So far I've literally only read win after win. Deep in my unconscious there's an emergent respect for and trust in courts and judges and laws.
Yeah fucking RIGHT right? Gettin played i think
Comments (29)
sorted by:
It does not seem real to me. How can a prosecutor be such a dumbass? I mean, they are, but my God,...
I think they are going for a mistrial
I sat on a jury that had a lawyer very similar to this guy. Smug, snarky and comes off with the attitude that if you can't see what he does, you must be stupid.
Leads me to believe the cases he won before this must have been slam dunks.
I know, I keep thinking this is absolutely unreal. The names of the perps alone make me suspicious. I mean come on Rosenbaum and freaking HUBER!! These could be lawyers at the dept of injustice for pete's sake. The judge's phone going off during the trial with the ring tone of God Bless America. That's what really made me think, is this real? Did this really happen?
Lol grosskreutz and rosenbaum why not like shekelgrabber and bagelberger
Same
Always on our toes, good form
This trial has to be part of of the show. It shows the people just how corrupt our justice system has become. Leads to the public accepting military tribunals to try the criminals.
It could be! But i think a healthy dose of skepticism and paranoia will help us in the long run
I mean, it’s on TV. So there’s that.
Is it? I haven't had tv since the Obama cable box mandate like 13 years ago
PMs w titties are cool tho
They left the door open for the jury to consider that Rittenhouse provoked the encounter and forfeited his right to self defense... On a video and still image that the prosecutor says show Rittenhouse pointing his rifle at someone; but no one but the prosecutors are able to discern that from the tiny blob on the screen despite watching it over and over again. It's a pure fabrication.
This is where they are going to railroad him to placate the mob. The judge should never have allowed this argument to be presented to the jury. It is absurd on it's face to admit evidence that the jury needs to be told what to look for and how it should be interpreted. The video should stand on it's own and should be unequivocal in what it depicts.
They will convict him by saying that he provoked the attacks because they don't want their city to burn.
I dunno I imagine most love the thought of state sanctioned Kyle militia kids vs the mobs
Rittenhouse is a psyop,
like Tsarnaev at Supreme Court
The Boston Marathon Bombing was pre-planned mass casualty drill,
done by the DHS, under the Urban Shield program.
FEMA deputy admin Richard Serino was the "incident commander"
https://archive.md/0Qn39
This after action report clearly says it was a planned exercise.
Good luck with your mental retardation
https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2016/09/uz/after-action-report-for-the-response-to-the-2013-boston-marathon-bombings.pdf
Ok retard
Enjoy the mother fucking show for a change
I am incapable of joy in any political context
Feels like a set up. How do you make an image depicting whites as violent racists? How do you paint a picture of PoCs as victims of white hate?
You set them up
Exactly, tell that to the 75% of normies out there that think KR was wearing a KKK hood lynching black people
'We give you one, so we'll take two'...
It is speculated that the prosecutor was trying to get a mistrial without prejudice, so that he can retry the case. He would have advantage of getting a new judge, but also would know the defenses strategy.