But how is he damaging the other side? The other side believes what they want and will never believe anyone on the right. Nothing anyone says for the right will damage them in any way. They have media and politicians and the entire system on their team. The only thing he's doing is saying what people on the right already believe. It doesn't effect anyone on the left. It does however make people on the right trust him for saying all the right things. So if he is a fake, they can use him to lay a trap for the right once they believe most trust him.
The point is it can be either and there's no way to know for sure, that's the point of controlled opposition, that's how it works. So you have to be on guard all the time. I personally don't trust anyone 100%. But I don't accuse everyone who agrees with me as being controlled opposition. I do however understand it's a possibility and and never rule it out. All I can do is observe and take notice if anything looks suspect.
JP made a big showing a couple years ago saying that Q was some online poster and that he had proof... the proof was some edited logs that referenced a news story that hadn't been posted yet on the date the logs showed.
JP stuck with his story and never retracted or apologized. He tried to discredit the entire Q movement... so yeah, F that guy. He is a gate keeper and grifter that can't be trusted. Just like Alex Jones. Just because he says some truths doesn't mean he is our guy or can be trusted.
Controlled opposition. Im not saying that is what Jack is, but controlled opposition stays behind enemy lines until they are told to come out of the shadows. ie Faux News. The left has known Fox was lying for a long time. We just couldn't see it because we thought they were on our side. Thats just my take on it.
I agree with you OP. I don't know, but he hasn't said anything within the last three months to make me think he's not on our side. But then, I only come across him on The Warroom.
My take is not every conservative trusts Q. There has to be people out there who connect with other forms of Trump's base, and these idiots fill that void. We don't trust them because they don't trust the plan, but as long as they keep people from the other side then they're doing a good job. Remember a lot of conservatives have taken the jab, so that should be our biggest clue we don't all think alike.
Many thought Stu Shiller (sp?) was a player, but I think he was just focused on winning his own battle and is not really vested in the war...perhaps he thinks he can be more effective after winning his battle...I think General Flynn lost a battle and became more effective in the war. Now regarding Poso, journalists can be harder to classify....he seemed pretty good from '16-20 what drives him now?
This is like saying Steve Bannon is a black hat. I listen to both on the War Room and they certainly sound based. But, I thought Pence was based, too, so nothing surprises me. Guess I’ll watch and see on Poso…like everyone else. So, far I believe he is a Patriot.
I don't trust him. But he does make based tweets for sure. Time will tell, however, who was good and who was evil.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
Controlled op. Its what the CIA does.
And he's a major douche bag.
But how is he damaging the other side? The other side believes what they want and will never believe anyone on the right. Nothing anyone says for the right will damage them in any way. They have media and politicians and the entire system on their team. The only thing he's doing is saying what people on the right already believe. It doesn't effect anyone on the left. It does however make people on the right trust him for saying all the right things. So if he is a fake, they can use him to lay a trap for the right once they believe most trust him.
The point is it can be either and there's no way to know for sure, that's the point of controlled opposition, that's how it works. So you have to be on guard all the time. I personally don't trust anyone 100%. But I don't accuse everyone who agrees with me as being controlled opposition. I do however understand it's a possibility and and never rule it out. All I can do is observe and take notice if anything looks suspect.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
JP made a big showing a couple years ago saying that Q was some online poster and that he had proof... the proof was some edited logs that referenced a news story that hadn't been posted yet on the date the logs showed.
JP stuck with his story and never retracted or apologized. He tried to discredit the entire Q movement... so yeah, F that guy. He is a gate keeper and grifter that can't be trusted. Just like Alex Jones. Just because he says some truths doesn't mean he is our guy or can be trusted.
Smart girl.
Controlled opposition. Im not saying that is what Jack is, but controlled opposition stays behind enemy lines until they are told to come out of the shadows. ie Faux News. The left has known Fox was lying for a long time. We just couldn't see it because we thought they were on our side. Thats just my take on it.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
I agree with you OP. I don't know, but he hasn't said anything within the last three months to make me think he's not on our side. But then, I only come across him on The Warroom.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
My take is not every conservative trusts Q. There has to be people out there who connect with other forms of Trump's base, and these idiots fill that void. We don't trust them because they don't trust the plan, but as long as they keep people from the other side then they're doing a good job. Remember a lot of conservatives have taken the jab, so that should be our biggest clue we don't all think alike.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
Many thought Stu Shiller (sp?) was a player, but I think he was just focused on winning his own battle and is not really vested in the war...perhaps he thinks he can be more effective after winning his battle...I think General Flynn lost a battle and became more effective in the war. Now regarding Poso, journalists can be harder to classify....he seemed pretty good from '16-20 what drives him now?
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
Thanks.lotsa things i had not seen.
This is like saying Steve Bannon is a black hat. I listen to both on the War Room and they certainly sound based. But, I thought Pence was based, too, so nothing surprises me. Guess I’ll watch and see on Poso…like everyone else. So, far I believe he is a Patriot.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
He was pushing that fake FB whistleblower story too...
Meh...