Why do you think they call Q + anons "a cult"? You do realize this is what they said about Jesus, and also the Christians in Roman times?
"Cult" is just another word used by the Deep State/Church/Clowns to control the narrative and prevent people from thinking outside their rigid cubicle.
See my essay regarding the use of the word "Cult" and you may notice the similarities between how "Cult" was introduced in the 70's for religious control, and how "Conspiracy Theory" was introduced in the 60's for political control.
(I have friends who have been involved in certain "cults" and know how the deprogramming work is essentially MK Ultra techniques applied to break the person's faith.)
My final point, there is a lot of work of God and Christ outside of the "Christian" sphere. It is possible that Buddhism, Confucianism, Zoroastrianism, etc, all founded around 400 years before Christ, were actually laying the groundwork in those parts of the world so that when Christ arrived, people would not be total barbarians.
Anyway, You shall know them by their fruits, and the fruits of the Epoch times are excellent and supportive of the freedom that God imparts to all men and women.
The whole thing about Falun Gong being a Chinese cult thing was CCP propaganda being spread to suppress the opposing party to the CCP. If you read into the history and do bit of research, you'll find out it wasn't a cult but a group of people practicing qi-gong (similar to TaiChi), and then they managed to get some people to say some nutty things to make it look like a cult.
The only time I go to MSM is when I need to do research on their fuckery. Even so, any longer than a few minutes and I start to break out in hives. I don't agree with it, and it doesn't agree with me. Its a mutual hate-hate non-relationship.
My Century link and Bing streaming "news" is an eye opener with the obsessions they have against Trump and their strident voices are cracking... In quieter and more rational times it would be called yellow sheet journalism; now, yellow sheet journalists have more credibility...
Aye. Former Congressman Ron Paul is much more principled and never compromised or played politics. Unfortunately that meant that, had he ever actually become President like we'd always dreamed of, he would've likely been dragged into a cruel battle with the Deep State and face some ruinous fate like a JFK-style assassination. Because of the corruption of the DS, the current office of US Presidency cannot accommodate only the idealism that made Ron Paul popular: he needed teeth, and he lacked it. At the very least with his run, he awakened many to the ideals of freedom, truth-seeking, and upholding the constitution, and many such individuals ultimately helped Trump in his presidency.
Senator Rand Paul, on the other hand, is playing the nastier long game of politics like President Donald Trump has been doing so far. I think he is potentially as principled as his father, but his compromises make him seem like a sell-out no matter the actual long-term strategic value of his moves. His method of spreading the word is subtler, with him engaging more in rhetoric and dialogue rather than Ron Paul's clear-cut "this is how it should be in line with the Constitution" messaging.
With that said, I would actually pick Rand Paul over Ron Paul for the "non-ideal" US Presidency, because he is a shrewder man than Ron Paul with both skin and teeth to survive. (Of course, between the two Pauls and DJT, I would always pick DJT for the real non-ideal presidency, and Ron Paul for the ideal swamp-free presidency). I also suspect that Rand Paul's certification was coordinated in some way with Trump and the white-hats, because of how white-hat-esque his moves other than the certification are, and how potentially necessary the certification might've been for the Plan to run smoothly.
The only argument I can find against term limitations is/was Ron Paul. Truly an honest politician. You may have to go back to Jefferson to find another.
Tucker Carlson also. He was part of a hit piece on Ron Paul's campaign in Vegas. He got some Vegas Strip sex workers to show up at Dr. Paul's speech, scantily clad. 60 minutes was there and this is how they introduced Ron Paul to the world. Until that airing, non of the networks would even mention him.
After that airing, I had trouble talking about my hero to my circles. (I've followed Dr. Paul since 1988 when he first ran for President in 1988 as a Libertarian). My christian friends and homeschooling mom friends kept saying he paired up with scantly clad women, that he stood with them, his arms around their shoulders, with a big grin. That 60 minute airing was a hit piece. I later found a picture of Hannity, tho, in that exact pose that my brainwashed friends thought Dr. Paul did. I think he visited the same ladies, possibly the same time frame.
ClA rich boi Tucker Carlson betraying us was honestly a bigger surprise - I was only shocked Hannity tried to pander to us for as long as he did. I think most of us saw this coming, if not expected it much sooner.
Its not what they said. Its once someone gets the VAX they can't not tell you to also be like them. He is just justifying what he did. Also its the "RIGheft" thing to do. Tucker is trying to earn his stripes back still. Good luck to someone who tucks their balls between their legs the first go around at truth and honesty.
If you have no money to spare, GAW is your best source of news (with a healthy dose of self-research to trust but verify, of course).
If you do have money to spare, subscribe to OAN and/or Epoch Times. You will be supporting ACTUAL journalism.
Epoch is owned by a weird Chinese cult I wouldn’t trust them
I am a Christian, and I love the Epoch times.
Why do you think they call Q + anons "a cult"? You do realize this is what they said about Jesus, and also the Christians in Roman times?
"Cult" is just another word used by the Deep State/Church/Clowns to control the narrative and prevent people from thinking outside their rigid cubicle.
See my essay regarding the use of the word "Cult" and you may notice the similarities between how "Cult" was introduced in the 70's for religious control, and how "Conspiracy Theory" was introduced in the 60's for political control.
(I have friends who have been involved in certain "cults" and know how the deprogramming work is essentially MK Ultra techniques applied to break the person's faith.)
My final point, there is a lot of work of God and Christ outside of the "Christian" sphere. It is possible that Buddhism, Confucianism, Zoroastrianism, etc, all founded around 400 years before Christ, were actually laying the groundwork in those parts of the world so that when Christ arrived, people would not be total barbarians.
Anyway, You shall know them by their fruits, and the fruits of the Epoch times are excellent and supportive of the freedom that God imparts to all men and women.
Peace.
https://www.reddit.com/user/FractalizingIron/comments/coe7qq/i_am_a_proud_member_of_the_qanon_cult/
Enemy of my enemy.... the falung gongers are with us; they're pro Trump and they're fighting the CCP.
The whole thing about Falun Gong being a Chinese cult thing was CCP propaganda being spread to suppress the opposing party to the CCP. If you read into the history and do bit of research, you'll find out it wasn't a cult but a group of people practicing qi-gong (similar to TaiChi), and then they managed to get some people to say some nutty things to make it look like a cult.
The only time I go to MSM is when I need to do research on their fuckery. Even so, any longer than a few minutes and I start to break out in hives. I don't agree with it, and it doesn't agree with me. Its a mutual hate-hate non-relationship.
My Century link and Bing streaming "news" is an eye opener with the obsessions they have against Trump and their strident voices are cracking... In quieter and more rational times it would be called yellow sheet journalism; now, yellow sheet journalists have more credibility...
So right!
Once he shit on Dr.Ron Paul in 2012 has lost my patronage. He is a deep state pacifier. A paid shill. A fucking cunt
Hear hear, also a Ron Paul fan, thanks for reminding me.
The better of the Pauls
Aye. Former Congressman Ron Paul is much more principled and never compromised or played politics. Unfortunately that meant that, had he ever actually become President like we'd always dreamed of, he would've likely been dragged into a cruel battle with the Deep State and face some ruinous fate like a JFK-style assassination. Because of the corruption of the DS, the current office of US Presidency cannot accommodate only the idealism that made Ron Paul popular: he needed teeth, and he lacked it. At the very least with his run, he awakened many to the ideals of freedom, truth-seeking, and upholding the constitution, and many such individuals ultimately helped Trump in his presidency.
Senator Rand Paul, on the other hand, is playing the nastier long game of politics like President Donald Trump has been doing so far. I think he is potentially as principled as his father, but his compromises make him seem like a sell-out no matter the actual long-term strategic value of his moves. His method of spreading the word is subtler, with him engaging more in rhetoric and dialogue rather than Ron Paul's clear-cut "this is how it should be in line with the Constitution" messaging.
With that said, I would actually pick Rand Paul over Ron Paul for the "non-ideal" US Presidency, because he is a shrewder man than Ron Paul with both skin and teeth to survive. (Of course, between the two Pauls and DJT, I would always pick DJT for the real non-ideal presidency, and Ron Paul for the ideal swamp-free presidency). I also suspect that Rand Paul's certification was coordinated in some way with Trump and the white-hats, because of how white-hat-esque his moves other than the certification are, and how potentially necessary the certification might've been for the Plan to run smoothly.
The only argument I can find against term limitations is/was Ron Paul. Truly an honest politician. You may have to go back to Jefferson to find another.
hey... but he is a 7 year trained martial artist who roofed houses in the hot sun and tended bar...
AOC haha!
Tucker Carlson also. He was part of a hit piece on Ron Paul's campaign in Vegas. He got some Vegas Strip sex workers to show up at Dr. Paul's speech, scantily clad. 60 minutes was there and this is how they introduced Ron Paul to the world. Until that airing, non of the networks would even mention him.
After that airing, I had trouble talking about my hero to my circles. (I've followed Dr. Paul since 1988 when he first ran for President in 1988 as a Libertarian). My christian friends and homeschooling mom friends kept saying he paired up with scantly clad women, that he stood with them, his arms around their shoulders, with a big grin. That 60 minute airing was a hit piece. I later found a picture of Hannity, tho, in that exact pose that my brainwashed friends thought Dr. Paul did. I think he visited the same ladies, possibly the same time frame.
ClA rich boi Tucker Carlson betraying us was honestly a bigger surprise - I was only shocked Hannity tried to pander to us for as long as he did. I think most of us saw this coming, if not expected it much sooner.
Its not what they said. Its once someone gets the VAX they can't not tell you to also be like them. He is just justifying what he did. Also its the "RIGheft" thing to do. Tucker is trying to earn his stripes back still. Good luck to someone who tucks their balls between their legs the first go around at truth and honesty.
Hehehe tucker tucks Too little too late tucker
From the same Hannity that said FBI are mostly peaceful. Hannity another clown