THIS. IS. MASSIVE. 💣
Strangely, not headline news in MSM...
Director and Deputy Director of the Office of Vaccines Research at the FDA RESIGN.
And then...
They sign this letter in prestigious British medical journal The Lancet advising against COVID booster shots
(threadreaderapp.com)
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
From their Lancet article
But there is plenty of word circus in there, about how the vaccine is not effective against mild infection, but great against serious infection, but also that its hard to interpret observational data.
The authors are twisting their own conscience to tell themselves that what they have done so far is great, but they dont want to kill more people with boosters. Or the threshold of murder at 2 doses is acceptable for them, but not what happens at booster.
They’re twisting in the wind. Hang em HIGHER.
But regardless this is a great way to redpill normies who dont read anything other than "approved sources"
I have written a more in depth analysis of the article, and I don't believe your characterization is valid. The two aknowledge the risks but prempt it by stating the positives far outweigh the risks.
Most of the pro-vaccine positions in the article exist so that their anti booster position can not be claimed to stem from being anti covid vax. That's very common when you're about to publish something heretical.
What this is really about is their first red pill - there's no evidence that boosts make any goddamn sense, but for political reasons the FDA is pushing it on them to agree with it. Why is that they wonder? Look it all these reasonings we will now give as to why this doesn't make sense!
But they are shaking their fists at the night. Facts and data don't matter, never did, and their next step should be to wonder if the 'positive' data they approved in the past was all fraudulent bullshit,a nd all that changed is that the powers that be are too impatient now to wait for the plausible deniability studies to enact the next stage.
This is partly true, but here is my question - do you really think after they finally jolted awake that boosters are obviouslt bad (even to their threshold of whats bad) AND they resigned their positions as a result, that they have not already started to wonder about the first two doses?
I thin partly they are still trying to convince themselves that they didnt do anything wrong until now, its just the boosters that are bad.
This is a psychological subconscious defence mechanism. Accepting you did wrong is bad enough, but accepting you did wrong to the point of murdering people is almost impossible for most minds to accept. They will rationalise anyway they want. Infact, coming out against boosters is a big part of rationalising they are not evil. Internally the thinking goes "See, I am willing to sacrifice my career over boosters. No way I could have gone along with murder ever"
I know people like these. They may fight as much as they like about boosters, but they will defend the original vaccines with their lives. I hope I am wrong, but we will see.
Oh I'm sure they have. But as you note, if it was all a lie then they were unknowingly complicit is some soul crushing approvals and advisories. I don't think they are there yet. That's hard to accept. It's going to take a lot of research and investigation before they are ready to accept that possibility themselves, let alone try and publish literal heresy supporting it.
These higher up positions are political, even if you're an honest scientist filling them. You have to have political skills. So they know they lose nothing extolling the vaccine if it buys them the necessary capital to have additional boosters pushed back on.
The whole article is littered with reasonings that even the staunchest pro covid vax supporter can get behind. "The boosters are more effective used on the unvaccinated" comes to mind in particular.
Their goal is to convince the world not to pursue endless rounds of boosters, (and I think this articles makes the case for it, if it would ever be reported on) while pushing back on the vaccinations, even if they are already there, can come later.
"The positives outweigh the risks" has been their go to excuse for promoting the shots for months now. Yet, the known treatments and preventative measures are still not discussed by these people, which tells you everything you need to know about them!
Absolutely correct! This is just a CYA. These are the people who have access to the best data available (Medicare/Medicaid data, EMRs, CVS records, etc.) on the adverse events caused by the jabs. And, they have to know that their cost/benefit analysis is seriously out of whack because of the diagnostic failings of PCR testing. I suspect they're opposing boosters, because the sudden deaths will really increase with the third dose (and they would be blamed).
Here's an FDA/CDC ppt, outlining their original data collection plans for the vaxx. Of course, the public has access only to VAERS:
https://files.catbox.moe/u3x13i.pdf
I wonder if any of the medical clowns involved with all this knew about the benefits of vitamins D and C in boosting immune response, and just hid it because it would bite into their money/power grab, or if they were just ignorant of basic, non-pharma-based, health.
Thank you for doing what you do, apt username. I remember the lancet posting some of the same propaganda.
The mental gymnastics of sociopaths and psychopaths really are a sight to behold. Unfortunately, they disproportionately call way too many shots right now (pun intended) so one element of the GA for me has to include a country-by-country global commission that weeds them out of EVERY functional aspect of life on earth. Maybe we could devise a test but one that actually works 100% every time.
he is saying the current vaccines are good enough.
also this
also his main worry seems to be that he wants vaccines to go to poor countries that haven't gotten any.
peak globohomo
globohomo who has reached his conscience limit