ARIZONA SHARPIE MARKER CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT! CONTACT jaysekulow.com
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
It's almost like the Left set themselves up. If they knew the paper was not the right kind with the fake imported ballots; then why did they insist people use the sharpies. I know it was to bleed through so the vote counters could abjudicate them; but geez, I wonder if they even thought about getting caught with this scheme?
They didn't think we'd want to look.
They've always looked at us as if we were stupid. They always tend to think they are smarter than us too. The thing is, "THEY HAVE NO COMMON SENSE." That's why we are smarter than them.
They operated boldly out in the open for so long that they got sloppy. Now they are like cats in a sandbox on a windy day. No way to cover up all their shit.
Aaahhhh 👆🏼
Please explain your use of "abjudicate".
It means: To reject by judicial sentence
In this case it means that one of the elections employees gets to determine the "intent" of the voter, since the machine couldn't accurately read it. Ripe for fraud.
It's far worse than that. In AZ they also printed the ballots with the alignment offset (so the bubbles and text moves to right/up/etc). This meant that when they bled through the other side, they visually look like they aren't bubbling in something on the reverse, BUT the machine thinks they bubbled it in (because the machine doesn't look at what is printed on the paper, just where it expects the bubble marking to be). In the AZ testimony they were showing it basically caused Republican votes on one side to trick the machine into counting a Democrat vote on the other side (Democrat votes on one side turned into Independent votes, Independent votes got thrown out).
Many where I remember reading a few posts on the day where they were told to use sharpies.
I saw a video where a voter confronted an elections official and pointed out on the ballot where it said not to use a sharpie and showed that she was given a sharpie to vote. The woman got all flustered, looked down and then walked away.
Yes quite a few commented on it as they were telling people to bring their own pens. The point being is the use of the Sharpie bleeds through the ballot and spoils it meaning it goes to a hand adjudicator, the ones the Zuckerberg paid for who is alone and does the adjudication! Hence a vote for Trump goes to Xiden. That's what Zuckerberg paid for.
Same here.
I'm in a smaller county in AZ and recall being given some kind of felt pen, not sure a sharpie but not a ball point pen.
Anyone else go with you? It's how they got many to be adjudicated by 1 person, who was paid.
I hope they have that email where they were using ballpoint pens, but told everyone they needed to use sharpies on election day.
Ummm....how to contact? I was on the website, filled out a form under his blog area to be contacted about polling interference, and it wouldn't allow be to submit. Has anyone figured out how to contact Jay Sekulow re: this?
Almost August!! CANT WAIT!!!
These are the asshats that are running the world. Go get your 20 cents from this lawsuit and remember, BYOP. bring your own pen.
Correct! I voted the last "early day", only ball point pens, just as the pre-election pamphlets stated for "how to vote". Same precinct, election day, ONLY SHARPIES which did bleed through (and poll workers were questioned). Chandler, AZ South East Maricopa County. Pretty conservative.