Don't see why you got a dislike, its 100% the truth. Why promote a vaccine when people are getting conditions, infertility and dying from it. Makes no sense.
You missed option #3: Trump knows fully well that these vaccines are harmful, but can see far in advance of the consequences of condemning the vaccines and having the anti vax stance being weaponized by the mainstream media while half the country is still brainwashed. And so Trump made the best long term choice that we won't understand until the time comes
This is a type of strawman argument because it ignores the option to say NOTHING. If he did not recommend one way or the other, he would not be seen as anti vax. However he recommended to his rally goers at EVERY RALLY to take the clot shot.
You really think a reality exists in which Trump would have been able to completely avoid giving a stance on the vaccines this entire time?
By straight up ignoring the issue, or deflecting the question, even when asked directly, would cause a reaction as well.
Think back to when Trump was repeatedly badgered by the media who claimed he refused to denounce the White supremacists in Charlottesville.
The whole "very fine people" hoax that was generated out of sheer spite for Trump, solely because the opportunity to do so was there.
If Trump didn't publicly show support for the vaccines, such another opportunity to weaponize his not taking a clear definitive stance would manifest.
Whatever the case, either A) Trump made a calculated decision based on knowledge we are not privy to and understands game theory very well. Or B) Trump is controlled opposition and has been secretly in league with the cabal players this whole time and was only feigning to be their opposition.
Those are the only two options I really see available.
If he did not recommend one way or the other, he would not be seen as anti vax.
I don't believe that is true. Anything other than coming out in favor would be interpreted as he is really anti-vaxx due to "his movement being anti-vaxxers".
Saying nothing or trying to take the middle ground is basically the same as being anti-vaxx. At least in the hyper polarized MSM. And at least when it comes to Trump, their favorite person to polarize with.
What does promoting the shots and your rights at the same time do (which is exactly what he does, always in the same breath)? It takes all the wind out of the sails of the vaxxwashed, while at the same time putting the focus where it belongs, on us understanding the violation of our inalienable rights.
People who think that "people dying" from the vaccine is the worst thing that can happen are not paying attention (or are ignorant of) the evidence of what our reality is. We live in The Matrix. We have been programmed to believe that we are not free; that we are not sovereign; that we do not have the capacity to do our own critical thinking. We must go through a deprogramming. How is that accomplished?
Sometimes you can't TELL the public the truth.
YOU MUST SHOW THEM.
ONLY THEN WILL PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE.
Show them. Let them see the blatant violation of their rights. Not just us, who refuse the vaxx, but those that are completely ignorant to the veil that covers their eyes. How many people will really be harmed by him promoting the shot at this point? How many have held out this long, but his booster promotion is going to put people over the edge?
I assert not many. If there are a few, every single one of them is voluntary. If people are still so brainwashed as to assign over their critical thinking to Trump (or anyone else) then they have yet to learn the most important lesson in this war. If they die due to voluntary stupidity, such is the cost of freedom.
Who would have blamed Trump if he said "Listen, we made these vaccines and the people who are getting them are the most vulnerable people - 99% of people over 60 are vaccinated. That's great. And anyone else who wants to, they can get it too, and that's great. But no one should be forced to, or coerced. That's wrong."
That's a "no one disliked that" statement. Well, mostly no one.
No one except the deep state. And hence the media. And hence the sheep. And hence even the "no one disliked that" statement would be about just as weaponizeable as an anti-vaxx statement. Regardless, it would create a huge uproar and a big debate about what Trump really believes when much of the MAGA movement is anti-vaxx.
It would get the focus back on Trump. It would allow the media to re-inflame the ol' "Orange man bad" brainwashing trigger. Exactly what needs to be avoided if we are supposed to get out of this crazy situation that is MUCH worse than just the mega pressured, yet still voluntary choice of whether or not to take the vaccines:
We have mandates, qr code tyranny control system, full deep state take over of the whole world with total control of everyone.
Surely that is way more serious a threat than one more old man saying "take the vaccines" a couple of times when most who listen to him know not to listen to him about that.
The mainstream media has always been an issue. They are literally the main reason for all the division in this country and why the leftists hate our guts and think we deserve to be put in gulag.
Their entire reality is formulated around false information they believe and revere as truth.
I'm leaning your way. The only other reasonable explanation is, Trump rarely says anything at face value. It's never meant to mean what he says. Speaking in codes quite often.
That's just another scenario. I'm not saying I'm buying that scenario myself, but it is one.
my best guess is depopulation had to happen either way and all world leaders and orgs are in on it. It is probably a powerstruggle of who gets to be in charge when the dust settles. Make more white babies because 'They' are trying to end us.
Because he's playing 5D chess. He also know that the people who like him are the sort of people who think for themselves. Very very few would jump off a cliff if he says to while to opposite is true of the feeble minded followers MSM
"No doomers or shills: If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding."
Insinuating Trump is a blackhat without proof to back it up is shillspeak.
Don't see why you got a dislike, its 100% the truth. Why promote a vaccine when people are getting conditions, infertility and dying from it. Makes no sense.
You missed option #3: Trump knows fully well that these vaccines are harmful, but can see far in advance of the consequences of condemning the vaccines and having the anti vax stance being weaponized by the mainstream media while half the country is still brainwashed. And so Trump made the best long term choice that we won't understand until the time comes
This is a type of strawman argument because it ignores the option to say NOTHING. If he did not recommend one way or the other, he would not be seen as anti vax. However he recommended to his rally goers at EVERY RALLY to take the clot shot.
You really think a reality exists in which Trump would have been able to completely avoid giving a stance on the vaccines this entire time?
By straight up ignoring the issue, or deflecting the question, even when asked directly, would cause a reaction as well.
Think back to when Trump was repeatedly badgered by the media who claimed he refused to denounce the White supremacists in Charlottesville.
The whole "very fine people" hoax that was generated out of sheer spite for Trump, solely because the opportunity to do so was there.
If Trump didn't publicly show support for the vaccines, such another opportunity to weaponize his not taking a clear definitive stance would manifest.
Whatever the case, either A) Trump made a calculated decision based on knowledge we are not privy to and understands game theory very well. Or B) Trump is controlled opposition and has been secretly in league with the cabal players this whole time and was only feigning to be their opposition.
Those are the only two options I really see available.
I don't believe that is true. Anything other than coming out in favor would be interpreted as he is really anti-vaxx due to "his movement being anti-vaxxers".
Saying nothing or trying to take the middle ground is basically the same as being anti-vaxx. At least in the hyper polarized MSM. And at least when it comes to Trump, their favorite person to polarize with.
Not saying anything equals anti vax. Whether true, or just in the eyes of the left and the media.
True!
"Learn to play THE GAME. Q"
What does promoting the shots and your rights at the same time do (which is exactly what he does, always in the same breath)? It takes all the wind out of the sails of the vaxxwashed, while at the same time putting the focus where it belongs, on us understanding the violation of our inalienable rights.
People who think that "people dying" from the vaccine is the worst thing that can happen are not paying attention (or are ignorant of) the evidence of what our reality is. We live in The Matrix. We have been programmed to believe that we are not free; that we are not sovereign; that we do not have the capacity to do our own critical thinking. We must go through a deprogramming. How is that accomplished?
Show them. Let them see the blatant violation of their rights. Not just us, who refuse the vaxx, but those that are completely ignorant to the veil that covers their eyes. How many people will really be harmed by him promoting the shot at this point? How many have held out this long, but his booster promotion is going to put people over the edge?
I assert not many. If there are a few, every single one of them is voluntary. If people are still so brainwashed as to assign over their critical thinking to Trump (or anyone else) then they have yet to learn the most important lesson in this war. If they die due to voluntary stupidity, such is the cost of freedom.
Freedom is not free.
But he specifically came out and stated that children are largely unaffected by covid and thus should not be taking the vaccines.
No one except the deep state. And hence the media. And hence the sheep. And hence even the "no one disliked that" statement would be about just as weaponizeable as an anti-vaxx statement. Regardless, it would create a huge uproar and a big debate about what Trump really believes when much of the MAGA movement is anti-vaxx.
It would get the focus back on Trump. It would allow the media to re-inflame the ol' "Orange man bad" brainwashing trigger. Exactly what needs to be avoided if we are supposed to get out of this crazy situation that is MUCH worse than just the mega pressured, yet still voluntary choice of whether or not to take the vaccines:
We have mandates, qr code tyranny control system, full deep state take over of the whole world with total control of everyone.
Surely that is way more serious a threat than one more old man saying "take the vaccines" a couple of times when most who listen to him know not to listen to him about that.
Thank you for talking sense. I've been gaslit by people for 2 days on this board despite being a patriot for voicing what you are much less cleverly.
*To be clear i mean I was explaining less cleverly haha
I'm interested to know how the mainstream (((controlled))) media being against him would be an issue?
The mainstream media has always been an issue. They are literally the main reason for all the division in this country and why the leftists hate our guts and think we deserve to be put in gulag.
Their entire reality is formulated around false information they believe and revere as truth.
I'm leaning your way. The only other reasonable explanation is, Trump rarely says anything at face value. It's never meant to mean what he says. Speaking in codes quite often.
That's just another scenario. I'm not saying I'm buying that scenario myself, but it is one.
Down votes say you're "over the target"...howls....
Exactly
my best guess is depopulation had to happen either way and all world leaders and orgs are in on it. It is probably a powerstruggle of who gets to be in charge when the dust settles. Make more white babies because 'They' are trying to end us.
Because he's playing 5D chess. He also know that the people who like him are the sort of people who think for themselves. Very very few would jump off a cliff if he says to while to opposite is true of the feeble minded followers MSM
Because if someone by now is TOO FUNCTIONALLY RETARDED to see why, then they deserve to have fall over with their hearts exploding.
Makes perfect sense to anyone with two functioning brain cells.
Indeed it does if you ONLY have two functioning brain cells.
Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].
THIS MEANS YOU!
I can quote rules too, faggot.
"No doomers or shills: If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding."
Insinuating Trump is a blackhat without proof to back it up is shillspeak.
👆