Exactly. But the senate president said the purpose is to just report the findings...not state conclusions...or something like that. She also said their purpose is only to ensure that future elections are improved upon. Anything fishy is left up to the AG of the state to investigate and prosecute (or not).
It's not their job to do so and they are trying to remain apolitical so fake news dont easily discredit them.
They keep reiterating they are just doing their remit/scope and not questioning if things are intentional or not. They are just presenting findings neutrally.
They are also showing the flaws in the system that could have been exploited. Made recommendations toward new legislation. Other stuff/ evidence to be turned over to law enforcement. Many of their state laws appear to have been broken.
It is in the hands of AZ Senate now to decide if there is enough to decertify the election- THERE IS!! The audit was to see if the "process" was legit - IT WAS NOT!
The crazy claims of the recount numbers being the same is getting to me. This forensic audit clearly shows duplicate ballots and people who moved away and voted there( did these vote at their new address too?), all of these are illegal ballots, lack of signature on mail in ballots also don't count. Why still counting days later and why so many of those ballots had no signature 95%. Too many questions left open. The AG better file charges.
The whole point will be to put the results in doubt with no clear winner either way. The question then becomes will they then decertify the results and if they do, with no clear winner, what happens next?
They did report evidence that will get some people arrested. They matched surveillance video with the deletion time of files, so they have been caught in the act.
That was stated at the beginning. They are merely presenting the results of their findings. It's not their job to declare a winner.
Exactly. But the senate president said the purpose is to just report the findings...not state conclusions...or something like that. She also said their purpose is only to ensure that future elections are improved upon. Anything fishy is left up to the AG of the state to investigate and prosecute (or not).
Mark Brnovich (AZ AG)
LMFAO the future of the free world in the hands of a state government that brought you beauties like John McCain.
It's not their job to do so and they are trying to remain apolitical so fake news dont easily discredit them.
They keep reiterating they are just doing their remit/scope and not questioning if things are intentional or not. They are just presenting findings neutrally.
They are also showing the flaws in the system that could have been exploited. Made recommendations toward new legislation. Other stuff/ evidence to be turned over to law enforcement. Many of their state laws appear to have been broken.
There's the key point: The findings conclusively show AZ law was broken, how it was broken, and why Maricopa's election results cannot be certified.
It's up to the AZ legislature to decide what to do with their election, and AG Brnovich to decide to prosecute the perps.
Also a model for other audits in other states.
Yes please.
It is in the hands of AZ Senate now to decide if there is enough to decertify the election- THERE IS!! The audit was to see if the "process" was legit - IT WAS NOT!
This was never about showing trump winning, it was about proving biden lost and decertifying the results
The crazy claims of the recount numbers being the same is getting to me. This forensic audit clearly shows duplicate ballots and people who moved away and voted there( did these vote at their new address too?), all of these are illegal ballots, lack of signature on mail in ballots also don't count. Why still counting days later and why so many of those ballots had no signature 95%. Too many questions left open. The AG better file charges.
The whole point will be to put the results in doubt with no clear winner either way. The question then becomes will they then decertify the results and if they do, with no clear winner, what happens next?
They did report evidence that will get some people arrested. They matched surveillance video with the deletion time of files, so they have been caught in the act.
They MUST remain unbisaed. They can NOT be accused of being biased. Present the crime, let others investigate/decertify/arrest.