She read the approved application which I took to my boss the day it was published. I was told I was wrong and asked where I got my “printout”. I got on the FDA site and printed her a copy. That was almost 2 MONTHS ago. I can’t believe it’s taking so long for this to get out.most of the general public is still unaware.
I got to tell a couple last night that Iceland banned the Moderna, Japan found metal in it, and a self-assembling moving parasite was seen in one vial under microscope.
Oh brother. She already admitted she didn't know what she was talking about when she told you, YOUR were wrong and wanted to know where you got your info. Then suddenly, she can't talk about it. What a garbage human.
Agree, we are not yet “mandated,” but I am well prepared when they do it. We got the “bend over” warning by upper management to be prepared for it. They poked a hornet’s nest here with that.
I had this conversation with an army buddy only 2 days ago. When I tried to explain to him that the vaccine he was promoting was Not approved this was his response:
"you also have the right to refuse Comirnaty. It's the exact same product. The only thing that full FDA approval provides to Pfizer and BioNTech is the ability to advertise the vaccine under a trade name, which is Comirnaty. All packaging produced before the FDA approval will say Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and all packaging produced after approval will say Comirnaty. Again, same product, same technology, same guidance, and now, same approval. I'm the last person to trust only Facebook fack-checkers, but the claim that "Comirnaty" is different from "Pfizer Vaccine" is the gaslighting that will disrupt progress that has been made thus far."
I cut and pasted that, word for word. So, pretty much whatever the MSM tells him to believe is what he believes. I provided the FDA website and the exact quote, and that was his response.
Condolences on having such a stupid buddy. Well, Cindy just blew his 'it's the exact same product' theory out the window. It may be very close, but it's not the same. And who cares anyway, they're both garbage.
I don’t know how to “enter text” for the link. Your answer in in the tiny little footnote. “Legally distinct.” The legal part is the difference between EUA and FDA approved.
It’s in the tiny little footnote. It’s obviously meant to be overlooked. “Legally Distinct” is only mentioned in the little footnote. Ask a lawyer. I’m no lawyer but I looked at it enough to know the difference between EUA and FDA approved.
I’m fully aware the approved formula is not the one being distributed, which is obfuscated by MSM, but the assertion of this video is that neither of the formulas have been approved, which is false.
The legally distinct formula being distributed that Pfizer claims is effectively interchangeable with the approved jab is only authorized, not approved, but that doesn’t change the fact that the Comirnaty “vaccine” has received FDA approval — which is contrary to the assertion of this video.
She read the approved application which I took to my boss the day it was published. I was told I was wrong and asked where I got my “printout”. I got on the FDA site and printed her a copy. That was almost 2 MONTHS ago. I can’t believe it’s taking so long for this to get out.most of the general public is still unaware.
So what did she say when you gave her the printout from the FDA?
I say this to npcs all the time. My family are the branch covidians spergin out when NARRATIVE CRITICAL FAULT detected.
I got to tell a couple last night that Iceland banned the Moderna, Japan found metal in it, and a self-assembling moving parasite was seen in one vial under microscope.
They were not happy.
Beep...boop....
I was told not to talk to people about it. Unethical ho!
Oh brother. She already admitted she didn't know what she was talking about when she told you, YOUR were wrong and wanted to know where you got your info. Then suddenly, she can't talk about it. What a garbage human.
Truth. It’s like some big secret. It feels evil.
Might visit a lawyer and see if her attitude and behavior makes her criminally liable when things break open about this organized mass murder event.
She might be interested in learning about it after you find out.
Agree, we are not yet “mandated,” but I am well prepared when they do it. We got the “bend over” warning by upper management to be prepared for it. They poked a hornet’s nest here with that.
I had this conversation with an army buddy only 2 days ago. When I tried to explain to him that the vaccine he was promoting was Not approved this was his response:
"you also have the right to refuse Comirnaty. It's the exact same product. The only thing that full FDA approval provides to Pfizer and BioNTech is the ability to advertise the vaccine under a trade name, which is Comirnaty. All packaging produced before the FDA approval will say Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and all packaging produced after approval will say Comirnaty. Again, same product, same technology, same guidance, and now, same approval. I'm the last person to trust only Facebook fack-checkers, but the claim that "Comirnaty" is different from "Pfizer Vaccine" is the gaslighting that will disrupt progress that has been made thus far."
I cut and pasted that, word for word. So, pretty much whatever the MSM tells him to believe is what he believes. I provided the FDA website and the exact quote, and that was his response.
Read him the clause that states that each is legally distinct.
Yes...this is a CRTICAL difference.
Condolences on having such a stupid buddy. Well, Cindy just blew his 'it's the exact same product' theory out the window. It may be very close, but it's not the same. And who cares anyway, they're both garbage.
I need sauce to help me give it to my manager too. Do you have the CDC link showing that all three are not approved?
enter text
I don’t know how to “enter text” for the link. Your answer in in the tiny little footnote. “Legally distinct.” The legal part is the difference between EUA and FDA approved.
What am I missing? It’s listed under licensed vaccines:
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states
And has an FDA BLA Approval Letter:
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
(BLA/NDA explained: https://www.nuventra.com/resources/blog/regulatory-differences-between-an-nda-bla/)
What is it approved/licensed for?
It's approved for more testing, which won't be done until at least 2023.
BLA approval is market approval, not testing approval. It has received BLA approval. (See links provided)
When the "approval" first came out, I remember reading that it won't be available until 2024.
It’s in the tiny little footnote. It’s obviously meant to be overlooked. “Legally Distinct” is only mentioned in the little footnote. Ask a lawyer. I’m no lawyer but I looked at it enough to know the difference between EUA and FDA approved.
I’m fully aware the approved formula is not the one being distributed, which is obfuscated by MSM, but the assertion of this video is that neither of the formulas have been approved, which is false.
The legally distinct formula being distributed that Pfizer claims is effectively interchangeable with the approved jab is only authorized, not approved, but that doesn’t change the fact that the Comirnaty “vaccine” has received FDA approval — which is contrary to the assertion of this video.
It will be available after 2023 when the trials are completed, soooooo…