So Let Me Ask
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (147)
sorted by:
because the 2 buildings, which fell first, fucked up the 3rd building, which fell later from that damage
security cameras are mounted high (to keep them secure) and pointed down (where the people are), there would be zero reason to have security cameras installed that were intended to look at the sky just in case a savage with a boxcutter flew a passenger jet into the building. the only reason we have the 2 or 3 frames of the blurry plane hitting the building is because it was from a gate keypad camera (like you see at the drive up ATM or air tubes) that was mounted at car window level designed to take low res vid of peoples faces as they access the gate... so it captured stuff in the background.
there was pieces of both planes recovered from both sites, the 4th planes debris field was scattered over a large area because it was shot down mid-air by the 180th ANG fighter wing out of swanton ohio. they picked it up after it looped out over lake erie (near davis bessie nuke plant) headed back to washington and they waited till it was over an unpopulated area to shoot it down. "lets roll" is bullshit.
please stop, this is embarrassing to even ask, please understand that structural steel doesn't need to melt in order to fail, being softened by fire is enough to lead to collapse when you account for the insane weight and forces bearing down on those heated steel superstructure components. heat + force is how you make things with steel, it's been that way for much longer than you've been alive.
they absolutely did, we had ANG in the air.
everyone responsible didn't get promoted, they died in the plane crashes.
because sadam violated 17 UN resolutions and it became part of the "war on terror" when we began cracking down on violent/radical islam because some of them flew planes into our buildings. he also gassed the kurds and had mobile biochem trucks.
people hijacked planes that were headed to the west coast (so they would be carrying a full load of fuel) and slammed them into buildings, two of those buildings then fell and fucked up a 3rd building next to the other 2.
because it's designed to make you look like a retard for not coming to the above conclusions on your own, it's the same reason people come here and claim the earth is flat... so that anyone who questions government gets called a crazy person...
thanks for that btw.
You haven't explained the actual melted steel yet, though. How did that happen?
You wrote all of that, just to defend some of the worst criminals in history. I hope you washed your hands, cause they're filthy.
what melted steel?
i want to see pictures of the solidified molten chunk of melted steel that was craned out of the bottom of that "bathtub" that the WTC was built in. i want video of it getting craned out of the hole.
just because some COINTELPRO agent told you that someone saw "a moletn pool of metal" doesn't mean it happened when there is zero pics or video of it while it was molten or after it would have cooled.
it would have been one of those cheesy memorials somewhere.
why can't you show me that picture or video? (because you are wrong).
Apparently you have literally never watched any of the 9/11 videos.
Because this is literally your very first post asking for it, you fucking spaz. Shut your fucking mouth before you stick your foot in any further. I can not only show you pictures, I can show your stupid ass video of molten steel.
Since you were so kind to ask for it, and then very forcefully re-ask, acting as though I had time to respond to you in-between your next paragraph like an ACTUAL retard, here you go:
You don't deserve to be awake, by the way. <---- It's right here. Since you were too stupid to find it the first time around.
https://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/12/why-was-there-molten-metal-under.html
not one picture or video, just a bunch of links to people making claims
so just as i suspected, thanks for absolutely nothing of value
Please name the 17 UN resolutions+provide sauce+provide link. Thank you.
no, you do it, just google it. "saddam violated 17 UN resolutions" it was the reason they went. it's not a secret.
I don't do Google searches, but my search yielded this site. The disparity between the link title and the article text made me go hmmm. I wondered why it said 17 in the headline and sixteen in the article.
https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/iraq/decade/sect2.html
it's always been "17 UN violations" anytime i've ever heard anyone talking about it.
the UN let him stay in power so long as he stuck by a whole bunch of rules...
he didn't
point 1: take a look at the arieal photo: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/67/Ground_zero_aerial_view.png In the top left quadrant we see 2 standing buildings with holes in their roof, and further to the top left corner we see a pile of rubble. It's irrational to think wtc7 in the top left corner would fall to rubble while the 2 buildings closer to ground 0 would have just some holes in their roof. Result: valid question.
Point 1b: to even consider your point as factual, you would need to claim there was horizontal ejection from wtc1 & 2, and that energy would have had to come from somewhere to send a piece from (here) ------------------------> (to here)
Point 2: there was a security footage, but was scrubbed/cut leading to suspicion.Result: valid question.
Point 3: not nearly enough debris was found to suggest a plane, however scattered debris indicated placements. In the Pennsylvania crash, magically the plane was swallowed up by the whole ground and caved back in, which would be impossible even if it was flying down perfectly perpendicular to the ground. Result: valid question.
Point 4: Jet fuel cannot melt steel. Even if it could, there's not nearly enough jet fuel in a plane to weaken steel in the 1st to 80th floor, significantly below the impact, so that wtc1 and 2 could completely collapse to the ground floor. Result: valid question.
point 5: misdirection, while they were in the air, NORAD was up north in war games. Result: valid question.
Point 6: further misdirection: people living were promoted.Result: valid question.
Point 7: 'they didn't attack SA because saddam was bad man' doesn't answer the question. . Result: valid question.
Point 8 - dismissed not question related
Point 9: ad-hominem response Result: valid question.
BTW thx for that
explain that please.
the gov came in a snatched up all available cameras in hopes of finding evidence of what the fuck happened and who did it... they don't return it... it's all sitting in a box somewhere in a basement probably. either way lack of evidence isn't evidence.
there was a massive debris field in PA, they blamed it on wind but they found metal parts scattered all over that area... it's very mountainous out that way... near a couple ski resorts... there was debris everywhere and it only happens that way if the plane fell apart in the sky... from being blown the fuck up.
nobody says it has to melt, all you have to do is get it hot and hammer on it (force), it's how swords have been made for thousands of years.
180th ANG was in the air while the 4th plane was headed to DC... they are who shot it down.
you're assuming these "promoted people" were responsible... thats ridiculous. the people who did it were in the planes
the question was why iraq, the answer is violating multiple UN resolutions and running terrorist training camps and having WMD's, and having gas trucks, and gassing the kurds, and flying over the line he wasn't supposed to fly over... etc... etc... you can't say i'm wrong about the first half of the question because you were hoping i would answer the other half.
(you're not good at this)
Explain why WTC 7, if damaged in that bottom corner, and were to fall, did not topple, and instead came straight down? Unexplainable without demolition or at least explosives.
Cameras: who knows what's on it except those who have seen it.
PA flight 93 debris field? yes.. it's massive /s
More misdirection. floors 1-80 were built to hold the upper floors up. no fire was there, no fuel was there. why would they suddenly give way?
emergency crew was supposedly scrambled.
you're assuming that. people were promoted, and evidence points to it's likely they knew what was going on beforehand.
the question was why not Saudi Arabia. 'iraq is doing something we don't like so we went there instead' isn't valid.
(you're horrible at this)
I think he helped write it.
thats an ironic statement
don't you find it odd that whenever someone wants to discredit any conspiracy theory... they go after the trifecta... 9/11 inside job, flat earth, holocaust denial.
if i say we shot the 4th plane down, people think i'm a some kind of dumb piece of shit who thinks the earth is flat.
it's done on purpose.
it's called "poisoning the well" and it's part of COINTELPRO
it's how they burned jones with sandy hook