One theory making the rounds is that the Dems pulled off a Color Revolution on the country. Trump was supposed to directly challenge the cheating and Dems and the Media would collude to forcibly remove Trump from power. These scenarios were wargamed with the Transition Integrity Project. Trump would be blamed for failing in the plandemic and causing political instability that crashes the economy.
Out of the ashes, Dems would arrive with the Great Reset to fix all of these problems. The reset would essentially be the veneer of communism with a core of feudalism.
Trump's Operation Warp Speed threw the plandemic into a spin because the economy could no longer be shut down for years waiting for a vaccine.
By stepping aside, Trump avoids blame from the media. Dems have a majority in congress and the executive. It's their economy.
Meanwhile, the operations to blow up our economy (inflation, moving manufacturing away to China, killing our energy independence, deficit spending, etc) that have been going on for decades and simply cannot be stopped.
So essentially, Trump took away their cover for economic collapse and gave them a live grenade to hold.
It sounds like the Dems are attempting to double down on everything by spending as much money as they can and banking that government programs never actually end, forcing even more deficit spending that we cannot afford. They know that the people don't approve of all that they are doing and expect to be thrown out of office.
They just need to delay the collapse until they don't have power. 2 years gets Congress off their hands and Biden can say Congress failing to bow to his will is to blame. Not the best victory for this plan but it's a story that can be spun.
As the most viable Republican candidate, the Dems really hope to kick the can down the road and turn it over to Trump (or anyone, really. But taking out Trump would be sweet revenge) so that the economy blows up under the opposition's total control.
Makes a lot of sense, thanks - still I have a hard time imagining them thinking/speaking this way, dumb as they are! I am putting my bets on intentional troll, assuming this is real.
Of course it would be MOST helpful to know who Eric Levitz, Ronald Klain, Aaron Blake, and Dr. Benjamin Braddock are. I have no clue. A higher energy level post would identify all these people.
He retweeted Eric Levitz's (original) tweet. It is somewhat confusing, but the lefty reporter is complaining that the Byden bill wasn't accepted and being replaced by a "grab bag" that will expire "in Trump's second term." The WH Chief of Staff retweeting it would be implying that that would be correct. Aaron Blake, also lefty reporting saying retweets "aren't supposed to be endorsements but..." implies that he agrees. Take it for what it is worth.
It is encouraging, on a certain small level, that the media is on the train of thought of a second Trump term. However, no body here wants a 2024 run, we want him back on Jan 20 2020.
It could also all be on purpose/controlled to plant the seeds.
Um... well... YEAH! Context is always important. To most readers, these are just random names, like Joey Bagadonuts and Joe Schmoe. Chasing down four different names to suss out a post is asking too much of most readers. So who are they?
The point is this is a research board that has become a social media website. People bitch about not being spoon fed because they aren't familiar with the info being shared. That means it's time to open up another tab and search for the relevant context. Then you get to call op a faggot for being full of shit or reinforce their post with more data. If that's too much work for 'most readers' then they need to hit the bricks or stick to lurking.
By my count there are about 5 or 6 new posts every minute. On way to keep up with the more interesting ones is to check the RISING tab, but I prefer to see what's new. No one has the kind of time you're talking about to chase all the half assed postings on GAW. I do have a life outside GAW, as astonishingly as that may seem.
If I post something, I try to include all pertinent information to prevent that kind of digging by the readers. It's common courtesy, and common clear writing.
Posts that are made in an information vacuum are just low energy posts that don't take the readers into account.
Isn't the "Earned Income Credit," aka the "child tax credit" already permanent? I've been receiving that for right around 23 yrs. I have 5 kids, oldest is 25, youngest is 10. If 20+ yrs of a fed give program is temporary, then what do [they] consider permanent?
More proof that the Biden administration is suffering from a severe lack of morale lmao
Kamala and Jill want each other gone, Joe is living in fantasy land, and now they're all but accepting a Trump landslide in the next election, if they make it that far
I would like more context on this
Me too👍
Yeah, b cause it would seem that the WH staff knows more about the viability of the Buyden Admin than Buyden or his wife.
One theory making the rounds is that the Dems pulled off a Color Revolution on the country. Trump was supposed to directly challenge the cheating and Dems and the Media would collude to forcibly remove Trump from power. These scenarios were wargamed with the Transition Integrity Project. Trump would be blamed for failing in the plandemic and causing political instability that crashes the economy.
Out of the ashes, Dems would arrive with the Great Reset to fix all of these problems. The reset would essentially be the veneer of communism with a core of feudalism.
Trump's Operation Warp Speed threw the plandemic into a spin because the economy could no longer be shut down for years waiting for a vaccine.
By stepping aside, Trump avoids blame from the media. Dems have a majority in congress and the executive. It's their economy.
Meanwhile, the operations to blow up our economy (inflation, moving manufacturing away to China, killing our energy independence, deficit spending, etc) that have been going on for decades and simply cannot be stopped.
So essentially, Trump took away their cover for economic collapse and gave them a live grenade to hold.
It sounds like the Dems are attempting to double down on everything by spending as much money as they can and banking that government programs never actually end, forcing even more deficit spending that we cannot afford. They know that the people don't approve of all that they are doing and expect to be thrown out of office.
They just need to delay the collapse until they don't have power. 2 years gets Congress off their hands and Biden can say Congress failing to bow to his will is to blame. Not the best victory for this plan but it's a story that can be spun.
As the most viable Republican candidate, the Dems really hope to kick the can down the road and turn it over to Trump (or anyone, really. But taking out Trump would be sweet revenge) so that the economy blows up under the opposition's total control.
When will the music stop? Nobody really knows.
Would seem they know that Trump is getting reelected in 2024 and anticipate every program running itself dry under him.
Makes a lot of sense, thanks - still I have a hard time imagining them thinking/speaking this way, dumb as they are! I am putting my bets on intentional troll, assuming this is real.
Most of that adds up.
Of course it would be MOST helpful to know who Eric Levitz, Ronald Klain, Aaron Blake, and Dr. Benjamin Braddock are. I have no clue. A higher energy level post would identify all these people.
Ronald Klain - WH Chief of Staff
Eric Levitz - New York-based journalist and contributor for the New York Magazine
Aaron Blake - Senior Political Reporter for Washington Post
Dr. Benjamin Braddock - Outspoken Dr or (Dr.?) opposing coof vax
THANK YOU!!
So none of the tweets are from whitehouse anything. And it still gets 200+ upvotes.
Ronald Klain - White House Chief of Staff
Ah. I don’t use Twatter and only noticed the 3 tweets. I see Klain now. This be a case where highlighting would actually help rather than detract
He retweeted Eric Levitz's (original) tweet. It is somewhat confusing, but the lefty reporter is complaining that the Byden bill wasn't accepted and being replaced by a "grab bag" that will expire "in Trump's second term." The WH Chief of Staff retweeting it would be implying that that would be correct. Aaron Blake, also lefty reporting saying retweets "aren't supposed to be endorsements but..." implies that he agrees. Take it for what it is worth.
Basically.
It is encouraging, on a certain small level, that the media is on the train of thought of a second Trump term. However, no body here wants a 2024 run, we want him back on Jan 20 2020.
It could also all be on purpose/controlled to plant the seeds.
Um... well... YEAH! Context is always important. To most readers, these are just random names, like Joey Bagadonuts and Joe Schmoe. Chasing down four different names to suss out a post is asking too much of most readers. So who are they?
The point is this is a research board that has become a social media website. People bitch about not being spoon fed because they aren't familiar with the info being shared. That means it's time to open up another tab and search for the relevant context. Then you get to call op a faggot for being full of shit or reinforce their post with more data. If that's too much work for 'most readers' then they need to hit the bricks or stick to lurking.
By my count there are about 5 or 6 new posts every minute. On way to keep up with the more interesting ones is to check the RISING tab, but I prefer to see what's new. No one has the kind of time you're talking about to chase all the half assed postings on GAW. I do have a life outside GAW, as astonishingly as that may seem.
If I post something, I try to include all pertinent information to prevent that kind of digging by the readers. It's common courtesy, and common clear writing.
Posts that are made in an information vacuum are just low energy posts that don't take the readers into account.
they prefer to be told what to do, given money for nothing and take vaccines.
Isn't the "Earned Income Credit," aka the "child tax credit" already permanent? I've been receiving that for right around 23 yrs. I have 5 kids, oldest is 25, youngest is 10. If 20+ yrs of a fed give program is temporary, then what do [they] consider permanent?
EIC has to have a qualifying dependent, who may or not be an actual child. The two (EIC + CTC) work in conjunction the majority of the time, however.
Oh hey! Let’s all get overly excited, and miss the point of it being hypothetical!
Both Eric Levitz and Aaron Blake are journalist. Ronald Klain is the whitehouse chief of staff to help put this in context.
More proof that the Biden administration is suffering from a severe lack of morale lmao
Kamala and Jill want each other gone, Joe is living in fantasy land, and now they're all but accepting a Trump landslide in the next election, if they make it that far
Bullish af
That it will self-destruct during the 2nd Trump Administration to make Trump look bad.
ya looks to me like trolling to manufacture consent.