There are. And that's wonderful; they're truly blessed if they're able to stay at home, have a good husband who makes enough for them to do so, and it's what they want to do. Everyone's different, and it's not in the cards for all women.
Women who don't work can make a big difference. My minister (a female) said, "If you ladies think men are bastards, ask yourselves who raised them." Also, the Women's Christian Temperance Union reduced the alcoholism rate in the US from 25% to 10%, which made a huge difference. Now it's time to go on the war path about drugs.
I respect that it’s not - I am not judging anyone for their decision to work either. I would just venture to note that society’s view that women can “have it all” is a lie. Somewhere there will be sacrifices made - either at home or at work. It’s a question of values and principles. One must choose - both spouses working or one staying at home.
I would agree that the "having it all" view is a misnomer. Do I "have it all"? No. Most people's definition of having it all includes a lot of material crap that I couldn't care less about. I'm not driving a new car, I'm not being taken on vacation every year, I don't have a room for all my shoes, etc. The things that matter to me are taken care of, and that's what's important. Could we get along with just my husband's income? Probably. We'd be shitting thin, though, and neither my husband nor I want to cut it that close. Then, when something happens (water heater breaks, furnace craps out in winter, etc.), you don't have the money to fix it. We live modestly but comfortably. We have no car payments, not a lot of debt (nothing I couldn't pay off at the drop of a hat), and we live within our means. So I don't really think that fits the definition of "having it all" that most would hold in this society.
I’m not trying to drag them in the mud. What they do is incredible. If it fulfills them, that’s what matters.
My brain goes haywire if it doesn’t have something cognitively challenging to do. I wouldn’t be happy just staying at home.
That’s all I’m saying—that lumping all women into one category and saying that’s their only option and what they SHOULD do is just as ludicrous as mandating everyone get vaccinated.
Nothing in life is one size fits all—aside from accepting Jesus as your savior if you’re Christian. Even then, your relationship with God is yours and yours alone.
Everyone makes the choices that they think are best for their individual families. I don’t see women being “lumped” back into being stay-at-home moms anytime soon, so if I were you I wouldn’t worry about that at all. This world is going downhill fast and the NWO wants moms (and dads) away from their kids so that they can work more than anyone else. In the 80’s women/moms were pushed into the workforce in record numbers and they were lied to about formula being better for one’s baby than breastmilk. Nowadays, many women are beginning to wake up. But many women are also coming to the sad realization that they couldn’t afford their lifestyles, homes, food on the table if they don’t contribute to the household income either. We “little” people do the best we can with what we’ve got. But I think it’s safe to say that the world controllers do not want the best for us “feeders.”
lumping all women into one category and saying that’s their only option and what they SHOULD do is just as ludicrous as mandating everyone get vaccinated
BRAVO!!!! I could not have said that better myself!
There’s a lot of highly educated, strong, free-thinking stay-at-home moms that like to cook too, FYI!
There are. And that's wonderful; they're truly blessed if they're able to stay at home, have a good husband who makes enough for them to do so, and it's what they want to do. Everyone's different, and it's not in the cards for all women.
Women who don't work can make a big difference. My minister (a female) said, "If you ladies think men are bastards, ask yourselves who raised them." Also, the Women's Christian Temperance Union reduced the alcoholism rate in the US from 25% to 10%, which made a huge difference. Now it's time to go on the war path about drugs.
Where did the decades-long "war on drugs" get us?
I respect that it’s not - I am not judging anyone for their decision to work either. I would just venture to note that society’s view that women can “have it all” is a lie. Somewhere there will be sacrifices made - either at home or at work. It’s a question of values and principles. One must choose - both spouses working or one staying at home.
I would agree that the "having it all" view is a misnomer. Do I "have it all"? No. Most people's definition of having it all includes a lot of material crap that I couldn't care less about. I'm not driving a new car, I'm not being taken on vacation every year, I don't have a room for all my shoes, etc. The things that matter to me are taken care of, and that's what's important. Could we get along with just my husband's income? Probably. We'd be shitting thin, though, and neither my husband nor I want to cut it that close. Then, when something happens (water heater breaks, furnace craps out in winter, etc.), you don't have the money to fix it. We live modestly but comfortably. We have no car payments, not a lot of debt (nothing I couldn't pay off at the drop of a hat), and we live within our means. So I don't really think that fits the definition of "having it all" that most would hold in this society.
Good for you guys. I think it’s all by design that it’s nearly impossible for a family to live on a father’s income alone anymore.
Mortar
Pestle
Olive oil
Garlic
Basil
Pine nuts
Grana Padano
Pecorino Romano
Salt & Pepper
…It is I who have it all frens!
I’m not trying to drag them in the mud. What they do is incredible. If it fulfills them, that’s what matters.
My brain goes haywire if it doesn’t have something cognitively challenging to do. I wouldn’t be happy just staying at home.
That’s all I’m saying—that lumping all women into one category and saying that’s their only option and what they SHOULD do is just as ludicrous as mandating everyone get vaccinated.
Nothing in life is one size fits all—aside from accepting Jesus as your savior if you’re Christian. Even then, your relationship with God is yours and yours alone.
Everyone makes the choices that they think are best for their individual families. I don’t see women being “lumped” back into being stay-at-home moms anytime soon, so if I were you I wouldn’t worry about that at all. This world is going downhill fast and the NWO wants moms (and dads) away from their kids so that they can work more than anyone else. In the 80’s women/moms were pushed into the workforce in record numbers and they were lied to about formula being better for one’s baby than breastmilk. Nowadays, many women are beginning to wake up. But many women are also coming to the sad realization that they couldn’t afford their lifestyles, homes, food on the table if they don’t contribute to the household income either. We “little” people do the best we can with what we’ve got. But I think it’s safe to say that the world controllers do not want the best for us “feeders.”
BRAVO!!!! I could not have said that better myself!