I think it was in assassin's creed revelations. They have sections of the world that are like portals or rips in the matrix that can be accessed for special secrets.
The one that always stood out the most was a picture of the White House and if you were to scroll over the American Flag on top,, it would turn into the Templar flag or something like that.
As far as cultural artifacts go, the most costly, and influential are in fact video games.
Imagine if a real element of Q existed in the industry that produces the most expensive (millions to billions of dollars) cultural artifacts in the history of humanity, and was using a highly regarded, well known, high power, history oriented videogame franchise to begin waking up the youth to the concepts of fighting tyranny, facing corruption in your own home, church, and country, and that real evil exists in a real and easily definable way.
Videogames are a medium for telling a story and teaching peoole how to, hopefully, act appropriatly in life, just like books, hopefully, do. Saying it's of the devil is lazy, a straw man, and a copout.
Just because fifty shades of grey is a book, doesn't mean that all books are of the devil. After all, that would mean throwing out the Bible, because, ya know, the existence of evil books would invalidate using books to teach truth, wisdom, and righteousness right?
It’s not lazy, it’s cautious and smart. The vast majority of the gays are kind decent people but because a very small number are so sick and twisted, it’s worth lumping them all together as heathens. It’s safer that way. Same with the vaccines. Very view people have gotten sick or died of them but why even risk the tiny chance when it’s much easier and safer to just blindly reject them.
Nah, it is lazy. It's a lazy way to live. You are lazy. Your name on this board is lazy and obvious, and your shilling is lazy. Be better. Stop being lazy.
As for the LGBTQ people, judgement is God's, not mine or yours. The same judgement you mete out, the same you will receive, and it'd be a tough pill to swallow for the omnipotent father to censure you for hating and condemning any of his children without repentance and remorse.
Here's my response to your "blindly rejecting the vaccine is safe" position.
Blindly rejecting the vax, or anything without data or concrete reasons, is lazy. That's not what we do here.
If you're gonna reject something, do it with gusteau, and for a concrete reason.
The vaccines aren't being rejected for the sake of those with adverse reactions, though for many that may be reason enough, but because the data doesn't make sense. Pouring over the numbers is telling us that in the case of the "safe and effective" vaccines, they are in fact neither safe, nor effective.
mRNA codon vaccine technology is experimental. Before now, it was extensively researched, and rejected for human trials not once, not blindly, but for very concrete reasons. The Inventor of the process himself is an advocate against receiving this medical product. So, safety issues abound.
The effectiveness is then in question. After all, according to the FDA and CDC, the immunized population is not immune, not less likely to spread COVID when they have it, or to not die if they catch it. But it may reduce severity if you'd end up in the hospital. So it reduces severity of symptoms, like Tylenol for a fever.
So the vaccine isn't an effective vaccine, or even a vaccine at all. It's a prophylactic treatment against the severity of COVID, and a risky one at that in the face of a good ol tube of ivermectin.
That's a logical position on why it's rejected. Concrete, potentially flawed, but not lazy.
Tldr: the vaccine is rejected because it claims to be safe and effective. The preliminary data strongly suggests otherwise, and people can read. It's not done blindly except by lazy people. Numbers and data sourced from CDC, vaers, and FDA.
Did you know that, in the James Bond universe, the character "Q" was played by Desmond Llewelyn in 17 films?
This pic is from codex page 18. Page 17 is clearly referencing 9/11, look it up. Replaying this game post Q is fucking insane.
A lot of older games have these plots. I just played the first Deus Ex game and felt the same way.
Perhaps planting a subliminal seed in younger generations who play games? Finding those who have interest outside of popular narratives?
Metal gear solid 2 was my first major redpill, I'll never forget how I felt being ripped awake during that games ending
“Predictive programming”
I just watched Sweeney Todd and saw tons of occult references. Thanks for sharing pede, very cool!
The mystery schools have remained hidden for ages because these assholes are powerful.
I'm pretty optimistic about the whole thing.
Had similar thoughts myself. Lots of parallels to be found there...
Nice catch!
Im replaying MGS4 and noticing several connections as well. The nanotech narrative's parallels are quite stand-out.
I think it was in assassin's creed revelations. They have sections of the world that are like portals or rips in the matrix that can be accessed for special secrets.
The one that always stood out the most was a picture of the White House and if you were to scroll over the American Flag on top,, it would turn into the Templar flag or something like that.
Video games are of the devil. Leftist propaganda. You should quit and burn those games.
LOL you’re a dipshit.
Perfect response 😂
u/#bahaha
As far as cultural artifacts go, the most costly, and influential are in fact video games. Imagine if a real element of Q existed in the industry that produces the most expensive (millions to billions of dollars) cultural artifacts in the history of humanity, and was using a highly regarded, well known, high power, history oriented videogame franchise to begin waking up the youth to the concepts of fighting tyranny, facing corruption in your own home, church, and country, and that real evil exists in a real and easily definable way.
Videogames are a medium for telling a story and teaching peoole how to, hopefully, act appropriatly in life, just like books, hopefully, do. Saying it's of the devil is lazy, a straw man, and a copout.
Just because fifty shades of grey is a book, doesn't mean that all books are of the devil. After all, that would mean throwing out the Bible, because, ya know, the existence of evil books would invalidate using books to teach truth, wisdom, and righteousness right?
It’s not lazy, it’s cautious and smart. The vast majority of the gays are kind decent people but because a very small number are so sick and twisted, it’s worth lumping them all together as heathens. It’s safer that way. Same with the vaccines. Very view people have gotten sick or died of them but why even risk the tiny chance when it’s much easier and safer to just blindly reject them.
You're gonna give us all cancer with how much you're glowing, alphabet fag. Please see yourself to the door or get with the plan. Thank you 🤡
Nah, it is lazy. It's a lazy way to live. You are lazy. Your name on this board is lazy and obvious, and your shilling is lazy. Be better. Stop being lazy.
As for the LGBTQ people, judgement is God's, not mine or yours. The same judgement you mete out, the same you will receive, and it'd be a tough pill to swallow for the omnipotent father to censure you for hating and condemning any of his children without repentance and remorse.
Here's my response to your "blindly rejecting the vaccine is safe" position.
Blindly rejecting the vax, or anything without data or concrete reasons, is lazy. That's not what we do here.
If you're gonna reject something, do it with gusteau, and for a concrete reason.
The vaccines aren't being rejected for the sake of those with adverse reactions, though for many that may be reason enough, but because the data doesn't make sense. Pouring over the numbers is telling us that in the case of the "safe and effective" vaccines, they are in fact neither safe, nor effective.
mRNA codon vaccine technology is experimental. Before now, it was extensively researched, and rejected for human trials not once, not blindly, but for very concrete reasons. The Inventor of the process himself is an advocate against receiving this medical product. So, safety issues abound.
The effectiveness is then in question. After all, according to the FDA and CDC, the immunized population is not immune, not less likely to spread COVID when they have it, or to not die if they catch it. But it may reduce severity if you'd end up in the hospital. So it reduces severity of symptoms, like Tylenol for a fever.
So the vaccine isn't an effective vaccine, or even a vaccine at all. It's a prophylactic treatment against the severity of COVID, and a risky one at that in the face of a good ol tube of ivermectin.
That's a logical position on why it's rejected. Concrete, potentially flawed, but not lazy.
Tldr: the vaccine is rejected because it claims to be safe and effective. The preliminary data strongly suggests otherwise, and people can read. It's not done blindly except by lazy people. Numbers and data sourced from CDC, vaers, and FDA.
Okay Boomer 😂