vax videos. That list is a very good one for the door-to-door people to work from. So it's putting out the cheese see who takes a bite.
That's a thought.
Wonder if normies get successful searches for "subversive" material?
Maybe the only people who do are those who have already established a pattern...maybe they don't let you out of your pattern.
I don’t subscribe to YouT ube, I just visit sometimes, mostly for music. The funny thing is the suggested videos below the one I’m watching lately have been ALL anti covid vax, 3g dam/floods, and anti China. It’s like they aren’t censoring that stuff at all. Doesn’t matter what I’m searching for. Could be how to DIY or puppies or nukes. I clear my search history there all the time and on my phone but the same edgy stuff comes up. It’s like there are two yutubes? One that censors the crap out of Trump, conservatives etc and the other that is pushing the other viewpoint. Idk?
It's just like Twitter in that Donald Trump Jr. is still there. How has he not been removed? It makes me question who is really in control and is this part of the plan. Thousands of Trump supporters removed but not his son, come on, he says some big truths too on all subjects. I had a measly 25xx followers but I get removed.🙄
Really good point.
They haven't fixed the algorythm for that yet it would seem.
Still have to scroll down to page 8 before seeing a single legit flat-earth-proof video (David Weiss), so yea, they are still in censorship mode. Just not on vaccine damages, maybe.
They can't censor the truth they can try they can try but when it becomes obvious yes they already know they're part of a class action lawsuit Eventually they had to give in
They cant get to everything. Remember the algorithm is run by real people. Its not just an automatic process
I thought the lawsuit was forcing These platforms to take people back? Folks should repost their videos, simply to get the word out.
Trumps lawsuit!
My guess is there are still tons of vids still up about various topics but the search algorithm had been set up not to find them, maybe it's being tweaked somehow?
Most likely, the bots that flag stuff for YT can't keep up any longer. That, or we've taken back YT, which I doubt.