First, this isn't a Study, it's a pre-print submitted to their portal. Second, open the actual study and it has a huge error, it says CDC uses VAERS to determine the numbers of death from the vaccine, that's not true. The CDC uses VAERS as an "Early warning system" so if they see a ton of certain types of side effects popping up, they dig in and determine what is going on. They don't actually use VAERS to compile any sort of real data.
For the win. Anon needs to be up at the top of this thread. I've been bitching about that very thing since this started. VAERS IS NOT ... IS NOT a scorecard. IT IS exactly what you said ... an 'early warning system'. More than that, with respect to FAUXVID ... it's been a counter to the bullshit narrative 'Vaccines are safe'. No ... No the fuck they are not.
People are waking up because of it. Robert Kennedy Jr. book is #2 best seller ... AFTER they RAN OUT OF FUCKING PRINT BOOKS on the 3d day. That happened, because I contact the CDF about it and that is what they told me. I thought it was suppression. They said "nope ... we were short sighted on how popular it would be. We ran out of print copies on day two. The printers are working 24/7 to get more hardcopies out by Christmas".
There was a post here about a year ago that was telling people to flood VAERS with BS reports so people would "see the truth," after that the CDC started ignoring the system and focusing on their own testing.
Yes. Zelenko theorized some time back that death would be maybe 10 times more likely be reported than say a rash, so his guess was around 10%. This paper claiming 5% is in the right ballpark.
Did anyone ever stop and think about Dr. Malone. He claims to have had a covid shot but, we’re all under the consensus it’s not safe at any age and not happening for most of us. He also seems slightly boastful about his creation of the technology. Has anyone thought, he might be benefiting from all of this, perhaps royalties from the use of his technology?
First, this isn't a Study, it's a pre-print submitted to their portal. Second, open the actual study and it has a huge error, it says CDC uses VAERS to determine the numbers of death from the vaccine, that's not true. The CDC uses VAERS as an "Early warning system" so if they see a ton of certain types of side effects popping up, they dig in and determine what is going on. They don't actually use VAERS to compile any sort of real data.
For the win. Anon needs to be up at the top of this thread. I've been bitching about that very thing since this started. VAERS IS NOT ... IS NOT a scorecard. IT IS exactly what you said ... an 'early warning system'. More than that, with respect to FAUXVID ... it's been a counter to the bullshit narrative 'Vaccines are safe'. No ... No the fuck they are not.
People are waking up because of it. Robert Kennedy Jr. book is #2 best seller ... AFTER they RAN OUT OF FUCKING PRINT BOOKS on the 3d day. That happened, because I contact the CDF about it and that is what they told me. I thought it was suppression. They said "nope ... we were short sighted on how popular it would be. We ran out of print copies on day two. The printers are working 24/7 to get more hardcopies out by Christmas".
The problem is VAERS is the ONLY system tracking side effects bc it’s not being tracked.
In the US. There are several others around the world.
"Early warning system" that's completely ignored by the people that are supposed to be paying attention to it.
It's hard when it's politicized and corrupted.
There was a post here about a year ago that was telling people to flood VAERS with BS reports so people would "see the truth," after that the CDC started ignoring the system and focusing on their own testing.
That might be their official narrative, but it looks more like they simply ignore VAERS.
Which they probably should, anyone can add reports there and they've found single IPs that enter hundreds of reports.
This is the abstract of the study. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk
Truth will out.
Well, VAERS does admit that their numbers typically only account for 1% of the real adverse reactions.
But the vaccine is safe and effective, folks! Dr Fauci says so!
That 1% number was from a study by Harvard several years ago trying to figure out what percentage of problems actually made it into VAERS.
Sounds like a credible number then.
Yes. Zelenko theorized some time back that death would be maybe 10 times more likely be reported than say a rash, so his guess was around 10%. This paper claiming 5% is in the right ballpark.
Ok, cut all future NIH funding to Columbia University until they retract this outrageous paper! 🤪
Meanwhile the shills keep saying anyone can report so it's vastly overestimating the deaths.
Did anyone ever stop and think about Dr. Malone. He claims to have had a covid shot but, we’re all under the consensus it’s not safe at any age and not happening for most of us. He also seems slightly boastful about his creation of the technology. Has anyone thought, he might be benefiting from all of this, perhaps royalties from the use of his technology?
Where are these bomb shells exploding? The lights are not on.