It's a huge gamble by all parties. They do in fact have Dominion claiming that their machines can not be hooked to the internet. There "appears" to be fairly credible evidence to the contrary.
That all being said, discovery is a bitch. Either they have the goods on Dominion or they don't. Dominion may be forced to turn over software/hardware that to date they have claimed as proprietary property. This could be the biggest trap set for a company ever, it's certainly one of the most public.
but the motion to dismiss would remove the possibility of discovery.
or is the implication here that Dominion sued simply to test them on whether they would try to dismiss and you think they tried to dismiss to make Dominion think they have nothing and to bait Dominion into proceeding with the suit.
It would be cool to compelled Judge Nichols to render an opinion after reviewing the three audits conducted in Maricopa County. I would wish for him to opine on the Pro V&V audit, the SLI Audit, and the Senate's Audit. I think such an opinion would be very revealing. To do less is to reveal bias in favor of Dominion, and I would seek recusal on that basis.
Although Judge Totenberg ruled to allow the Dominion System to be used in the Nov 3, 2020 election, she voiced real concerns, stating the “risks are neither hypothetical nor remote.”
She also noted that Jack Cobb, the director of Pro V&V, “plainly indicated that he actually claims no specialized knowledge or background in cybersecurity engineering and did not himself perform any security risk analysis of the BMD [Ballot Marking Device] system.” Instead, “State Defendants relied on Dr. Coomer’s testimony, to address—based on his professional experience—some of the significant cybersecurity issues raised by Plaintiffs.”
It's a huge gamble by all parties. They do in fact have Dominion claiming that their machines can not be hooked to the internet. There "appears" to be fairly credible evidence to the contrary. That all being said, discovery is a bitch. Either they have the goods on Dominion or they don't. Dominion may be forced to turn over software/hardware that to date they have claimed as proprietary property. This could be the biggest trap set for a company ever, it's certainly one of the most public.
but the motion to dismiss would remove the possibility of discovery.
or is the implication here that Dominion sued simply to test them on whether they would try to dismiss and you think they tried to dismiss to make Dominion think they have nothing and to bait Dominion into proceeding with the suit.
Well, Lindell did counter sue so that makes it a bit different, I think.
Interesting thought
Is that you Eric?
It would be cool to compelled Judge Nichols to render an opinion after reviewing the three audits conducted in Maricopa County. I would wish for him to opine on the Pro V&V audit, the SLI Audit, and the Senate's Audit. I think such an opinion would be very revealing. To do less is to reveal bias in favor of Dominion, and I would seek recusal on that basis.
He must consider what Judge Totenberg said about Pro V&V. https://greatawakening.win/p/12jvyq3pbF/repost--maricopa-audit-on-my-min/c/
https://themarketswork.com/2020/11/20/the-small-world-of-voting-machine-certification/#:~:text=She%20also%20noted%20that%20Jack%20Cobb%2C%20the%20director,of%20the%20significant%20cybersecurity%20issues%20raised%20by%20Plaintiffs
Court battles are costly and time consuming. He's suing them also right? Wouldn't discovery happen either way?
We say we look forward to discovery
SOP