Here is the letter:
Twitter https://twitter.com/jack/status/1465347002426867720
Here is another source for the anti-Twitter folks. https://nypressnews.com/news/finance/banking/read-the-letter-jack-dorsey-sent-to-twitter-employees-announcing-his-resignation-as-ceo/
If you look at the top of the page you see a 9:45 timestamp and then at the bottom of the letter he says we will have a meeting tomorrow at 9:05 to discuss it all.
Q post 945 https://qanon.pub/#945
BOOOOOM!
Q post 905 https://qanon.pub/#905
Twatter in receivership in 24 days?
Shut em down!
24hrs to respond.
He did, smartly.
Public view.
Q
Kek, who the eff sets a meeting for precisely 9:05
Nice find fren.
Tbh it would be pretty easy for the DS to do something like his on purpose to mess with us, just send the thing at the time of a "BOOOM" post, then mention another time stamp of a twatter related post.
But I'll take it.
Right, even it it was true, most people would just say 9:00
It's big tech. Nobody turns up on time.
If the company uses Outlook, they get 15min reminders of calendar events, including meetings.
Im sure your comment was a joke, but I think this fact gives further weight to the time being a Q post.
That's actually worth a dig for curious reasons. Going to ask some folks I knew that worked at Twitter.
EDIT:They use an in-house system that is custom built. Regularly there is a 5 minute delay for Video Conferencing to Sync up with buffering and encryption:
Ultimately they did revert to Google Hangouts:
This removed the 5 min VC Bottleneck:
Thus we are beholden to a timeline of the 5 mins layerover indeed being something that did happen regularly in the past due to VC Startup and that no longer is in effect. A 5 minute lapse is indeed more suspect than not since 2015.
src1: https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/a/2015/improving-communication-across-distributed-teams src2: http://techcrunch.com/2015/07/09/an-interview-with-alex-roetter-twitters-head-of-engineering/