I haven't seen much posted about any clinical studies for using Remdesivir for Covid, specifically. Since it is the "standard of care" in most hospitals (due to demands from NIH), we should know if there is any SCIENCE to back up these mandates.
I found a couple of interesting studies.
(1) This one used Remdesivir in one group and placebo in another group. The only real analysis was how long it took the patient to get out of the hospital or moved out of the Covid wing of the hospital to another area of the hospital. This is subjective, to say the least.
The only real difference was the group who got the drug were "cleared" in 10 days, and the group who got nothing were "cleared" in 15 days.
They then went on to do a COMPUTER MODEL to claim that Remdesivir would "likely" lead to better outcomes regarding recovery and avoiding death. But they have no evidence of this. It's just a computer model.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
(2) This one is a review of multiple studies for Remdesivir, and then they arrived at conclusions based on what they saw overall in the group of studies.
Based on the currently available evidence, we are moderately certain that remdesivir probably has little or no effect on all-cause mortality at up to day 28 in hospitalised adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection. [This means: It does NOT prevent people from dying.]
We are uncertain about the effects of remdesivir on clinical improvement and worsening. [This means that the review of MULTIPLE studies show NO benefit.]
There were insufficient data available to validly examine the effect of remdesivir on mortality in subgroups depending on the extent of respiratory support at baseline. [This means that not enough evidence exists to determine if Remdesivir is either safe or effective for "sub-groups" (elderly, children, pregnant women).]
Bottom line: Remdesivir is NOT proven effective in providing ANY benefit to SARS-CoV-2/Covid 19 patients.
Science!
Before it was approved for EUA, the FDA website posted the single study where Remdesivir was used along with other medications in a trial for Ebola. Remdesivir had to be pulled from the study because too many patients were dying.
There is science. It shows a 50% mortality rate in Africans they gave it to for Malaria. It causes renal failure, pneumonia and then death
There was some science alright, but it is probably concealed now. The science says that shit was what was causing kidney failure in those it was given to, which led to fluid retention, which led to a ventilator, which led to them dying.
That fucking Fauci knew these facts, and recommended it anyway because he is making money off it.
It had the same result in a study on ebola, until they pulled it early.
Isn't this the stuff Trump took when he got Covid?
Regeneron.
And Remdesevir:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/20/remdesivir-dont-use-drug-trump-took-for-covid-19-who-says
Interestingly, at the time, the WHO was saying don't take it.
Maybe he got both.
Yes, Trump took both Regeneron and Remdesivir. You can do a search for "Trump + Remdesivir" on Youtube and find several videos of him saying how well Remdesivir worked for him.
Thank you for posting this.
I just got out of the hospital for Covid with pneumonia. I was given remdesivir. Then I saw this video https://www.vtvault.org/treatment
Now, in my medical records, it shows that I have cirrhosis of the liver, bradycardia, and my heart rate was in the low 60s, dropping to the 40s at night. Trust me, I haven’t been in shape for a decade. Remdesivir is bad juju! Ask for ivermectin or hcq. Anything but Fauci the Butcher’s money making drugs.
Doc, I appreciate that you’re asking questions, and being open minded. This interview isn’t definitive proof of anything, obviously, but it’s certainly interesting, and worth listening to.
https://rumble.com/vjls2p-doctor-exposes-fauci-premeditated-murder-with-multiple-cocktails-for-treatm.html
You are putting the cart before the horse. Where is the clinical evidence that Remdesivir is safe and effective for use in SARS-CoV-2 patients?
Anecdotal evidence proves nothing -- says the medical industry. ;-)
You didn't respond to my question.
Where is the clinical evidence that Remdesivir is safe and effective for use in SARS-CoV-2 patients?
This is demanded of those who advocate for Ivermectin and HCQ.
We should also demand it, then, from those like you who adovate for Remdesivir.
Where are the studies?
And YOU can't have it both ways. The medical industry wants to claim that ONLY clinical trials are valid evidence of anything, and anecdotal evidence means nothing.
Until it is convenient for them to switch sides.
You don't get to have it both was.
WHERE ARE THE STUDIES?
You are the one claiming to be in the medical field, and you are prescribing a drug that appears to have NO scientific basis as to safety or effectiveness to be used in Covid 19 patients.
YOU are the one with the burden of proof here, and YOU are the one who has failed to provide any.
I'm not the one giving a dangerous drug to people without knowing anything about it.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Still waiting for you to show me proof.
In the meantime, watch this.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Chf8zg6Fl1fS/
Jesus!
Those are BOTH the SAME study -- and they are the SAME study I cited in my OP.
Clearly, you just found something and posted it.
You have NO IDEA what it says or does not say.
Serious questions: Are you actually a medical doctor or nurse, and do you not know how to read a study?
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=18505
Where are the CLINICAL STUDIES that show that Remdesivir is SAFE and EFFECTIVE at treating SARS-CoV-2?
I ask multiple times, and you keep evading the question.
Everyone reading here knows why.
No, YOU are the one ordering the prescriptions for a drug that you have NO scientific studies to support.
Which is it?
"Evidence based medicine" is about EVIDENCE (i.e. clinical trials) ... or it is about anecdotal stories?
If anecdotal, then HCQ/Ivermectin wins, hands down.
If ONLY clinical trials are considered evidence -- and that is EXACTLY the case with the American medical industry -- then why do YOU not have ANY such evidence?
Dude, that is the SAME DAMN STUDY I POSTED IN MY OP!
You're god damned right I have been confronational with YOU, not with other people.
You claim to be a "medical professional" and you have NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT YOUR ARE DOING!
You are prescribing a drug that you know NOTHING about ...
And now you prove you can't read a damn study about that drug!
All you did was post different links to the same study I cited in my OP.
If you are an example of the medical industry today, it's no wonder people like Fauci can lead you around by the nose.
FOLLOW ORDERS! That's all you seem to understand.
I feel sorry for the people you treat. They have no idea they are putting their trust into the hands of a quack.
And you really don't even seem to give a shit.