If we are trying to show these people because you can't tell them, naturally the stories that come out each day have to build the displeasure. If patriots are in control, why couldn't it be that perhaps many of these heartbreaking news stories are pure fabrication, all designed to turn the lefts base against them? General Flynn has told us many times, this is a information war. We are using disinformation to destroy the communists. Instead of slowly feeding us the communist plan so nobody notices, they are cramming it down our throats so we choke on it.
I mean for God's sake, does the Biden admin really think the policies he is pushing is doing the democrats any favors? It looks as though he is intentionally trying to destroy the country and nobody from his party is telling him to stop or slowdown, you are making us look bad. His policies are destroying their chances in the upcoming elections and his party refuses to say you have gone to far? Would any political party be so stupid knowing they are setting up a scenario where they cant walk down the street? How will they hold campaign rallies? They will be heckled off the stage. Biden is ensuring a landslide when for the MAGA people, who is the man behind the mask?
Where are the pictures of the caravans on our border? Why would Trump build an entire border wall and leave a couple small sections unfinished? So he could create the narrative. Where are the parents and families of these dying athletes? How do we know there is a oil shortage? Why couldn't they just raise prices to piss people off? Mandate keeps getting pushed back and ruled unconstitutional. Trump pushing vaccines? Vote fraud is exposed and nothing is done about it, at least not yet.
Think back on the stories that pissed you off the most. Do we see them playing out in your hometown? Why couldn't these stories be white hat generated to get the outcome they desired all along? Total decimation of the Democrat party.
If devolution is real, we have combatant commanders strategically placed across the country to shut down uprisings, keep things functioning, make sure no harm comes to the people.
We were told to enjoy the show. Do you think Q would have told us to enjoy the REAL destruction of our country or something that appeared to be destroying our country. Q said it was a movie, to me that means its not real. If Trump is still in charge and we are watching a movie, maybe a lot of the fictional stories we get each day serve a couple purposes, gaslighting the public, motivating them to fight as we watch the democrats go down in flames. Yes we have enemies out there and some of these stories could be true but if they think they can push a communist agenda on the American people and we are going to just accept it, they have to be the dumbest people on the planet.
I guess what I am saying, dont get your panties in a bunch, our country is fine and we will continue living on as a free people for many years to come. These bitches are going down, hard.
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
PS: Im on mobile, please excuse any typos.
It's weird how many conservatives chant "Fake news! Fake news!" while also pointing at Hollywood films, the History Channel and Wikipedia pages about WW2 while chanting, "100% true! 100% true!", as if fake news didn't exist before 2000.
The Apollo Mission is the rare media hoax that has a mostly positive, uplifting aura about it. That is why people are so quick to react in anger and reject the abundant evidence that the moon landings were faked.
Decades of TV and movies set in outer space have blinded people to the sad reality that our technology is insufficient to send us safely more than a few hundred miles off the surface of the earth.
I've researched this and I'm not so sure.
I think the CIA did hoax the moon landing as a backup in case the real mission failed, but I'm not convinced the real mission failed especially given how most of the world's observatories were tracking and listening to the mission in real time.
It is absurd on the face of it to believe that men could travel nearly 500,000 miles to the moon and back on a single tank of fuel from 1968 to 1972 but that in the forty-nine years since then, we have not ventured further than four hundred miles off the planet. We are stuck in low earth orbit because we always have been. It was easier to fool the world in the low-tech era of 1972.
Believing in Apollo is like thinking it logical for the auto industry to peak with something like the 1972 Dodge Dart but then decide ever after to revert to making only cars more along the line of the 1912 Ford Model T because we just don't have the oomph to make cars as sophisticated as the 1972 Dodge Dart with today's technology.
They weren't burning propellant all the way there.
No. It's not absurd. In the vacuum of space, inertia will carry you the entire way. All you need is enough fuel to force your way through the Earth's thick atmosphere and gravity well and enough fuel to slow down a little on the way back while taking advantage of gravity.
The Space Shuttle doesn't "slow down" when it approaches the moon but it maintains it's speed while launching a tiny lander. Most of that intertia is then used for the trip home. This is why the Shuttle only needs huge fuel tanks that are dumped back to Earth almost the moment it reaches escape velocity.
The rockets don't burn any fuel for 99.99% of the trip because Star Wars is fiction.
Dude, the last Shuttle mission was in 2011.
In the late 1950s, no less an expert than Werner von Braun declared that a rocket to the moon would have to be the size of the Empire State Building to contain enough fuel for the journey. The moon mission was a Cold War propaganda stunt.
We can't replicate it because we no longer receive our news from black and white newspapers and third generation black and white video broadcast over the air to an orthicon tube.
Ah, good ole Ernie Kovacs...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4O5RXzA1s0
As Percy Dovetonsils might say, "I'm thimply pleathed thomeone caught the referenthe."
We conducted our first nuclear bomb tests in 1945 and accidentally launched a manhole cover into space with escape velocity. That disk of metal had no engine and no fuel and would have landed on the moon if we aimed it.
I appreciate your open-mindedness, however it's baseless because we launch satellites into orbit on an almost daily basis and the technology to reach escape velocity is identical but with just a little more thrust.
How many people are passengers on those satellites and how many of those satellites go to the moon and back?
I think "landing on the moon" is a question of vehicles.
Did we get there via the Apollo missions? No
Did we get there (secretly) via anti-gravity crafts? Yes
If we went to the moon it wasn’t in the Apollo garbage. I have no doubt we have classified tech beyond belief, so going doesn’t seem that strange to me. The real question is what did they find there that would prompt NASA to lie about losing technology for the next 50 years?
Updoot because I pretty much agree with you
Fake news works both ways.
A perfect example, when Trump talks about the border, he says they are letting millions of people in to our country, it is a total disaster and then he always says... "we are not going to let it happen, we are not going to let it happen", because.....it isn't happening. Its information warfare.
100% agree with you.
I've said it before. If there is AI on the bad guys side, why can't there be AI on our side feeding us noise. Not every conservative knows about what we know about. It's plausible that they are trying to fool both sides so then the curtain is draw back we all fee like we were duped and come together more.
At this point I question everything, even my own ideas about what could be the truth.
All suggested information represents disinformation; because nature doesn't communicate information; but inspiration instead. Nature does not suggest "I am"; it moves everything in it as inspiration for our senses to react to by choice, which represents adaptation of form (life) to flow (inception towards death).
Others suggest information to deceive one to ignore inspiration; because that allows them to control the meaning of the suggested for all those who consent to it by choice.
Suggested information asks choice to want or not want it; while perceived inspiration demands needed adaptation. Choice of want represents ignorance of need, and suggestion of want vs not want (conflict of reason) therefore corrupts understanding of those who choose want over need.
From a different perspective...nature represents the natural order (flow) for the resistance within (form); others deceive us to follow their suggested orders instead.
Choice represents response to balance (need/want); not to the suggested choices by others (want vs not want).
Nature offers sound to the senses of all within; those within respond by choice to shape words out of perceived sound; which they then suggested as idolized meaning towards the choice of others. This is called spell-craft. Languages do not represent communication; resonance by choice to balance does.
What they call disinformation is keeping the balance. fire up the meme cannons.
I do not believe the media is over-hyping the dangers of the vaccine.