Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

97
()
posted 4 years ago by nothingberg 4 years ago by nothingberg +97 / -0
29 comments share
29 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (29)
sorted by:
▲ 10 ▼
– Bruce55 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Dude, don’t make us look stupid and give the libtards reason to make fun of us - thats 11449 deaths out of 2183912 entries into the database, not global vaccines administered. One figure I saw at a glance is that there have been 3.4 billion people vaccinated globally- so if you wanna believe this who data, the death rate according to this logic is 11449/3.4 billion x 100…

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Hayle 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

VAERS is from America only, not a global reporting system. I don’t know about current vaccination numbers and don’t know if I could believe what the MSM says either way so the real answer is probably between these two bold numbers, assuming US population of 332,000,000

If 35% vaccinated 332,000,000*0.35 = 116,200,000 11449/116,200,00 = ~0.01% death rate

50% vaccinated 11449/166,000,000 = ~0.007% death rate

It’s a rough meme we’re dealing with here, sorry OP

My bad - just saw vigiaccess, I don’t think this is just American numbers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– colonial113 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Your base number is 2.183.912 - do you think a bit more than 2 million people had received the vaccine? No, this number is the total number of adverse effects reported. The real adverse effect numbers are significantly higher though due to underreporting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Slyver 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

That is not 1 in 200 of total vaxx recipients. That is 1 in 200 of total vaccine adverse reaction reports. The total number of people who have received the vaccine is in the hundreds of millions putting the "reported" death rate at much less than 0.52%.

If we assume this is based on 300M total vaccinated people (I have no idea what population they are looking at) their reported death rate is more like 1 in 30,000.

This has no meaning with regards to the real death rate. This is only what the WHO data is saying. Your interpretation is using the wrong denominator.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Slyver 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

ACCORDING TO THE WHO'S DATA THE RATE THEY PUT IS 0.5%

Yes, the deaths to total reports is 0.5%. Here's the problem with that statement. It is completely meaningless to everyone on the planet except you.

It itself is a strawman by virtue of being not relevant to anything. There is no statistical inference that can be derived from that number that has any consequence on any decision making by any policy maker. There is no red pill that can be derived from that number because it is doesn't say anything about the death rate of the vaccine to any meaningful other number.

And it makes you wrong.

I'm not wrong, because I didn't make a statement about anything. I only gave the proper context to the number. There was nothing for me to be wrong about.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– CanadianPedeMan1571 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Ok so the 2,183,912 is the number of adverse reports with 11,449 being deaths. So 0.52% of adverse reports were deaths. Not 1/200 who were vaxxed died. But don't get me wrong, that way too many deaths period and should have been shut down long ago.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Trumponator 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Exactly. I'd rather die from accidental contagion than live in fear and take the sham vaccine.

-Ron (Australia)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Heldiggrisen 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I did, and you’re still wrong.

Out of ~2.2 million adverse reactions, ~11.5 thousand was registered as the adverse reaction death.

So out of the adverse reaction group, 0.52% was death.

My guess is that the same person could have multiple adverse reactions, including death, so the number ~2.2 million was probably less people having more than one adverse reaction.

My guess is that discomfort was probably one of the adverse reaction a person had before he died, skewing the number even further.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Heldiggrisen 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Yes. The death rate was 0,52% among those who got an adverse reaction.

If you receive 2 doses you have about 1% chance og getting an adverse reaction.

Injected doses worldwide are 6,36 billion doses.

I do think the 11500ish death number is waay too low, but even with 100000 deaths out of 6,36 billion doses, it’s a 0,0016% chance of dying from the shot.

I’m not sure how to explain this to your further. You cannot have the death rate of the vaccine calculated doing deaths/adverse reactions, you need to calculate deaths/total doses injected.

Hell, even 1 million deaths from the jab will be 0,016% chance of dying from the jab (1000000/6300000000)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Heldiggrisen 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

No. You’re saying that 0,52% of the people taking the vaccine died.

That’s wrong. There are 400 millions of doses injected in the US, 2,2 million adverse effects and 11500ish deaths.

11500/400000000=0,002875% chance of dying of the shot.

2200000/400000000=0,55% chance of getting an adverse reaction

11500/2200000=0,52% chance of death IF you get an adverse reaction.

Your maths are waaaay off.

Edit: the 400 million is wrong. This database is from all around the world, and there’s so far been around 6.3 billion doses injected worldwide.

So the numbers are even lower.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Murphy71 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Now do VAERS and Yellow Card. No, seriously. Please do, and put them in this graphic side by side. I would but you have the head start and deserved right of authorship and credit for pointing out this important metric.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Trumponator 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Just wait a couple hours until the website "mysteriously" goes down.

-Ron (Australia)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– trumptruck45 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

1 in 200 isn't insignificant

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– propertyofUniverse 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It's early days, it's only going to get worse.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 5 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy