Dr Peter McCullough usually goes out of his way to avoid any thoughts of conspiracy but he can spot the link between vaccines and the stakeholders. Go to his answer at 1:30:49 - but the whole thing is worth watching if you have the time.
Yes, I know. My take is that he is actually very careful in what he says and does. He makes sure that no-one can point the finger and say: Conspiracy theorist or other things like white supremacist, anti-vaxxer, anti science etc.
All the interviews of his that I have heard go straight down the middle and if asked leading questions about the conspiracy he always evades. This interview was as close as i have heard him get to saying their is a conspiracy.
His thinking may be that as long as he does not go out on a limb he will be allowed to talk and so remain useful.
So hey, this brand new car design has exploded every time we try and do a basic run.
Brilliant, send the build to production and get marketing ready for the big launch day!
They are premeditated, cold blooded murderers. Whats the point of safety tests if you just abandon doing them? A stance utterly incompatible with any vaccine mandate also - its a pretty easy case to be made that government, business, airlines, sports etc are all getting in on the murdering also.
So hey, this brand new car design has exploded every time we try and do a basic run.
Can they sue us?
No.
Brilliant, send the build to production and get marketing ready for the big launch day!
I kept showing stuff like that to friends and family but basically everyone's response was "BUT NOW IT'S APPROVED". And it felt like they were upset, because I didn't want them to be protected. These people won't wake up untill they experience it.
They started the animal testing and did a fair amount
They never published any results
They stopped the animal testing and went to human trials
So one of two things would have happened:
If the animal tests showed promising results (i.e. they didn't kill the animals or cause serious side effects) they would have continued the testing and/or published the results as it would have helped the narrative that they are safe. They didn't publish or continue so we know this didn't happen.
If the animal tests had bad results (i.e. it killed the animals) they would stop the animal testing.
So while there isn't documented proof that the animals were dying or having serious side effects, it's the only logical conclusion based on the vaccine company actions.
If you subscribe to the theory that this is a depopulation event then, the animals dying was the result they wanted. And, even if it wasn't the reaction they wanted they still used the information garnered from those "failed" test and used it, learned from it. I've thought this for a while now, that they know exactly what is going to happen to people that get the jab and that it's a deliberate act.
Reminds me when India was pissed after people were showing up with polio after the polio vaccine. They asked Gates about it and he said, "Well, I guess they need another rounds of vaccines."
Read that in some article awhile back and no it isn't important enough for me to dig it up.
Kind of like Fauci saying, we don't know how these vaccines are gonna effect kids, so we better run a study injecting kids with the vaccines.
My husband just recently was employed by the VA. He believes they are going to make it mandatory soon. Is that legal? Does the VA have different laws they must abide by?
And this is only round 1. Boosters will be the next open air lab test.
Dr Peter McCullough usually goes out of his way to avoid any thoughts of conspiracy but he can spot the link between vaccines and the stakeholders. Go to his answer at 1:30:49 - but the whole thing is worth watching if you have the time.
At 1:36;20 he says about 70% of his patients have taken the vaccine, he's very pro-vaccine and that he has taken all the vaccines. Hmm.
Yes, I know. My take is that he is actually very careful in what he says and does. He makes sure that no-one can point the finger and say: Conspiracy theorist or other things like white supremacist, anti-vaxxer, anti science etc.
All the interviews of his that I have heard go straight down the middle and if asked leading questions about the conspiracy he always evades. This interview was as close as i have heard him get to saying their is a conspiracy.
His thinking may be that as long as he does not go out on a limb he will be allowed to talk and so remain useful.
They are premeditated, cold blooded murderers. Whats the point of safety tests if you just abandon doing them? A stance utterly incompatible with any vaccine mandate also - its a pretty easy case to be made that government, business, airlines, sports etc are all getting in on the murdering also.
One small adjustment:
I kept showing stuff like that to friends and family but basically everyone's response was "BUT NOW IT'S APPROVED". And it felt like they were upset, because I didn't want them to be protected. These people won't wake up untill they experience it.
Some people are actually glad to be in this testing phase. Helping humanity and such. They will never wake up.
I just try to direct vax heads to the actual vax companies websites and see for themselves when the trials end.
I've actually gotten quite a few "ohhh what the actual fuck?" responses.
Remind folks they were approved for emergency use only. Direct folks to the vax makers websites and SHOW THEM when the trials end.
You vaxxed idiots ARE THE TRIALS.
link?
http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14472&format=pdf
What we do know is the following:
So one of two things would have happened:
So while there isn't documented proof that the animals were dying or having serious side effects, it's the only logical conclusion based on the vaccine company actions.
If you subscribe to the theory that this is a depopulation event then, the animals dying was the result they wanted. And, even if it wasn't the reaction they wanted they still used the information garnered from those "failed" test and used it, learned from it. I've thought this for a while now, that they know exactly what is going to happen to people that get the jab and that it's a deliberate act.
Save the animals!
Save the Baby (and older child) humans!
Is this real? Where is the original full version?
I can't say that this audio has anything to do with this video. Who is speaking? Where in the video?
https://rumble.com/vgwc25-doctors-testify-to-texas-state-senate-to-oppose-mandatory-covid-shots.html
Since this is a link to twitter, I happened to look what was trending Aaaaandd....
"A mixed AstraZeneca-Pfizer shot boosts COVID-19 antibody levels by six times, study shows"
The insanity just will not fucking stop. This has to be a fucking nightmare.
Reminds me when India was pissed after people were showing up with polio after the polio vaccine. They asked Gates about it and he said, "Well, I guess they need another rounds of vaccines."
Read that in some article awhile back and no it isn't important enough for me to dig it up.
Kind of like Fauci saying, we don't know how these vaccines are gonna effect kids, so we better run a study injecting kids with the vaccines.
Yes, they want the children dead.
My husband just recently was employed by the VA. He believes they are going to make it mandatory soon. Is that legal? Does the VA have different laws they must abide by?
I know some folks in the VA, they are saying it is looking like they will mandate it very soon.
The biological warfare is not the virus (which is just the flu, rebranded), it’s the jab.
"Safety, Shmafety. Kids are animals too!"
I got an offline copy of it in case anyone wants it,
Should be using murderers and rapists instead. Better data too.