Thanks to the anon who reported from PA where Dr. Frank was. I posted in that thread, and it got me thinking some more.
I've been wondering how the hell a pillow guy could get a case before the US Supreme Court on election fraud.
I've been wondering how long it will take to work multiple cases through to the highest court.
I've been wondering how they will get around the court's claim of no standing.
But, now I understand.
Lindell will not be "taking his case to the Supreme Court." That is not what will happen. That is not his role.
Remember he was "handed" some information about election fraud, and then blew it all up for the world to see? Remember how that was the start of the big push and eyes on the Arizona audit?
Lindell's role is to gather evidence. He got the lady in Colorado. He got thousands of affidavits. His symposium brought like-minded patriots in the state legislatures -- all 50 states -- together to meet each other and start working on the plan.
Meanwhile ...
The Arizona audit was happening. That thing is not done, yet. Jovan Pulitzer still has yet to reveal his work on the the paper ballots, to prove they were all invalid due to using unauthorized paper.
Meanwhile, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and likely other states are all gathering evidence.
Meanwhile, state attorneys general are preparing to sue the states that committed fraud and violated their own laws in the election in order to cheat (especially Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania).
When the stage is set, certain states will sue other states over election fraud issues, and show evidence that they did not follow their own laws, which harmed the states suing by not providing for a valid election, thus fraudulently changing the results of the Electoral College.
When a state is a party to a lawsuit, the US Supreme Court has ORIGINAL jurisidiction. The case goes straight there. It does not pass Go. It does not collect $200. It does not stop off at lower courts first. Straight to SCOTUS.
This is a constituational mandate:
In all Cases ... in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. -- Article 3, Section 2
Once the states file their case in the US Supreme Court, Mike Lindell and others will file amicus curiae ("friend of the court") briefs. Remember in Flynn's case when that retarded judge stepped in to tell Sullivan he didn't have to follow the law? That was an amicus curiae.
But Lindell's entry into the case will be a boatload of evidence in support of the case. Lindell does not need to be a party. He is a non-party, but someone who has evidence that is relevant to the case. He could even be a witness. There will likely be other non-parties coming in, as well.
This will be an actual trial. That's what original jurisdiction means.
The evidence will be so overwhelming, that the court will have only two choices:
(1) SCOTUS takes the case, election fraud is proven in court, and the 2020 presidential election is declared fraudulent in certain states, which changes the Electoral College vote, which either puts Trump in or sends it to the House for a vote (where Republicans have the edge -- we will see about the RINO's), or
(2) SCOTUS claims no standing (again), in which case it becomes clear that the courts are not functioning and the federal government is no longer ensuring a "republican form of government" (i.e. rule of law) per the constituational requirement, and then the military has legal basis to declare that the civilian courts are not functioning, so they shut down the insurrection by the Chinese and American traitors that started back in 2020, and prove the election fraud in military court.
Almost like there was a plan or somethin' ...
I like this and I agree with the principal. Keep in mind Texas and 20+ states did this in December 2020 and the SCOTUS said they had no standing and refused to hear the case. If it goes to SCOTUS now they will just say it is too late.
I think the people that gave Mike the info were connected to military. The info needed to be spread far and wide to awaken the public. It's basically a way to present the evidence since courts refused to allow evidence to be presented by not taking up any cases.
Lindell is the perfect pitch man to spread the evidence.
I do think states need to decertify their electors. This is something the MSM cannot bury by not reporting.
In the end, I believe the military will handle this. Can't say we didn't try going through the SCOTUS.
I believe the 20 state case before the Supreme Court was on purpose to show us confirmation in practice of the fast route to the Supreme Court.
It can be no other way when a State sues another State. After all, this the very reason why the Supreme Court was created. And that 20 State lawsuit also shows how extraordinary it was for the Supreme Court to rule these States did not have standing. Who does then?
To this day, I am rattled to the core about this. It has destroyed any faith I have in the SCOTUS.
I acknowledge the military could have a role, and I hope it does happen, but depending on them to do the right thing is a foolish. It is only in the movies that the cavalry saves the day. We are on our own. Pray to our Lord for salvation and the ability to resist, to be strong and to fight for our lives and freedom.
Why do we need the Surpeme Court in this at all?
Shouldn't the state's L branch be able to decertify their electors?
Yes. If they had spine.
That’s it in a nut shell.
You could also say this about SCOTUS, who has already shown they are spineless.
If I remember correctly, Texas and some other states already went straight to the supreme court and were ruled with "no standing"
It will be different this time because Texas did not allege fraud. From Wikipedia:
This time, they have mountains of evidence of fraud. The states that committed fraud did not, as a matter of law, have a valid set of Electors in the Electoral College, which affected the election.
Fraud vitiates everything, as Sidney Powell reminded us from the Throckmorton case.
We'll see which way the wind blows with the black dress crowd.
Yup. The world seems to know. Or at least Italy and also America. AUS isn't left behind on knowing the theft that took place. I can't imagine how hard it is to sleep at night knowing how many countries you have to quell before you can feel like you "achieved victory"/
At least Haiti has the lowest casualty rate from covid. "experts" cant figure out why an unvaxxed population is winning the 'war on covid'. they are still scratching each others heads...
I love the thought of this being the way it goes. My one fear is that ACB has already let it be known her desire for the court NOT be involved in election cases, particularly due to the 2000 election. Maybe that was a deflection, and if she's truly a Constitutionalist, she and the court will take the case and show the world what really happened.
Didn’t the SC return a number of state led court cases regarding elections back to the states....
They effectively refused to hear such applications...... even Kavanaugh agreed... the only dissent was Thomas.....
We know what the SC is supposed to do ..... but the SC haven’t done what they are supposed to in years.....
It’s no different to the way the Constitution is being trampled on..... we know what they are obligated to do but they still never do it......!
I don’t think the SC is the way forward and there are a lot of obstacles that need to be removed from within the SC before we can expect such an outcome.....
WWG1WGA
Well, to be fair, the SC IS the way...just not in a traditional way. Their role IS to disavow the case. (by the book)
Only AFTER they refuse to hear the case does the "Laws of War" come fully into focus and into play. With the "by the book" process fully exhausted, only then can the military enter without any violations argued to prevent their entry.
It is Chess play in the highest dimensional way.
Now, standing in contrast, hypothetically, let's say this process does unfold this way BUT the military does NOT enter and NOTHING actually happens at all? What happens under that scenario? Is it then left solely up to us (Americans en masse"? If so, well, that would appear to play directly into the Cabal (DS) plan. In that, with such a mass citizen push back (taking things into our own hands), the Deep State or Cabal (Biden-eers) will (or could) then claim a true "insurection" IS taking place and lock us all down with Marshall Law. It is at this point that the entire country comes to a screeching halt and the precipice is directly at every American's doorstep and each of us MUST take a stand and make our own individual decision about who we are, what we are and IF we are going to allow it.
IMHO, regardless of the path this may take, we win.
I think you are correct. The USSC is not going to hear this case. But when they don't, that might be the missing piece for .mil intervention.
bruh the military aint gonna do shit they are cucked af lol
Definitely not (1).
What makes you think, after the 20 state lawsuit, that anything will be different in thinking, “ When the stage is set, certain states will sue other states over election fraud issues, and show evidence that they did not follow their own laws, which harmed the states suing by not providing for a valid election, thus fraudulently changing the results of the Electoral College.”
The supreme disappointment court.
there is not a snowballs chance that the commie AG in Michigan is going to sue her cohort (the SOS) will not happen the crooks cover for the crooks and I am sure it is the same in most cases
Pretty much same scenario in Colorado, guess what SOS isn’t allowing Tina Peters access to this current election? What are YOU hiding SOS Colorado? WE KNOW!