What if they were vetted by the Q team, and put in place. Now the white hats are completely pulling their strings to control 'devolution'. You'll notice that they go liberal on everything pushing us closer to 'the precipice' ..... EXCEPT 2A.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
This movie is starting to suck. 😭😭😭😭😭
Indeed.
Seriously this feels like some scene where a kid is caught smoking by their parents and they make them smoke them all until they get sick to teach them a lesson...and we're their siblings who for some reason are being forced to stay in the room and hot box with them until they finish an entire carton.
Exactly!! We're being punished for their misdeeds.
We should never forget our lesson after that, for sure.
Correct. I believe Barrett and Kavanagh are the nuclear weapons for the grand finale of this Devolution. Until then they have to ensure they don't blow their cover. They will not vote for anything that would blow the devolution prematurely, like vaccines or election fraud etc.
Good luck
This movie is starting to suck. 😭😭😭😭😭
Only problem is, there has to be a failure of all three branches of the gov't.
Yes devolution. You can't give any wins that will help the Dems and Rinos hide.
Art of War says.. thats incorrect sir.
I gues you are referring to - Art of War - Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak. Devolution - making the enemy appear strong
Jessir
Let you enemy get comfortable and lazy and overly confident, then strike hard.
I think you're oversimplifying a very complex topic.
Corruption is defined as "the abuse of entrusted power for private gain".
I'm not sure I buy the theory of this post, but let's say it's true. Do you think the white hats would be doing it to enrich their bank books or their power like black hats?
Again, I don't subscribe to the above theory myself, but there is also a question of which side is breaking the law. Trump was very clear that his side is the part of "law and order". Q posts and the whole white hat strategy went to great lengths to follow the law.
Getting the sealed indictments without letting the enemy know what was going on required a LOT of misinformation and misdirection. It would have been easier just to slash and burn like black hats, but the white hats have been very clear about following the law.
I don't think they'd break that now. It'd be a waste of prior effort.
You're saying that a law (as written) is illegal if it affects the well being of citizens. That is a subjective argument. The bigger question for people in the US is if the law fits within the framework of the constitution. Is it constitutional?
Government surveillance is legal if you go through the proper procedures. The Obama administration skipped that step and then used fake evidence to get FISA warrants to cover up years of illegal surveillance used to gather dirt on political opponents. (Personal enrichment and private gain = corruption).
Does government surveillance negatively affect the well being of the citizens? Depends on how it is used and who it is used on and why it is used. It's not a cut and dry matter.
As for "How could that not be considered corruption?" See the definition of corruption. Do you think it's for private gain and personal enrichment? If not, then no. It would more of a question of ethics.
It is illegal to use a legal name.
"The Law
The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!
If this is true, it is a serious fact, and moral duty requires me to call the attention of my fellow-citizens to it."
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. It's a pure rant without nuance. All laws are weapons for every kind of greed? That's not true. Some laws are used for abuse, but it's not the "laws", it's the people. You can have the best written laws on the books, but if they aren't enforce they're meaningless. Same is true of badly written laws.
The perversion is how democratic states and cities choose to enforce one law to hurt the citizens, but not another.
The law is not the problem. You've got the wrong target. What's do you do when a leftist mayor in Seattle refuses to enforce laws against looting? That's not a problem of the "law". That's a problem of enforcement.
Choose your target. Think logically.
Also "if this is true". If what is true? Do you mean the post above? It's only a theory. I wouldn't waste emotional energy getting upset over hypotheticals. That's like saying, "I hypothetically had my wallet stolen by my friend and I hate them for that." For... what? Are you sure they did it or are you only speculating?
Lol, read some Bastiat dude..
I believe they are being threatened or taking bribes by Chief Roberts.
Exactly like in the BBC's Utopia.
Fuck that. The SCOTUS should only be making rulings based on the constitution, and nothing else.
keep reaching for far out theories...
Don't they both have children? Family oriented? Doesn't take much to blackmail them and get them under control. I think black hats threatened their kids.
that makes 0 sense
Is this why they're still pushing to pack the court? Do they sense something going on and want to get in front of it?