...The hearing will address Judicial Watch’s argument against the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) attempt to close the case and withhold a full, unredacted version of the EC. In May 2020, Judicial Watch obtained a redacted version of the EC, which was written entirely by former FBI official Peter Strzok.
Judicial Watch filed the September 2019 FOIA lawsuit after the DOJ and FBI both failed to respond to identical July 11, 2019, FOIA requests, which asked for access to a single record: “The Electronic Communication that initiated the counterintelligence investigation of President Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:19-cv-02743))
In its effort to close the case, the Biden DOJ argues that there is not significant public interest in the full contents of the EC that initiated the counterintelligence investigation of former President Trump’s campaign and Russian interference in the 2016 elections...
Added bold letters. Perhaps a few thousand phone calls, and e-mails would be sufficient to demonstrate "significant public interest?"
So the release of the electronic communications from a spying incident that occurred 5 years ago? Why not charges and hearings on the traitors in our government that authorized this treason?
I believe in certain punishment for violations of criminal statutes--especially when it involves treason.
Yep, buckle up buttercups.
https://qposts.online/post/2054
First day of National Preparedness Month.
u/#q2054
Added bold letters. Perhaps a few thousand phone calls, and e-mails would be sufficient to demonstrate "significant public interest?"
Do you have that info, or know where to get it? Not really sure who to get hold of TBH...
So the release of the electronic communications from a spying incident that occurred 5 years ago? Why not charges and hearings on the traitors in our government that authorized this treason? I believe in certain punishment for violations of criminal statutes--especially when it involves treason.
The "justice" system is pointless if it takes this long to get around to actually meting out justice, if they even ever get around to it.
Does somebody have points of contact to call email or write
I think the best thing to do is get ahead of it! Waiting to “see how it goes” has gotten us where we are today
Who is the judge? What court is this in?
Oh man, not the court I was hoping for. Super lib judges there.
5 years later...
Yeah yeah
Let me know when they chop the stupid diagonal leg off that R.
Q Post; C before D. [Covid before Declass?]
LOL that C has "stood for" a number of things since that Q drop, but I can only remember "Comey report" right now for some reason
Berry berry innnteressssting
I always suspected this.
I love that picture of POTUS. I distinctly remember that part of the rally and confidence he radiated.
Yep. I totally agree. He had Dragon Energy oozing from every corpuscle....
Oh this is a good one.
Wait so its today??
👀😮
Fortnightfags unite! :)
A fortnight is two weeks, so expecting "something to happen" in two weeks is fortnightfagging
A fortnight is fourteen days. Two weeks.
Fortnite is a video game
Lol no worries
6 years later, and a hearing is scheduled to consider releasing ....
Two more weeks might be right for once.
This is very close to datefagging. The audit had a date too. Won't they just delay this?
What is the latest word on the hearing??
This didn't age well...