SCOTUS already punted and signalled that they won't wade into the battle (refusal to do their duty). Courts aren't going to do anything. Lindell is Big Dan Teague.
And technically, it's actually not SCOTUS jurisdiction if the charges are insurrection, rebellion and treason. See the Kavanaugh hearing with Graham's questions. We're not dealing with cases of civil law. SCOTUS has to maintain the show as not to panic the masses once military tribunals start. Populace still needs to be prepared for it.
Any idea why Grahamnesty (RIP Rush) pursued this line of questioning? With hindsight and a Q-centric view, those questions sure sound heavier than they likely would have in my “sleeping” days.
SCOTUS already punted and signalled that they won't wade into the battle (refusal to do their duty). Courts aren't going to do anything. Lindell is Big Dan Teague.
https://youtu.be/yqHvklEEr7w
Or things will be so weird in November that Roberts will eat his words
Then we will have the supreme court twice on record as failing to do their job.
And technically, it's actually not SCOTUS jurisdiction if the charges are insurrection, rebellion and treason. See the Kavanaugh hearing with Graham's questions. We're not dealing with cases of civil law. SCOTUS has to maintain the show as not to panic the masses once military tribunals start. Populace still needs to be prepared for it.
Sen Graham / Nominee Kavanaugh / Confirmation Hearing /
5 Sep 2018 / Law of War / UCMJ / Treason
https://youtu.be/4uJXFgL-wa0?t=1540 (timestamp / listen to end - 4 min, 31 sec)
Any idea why Grahamnesty (RIP Rush) pursued this line of questioning? With hindsight and a Q-centric view, those questions sure sound heavier than they likely would have in my “sleeping” days.