This to me is the single biggest piece of circumstancial evidence that the military is acting independently where it counts. Obama failed to fire him when he was running things, then 4 years of all out lawfare during Trump's 1st term, and the General is still standing.
I'll bet you anything that Obama and Biden would have siezed on any opportunity to silence "The Man Who Knows Where the Bodies are Buried" once and for all, or at the very least get him back in front of a judge, where they could enforce a gag order against him. The Myanmar comments would have been the perfect chance to do so whether they actually had a viable case or not.
But that would require them to actually have control.
Also the fact that Trump and his whole family are all free and not indicted.
Yeah thats how I keep one of my friends here from becoming fully black pilled.
Agreed, not to mention flynns brother was given Command of U.s. forces Pacific. He controls all military directly in his sphere against the Chinese. Navy, Marines, Airforce and Army. Assigned this position after Biden supposedly became president. As if Joe Biden would place Flynns brother in that position. They fuck with Flynn his brother can wipe them out. Chinese will perceive flynns brother in that position for that very reason.
Key phrase: against the Chinese
Ding Ding Ding! Good post and comment btw. This is a good third line to any response to "Trump would be dead." Which is a good second line response to "Flynn would be dead."
Good point.
It's the same reason that got me thinking if they believed Trump and his followers were a threat to the country, why do they never shut down those massive rallies where they claim he's spreading lies and turning the people against the government?
Because they can't
Yes... America's favorite General!
Why would Flynn be court martialed, he's no longer ib the military. It's called freedom of speech.
I am not American so I am not sure,but I was reading somewhere former US military are judged by military courts. After small research I have articles about that:
https://fedsoc.org/commentary/fedsoc-blog/the-prosecution-of-military-retirees-under-the-uniform-code-of-military-justice
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/01/29/military-retirees-can-be-court-martialed-after-all-appeals-court-decides.html
https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/what-happens-when-service-members-past-or-present-breach-their-sacred-oath/
so well also u/SpoonySmalls : yes,you can't court martial civilians... Can Flynn be defined as civilian ? XD
Simply thing that those all traitors are unable to accuse Flynn of treason and sentence him despite fake news of MSM claiming almost such things...
He can be recalled to service and then tried.
Officers commissio s do not expire. They are often activated for special assignments after retirement.
https://fedsoc.org/commentary/fedsoc-blog/the-prosecution-of-military-retirees-under-the-uniform-code-of-military-justice
I disagree. Arresting him has no legal basis and arresting him would turn him to marauder and energize/ unify our side. They want to make our elections seem okay to the normies and arresting a general for that is bad optics. The left doesn't hate Flynn like the do Trump. My 2 cents is that is pretty bad example and I could think of better. Like that Flynns brother is currently in charge of pacific and gained an extra star.
You can't court martial civilians.
He’s not a civilian, he is retired military. They can still be subject to court martial.
https://fedsoc.org/commentary/fedsoc-blog/the-prosecution-of-military-retirees-under-the-uniform-code-of-military-justice
No, only under specific criteria. I spent 24 years in. In order to fall under Courts Martial after retirement, you must transition into a reserve status. Even then, if some violation is committed, the violation must be dealt with at the lowest level possible in accordance with the UCMJ. Only in an egregious and felonious act against the United States would a Courts Martial even be put on the table and, even THEN, a last resort option.
Flynn used his 1st Amendment right to finger, factually, an issue. Not a Courts Martial offense.
Read the link you supplied in full. Pretty much lays all this out in legalese.
Thanks for helping draw the distinction. We are in weird territory when the actual lawyers and courts don’t apply the law appropriately and we are left to try to make sense of it here.
All good. Military vs Civilian confuses a lot of people and that's ok, some of it confuses even Military peeps. 😉👍
they already went after him in civilian court.
Thanks for the enlightenment! I was unaware.
Explain the mandatory death jabs for the military.
that's easy they are scheduled for SEPTEMBER! 😃😃😃😃😃 Lets see who is in command in September. also an article said mil would offer exemptions for several reason.
The Big Event (reinstatement djt) due before implementation in September?🤞
nope