Read more about HEK293, and why Pfizer wanted to hide its use in creation of the jab.....spoiler alert, fetal line derived from live birth infanticide to obtain live kidneys.
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
To all those people who have donated their organs on the Driver licenses, this is the EXACT same procedure. Let me explain why.
For a organ donation to occur, the victim must be alive. Otherwise, the organ is of no use. How this actually works is insidious in its procedure. The patient is given drugs to paralyze them and not to deaden the pain.
In the article above, this point is not revealed regarding the cesarean section of the removed infant. It is most certainly paralyzed, but it feels every part of terrifying pain as it is being vivisected. This is actually required because the adrenochrome released is needed to preserve the organs removed.
The same procedure and release of adrenochrome is needed for any organ donor. You are alive and aware when you are being vivisected to donate your organs.
It is truly horrifying to know this and is a continuing house of horrors.
Wow. Can I get a source to spread?
Okay.... I'm not prepared to give a link, but as I write I'm always thinking I'm here to help. So I did a cursory search on organ harvesting and here is one link with Dr. Paul Byrne explaining it in horrifying detail. . There are many other sources as well.
You cannot make this shit up as to how evil this world actually is.
I was really hoping for like an nih link. I did find some but not related to HEK293. Still bad. But not vaccine related
Did you click on the link I provided? it's all there.
https://www.cbruk.org/what_the_hek
https://www.cbruk.org/dontforgetjohanna
https://www.catholicnews.com/commentary-what-the-hek/
That's what the Chinese do. They paralyze living people (usually prisoners) and take their organs out without anesthesia.
And they are more open about it because it is 'effective' political propaganda. Here not so.
How a society treats its animals now, will soon be how that society treats its people.
What is your source? My husband is asking proof
The problem with ‘sources’ and ‘proof’ is that people are free to accept or reject any source or proof, based on their own opinions.
Like my sister, who insists Joe Biden did NOT sexually assault Tara Reade, because if he had, then more women would have made the same allegation...
I pointed out to sister, that the boy she accused of raping her, has never been accused of rape by anyone else... so by her own logic, her alleged rape must not have occurred.
Which I know from experience to be false.