Here's your red pill for the day. Pass it on to your acquaintances, there are plenty to go around.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
I think I'm gonna make these daily, just a simple thing to keep me on my toes.
Try to ask the medical person administrating the vaccine what is in it. They won't tell you nor give you any papers documenting what's in it.
From what I've seen of medical people they don't know crap, and I'm saying that as someone who is a nurse. Everyone just does what they're told. Went to one of those walkin clinics in May, asked the doc if she could prescribe some Ivermectin.She looked me right in the eye and said, no Ivermectin is very dangerous. Funny how it wasn't dangerous a few years ago when the facility where I worked had a Scabies outbreak. They were handing them out like candy.
Thalidomide. Short memories.
I don't understand. :(
Pass a bill to see what's in [what]?
The bill.
The unofficial motto of these big bills, popularized by Nancy Pelosi is "We have to pass the bill to see what's in it."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uC4bXmcUvw
It's a saying that's caught on since Obamacare.
Congress makes bills so big that no one can read it in the time they have to decide on whether or not they want to pass it. Effectively, every bill that has been signed into law for the last 30+ years wasn't even fully read before it was passed. That's corrupt as hell.
Obamacare, for instance, originated in the house as a housing bill that was butchered and added on to until they shoved in enough to rebrand it as a healthcare bill.
OK, thanks. Unfortunately, that's way too obscure to use in my part of the world.
This article breaks it down well.
https://www.citizensjournal.us/18-reasons-i-wont-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine/
From Article:
Or if you want to read the individual studies you can check out these links:
In 2004 attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets
In 2005 mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated
In 2012 the ferrets became sick and died. And in this study mice and ferrets developed lung disease.
In 2016 this study also produce lung disease in mice.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC525089/
https://www.nature.com/news/2005/050110/full/050110-3.html#ref-CR1
https://www.pnas.org/content/102/3/797
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2016.1177688?scroll=top&needAccess=true
You are correct, but I doubt you know by how much.
Claims they have "isolated" Sars-CoV-2 are false.
They used a computer model they purchased from the Chinese that has been in use using since the original SARS was isolated to perform all these studies. They only modified a few proteins they deemed "most likely to change in nature" in their process feeds.
No animal studies, to date, have included the Sars-CoV-2 virus. All studies prior to 2020 have used the previous model. All past 2020 that do include animals, if they exist at all, have not been published, so no formal records can be cited.
Even the "vaccines" are built on this model. If they made the assumption that the Sars-CoV-2 virus occurred naturally, on top of using an outdated model of the original SARS virus, the will fail to account for the gene editing done in the Wuhan Lab.
Summarily, the "vaccines" cannot and will never were able to treat the actual virus because their models are inherently flawed due to being based on what is effectively an entirely different virus AND not accounting for genes edited by Wuhan mad scientists.
Calling bullshit.
Yeah from what I’ve seen, all the test animals died once exposed to the virus again
This 👆🏼
Ok I want sauce. Never heard that and fyi we don’t just buy counter-claims around here we provide data.
SHILL.....!!
WWG1WGA