Cut the pole on 45 degree angle...that way they have to replace it...might want to drill a few holes in the top of the little brown equipment box you'll find near most towers as well. About a liter of water with a cup of salt diluted could help too. Rubber Gloves and shoes are a good thing as well try to stay dry.
Yep
Add salt and the liquid becomes a more efficient conductor.
Type of fluid isn't as important. Just make sure your beer is flat our you're going to make a mess.
Most people don't understand what a digital communication standard is. The old analog phones broadcast a high power signal to a tower. Not much different than yelling at the neighbors from across the yard. Cell phones use digital transmission rather than analog. Actually, that's a misnomer, as there is still an analog signal, but the transmit power is much less than the old analog phones used. Voice and data is transmitted on the analog signal via digital encoding (using the G standards). So the 3G, 4G, LTE labels are a way of describing the digital encoding standard being used. There's a lot of marketing associated with that.
Also, cell phones don't transmit continuously, as that uses a lot of power. Unless you are sending a large amount of data, like pictures, then the phone transmits until the data has been sent. Voice isn't a lot of data density, so the phone sends the data in small bursts, or packets, then goes silent for a short time while another phone transmits on the same channel. I'm not sure how many phones a single channel can support with voice transmissions though. Voice data rate is low compared to almost anything else, but there's overhead in managing multiple phones on a single channel.
The thing that people get excited about when it comes to 5G is that the it has been associated with opening up new transmission frequencies (or spectrum). Some of those frequencies are in fairly high ranges, and some of them are associated with specific frequencies that are preferentially absorbed by various molecules, like oxygen. Is that bad? Hard to say.
A microwave oven works by concentrating a lot of RF (radio frequency) energy into a small area. Typically 1000 Watts. A cell phone typically transmits at less than 1 Watt. And cell phone power isn't concentrated, it radiates out from an antenna, so the actual RF power drops off with the square of the distance (there are things that affect that, but phased array antennas are not typically found in a cell phone, and if they were, the signal energy would be transmitted away from the body to get the best signal reception). So if you use the speaker and set the phone a couple feet away, the RF energy absorbed by your body is substantially reduced.
Finally, a note about ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is bad. That's the stuff that changes DNA, makes things radioactive, etc. Ionizing radiation is a function of wavelength or frequency. The wavelength needs to be close to the size of the molecules affected. Typical cell phone wavelengths are 2inches (50mm) to about 20 inches (500mm). Ionizing radiation wavelengths start in the UV light spectrum, at around 370nm. Roughly 1 million times shorter. We know UV causes cancer, but it doesn't make stuff radioactive, because it doesn't interact with matter on the atomic level. Wavelengths need to be roughly 10,000 time shorter for that to occur.
I always thought this was a weird rabbit hole. Didn't we learn there isn't really such a 'thing' has 3g/4g etc? Like there wasn't any uniform specification and just became marketing buzzwords? This is why T-mobile rolled out 4G, called out on their fake 4G, and later it became 4G LTE?
I think it was T-Mobile displayed HSPA and UMTS as 4g on the indicator bar on people's phones when really it is 3G technology. LTE and WiMax (Sprint's failed 4g) are the only true 4g technologies as far as I know. 5g that uses NR (new radio) is true 5g but 5GE from AT&T is actually LTE.
I've never kept up with the various carriers interpretation of the Telecom standards. I do know they all use marketing to pretend they are on the cutting edge of the technology while they slowly implement updated technologies to relieve channel congestion. It's a cost benefit thing - increase the customer base by putting up another tower, or upgrading the transcoding hardware. If they don't do something, they start losing customers.
I think Chugga got most of it as far as the carriers go. Telecommunication specifications / standards and implementation are never really the same thing. Which is true of a lot of standards. No one wants to advertise "we're 2 generations behind the competition", so what any of them mean by this G or that G varies by carrier.
The point I was trying to make is that the 5G specification (or really, the communications specification that people brand as 5G) is an encoding specification with the ability to transfer a lot more data in the same bandwidth. So you can implement 5G on any existing channel, and exotic frequencies are not required. That is also the reason why 2G and 3G is being phased out. Those standards use a lot of spectrum compared to the amount of data transfer. Removing those increases the amount of data each channel can support, and increases the efficiency of each channel.
I had seen similar burnings in a utube vid when 5g started rolling out and its what prevented certain fire depts and schools from placing them on their buildings.
A theory I heard yesterday on a random stream on foxhole.app was 5g antennae's would become a new HAARP array, in plain sight.
None of those looked like 5G antennas. They appeared to be ordinary 3G and LTE towers. 5G uses a much more sophisticated circular phased array antenna that can do adaptive beam forming. They are usually very small as well.
Ive got a business in a small town 10 miles outside a major city. There is 3 cell towers within 250 yards of my building. I kinda feel like my heath had declined over the last 5 years that I've been in there. My goal is to move my shop a lot further ouy of town.
Yep, we are up to like 60 or so in our small city. Our Mayor is a big "smart" city advocate and conveniently traveled to China Nov 2019 in order to "help strengthen US-China relations"
A battery powered angle grinder will do the job in no time.
Cut the pole on 45 degree angle...that way they have to replace it...might want to drill a few holes in the top of the little brown equipment box you'll find near most towers as well. About a liter of water with a cup of salt diluted could help too. Rubber Gloves and shoes are a good thing as well try to stay dry.
How about coffee or beer? Those nuke electronics.
Yep Add salt and the liquid becomes a more efficient conductor. Type of fluid isn't as important. Just make sure your beer is flat our you're going to make a mess.
Or the beer could be shit, like Pabst Blue Ribbon.
Frank's favorite beer
Most werent 5g towers
Probably all true....
Yet...
Still the great awakening.
And we're still alive.
People need to learn the difference between 5G, and RF frequencies, wavelegth, and RF energy.
5G is a digital encoding specification. Just like 4G was. And 3G. Etc.
Are you saying 3g,4g,5g really isn't bad?
Most people don't understand what a digital communication standard is. The old analog phones broadcast a high power signal to a tower. Not much different than yelling at the neighbors from across the yard. Cell phones use digital transmission rather than analog. Actually, that's a misnomer, as there is still an analog signal, but the transmit power is much less than the old analog phones used. Voice and data is transmitted on the analog signal via digital encoding (using the G standards). So the 3G, 4G, LTE labels are a way of describing the digital encoding standard being used. There's a lot of marketing associated with that.
Also, cell phones don't transmit continuously, as that uses a lot of power. Unless you are sending a large amount of data, like pictures, then the phone transmits until the data has been sent. Voice isn't a lot of data density, so the phone sends the data in small bursts, or packets, then goes silent for a short time while another phone transmits on the same channel. I'm not sure how many phones a single channel can support with voice transmissions though. Voice data rate is low compared to almost anything else, but there's overhead in managing multiple phones on a single channel.
The thing that people get excited about when it comes to 5G is that the it has been associated with opening up new transmission frequencies (or spectrum). Some of those frequencies are in fairly high ranges, and some of them are associated with specific frequencies that are preferentially absorbed by various molecules, like oxygen. Is that bad? Hard to say.
A microwave oven works by concentrating a lot of RF (radio frequency) energy into a small area. Typically 1000 Watts. A cell phone typically transmits at less than 1 Watt. And cell phone power isn't concentrated, it radiates out from an antenna, so the actual RF power drops off with the square of the distance (there are things that affect that, but phased array antennas are not typically found in a cell phone, and if they were, the signal energy would be transmitted away from the body to get the best signal reception). So if you use the speaker and set the phone a couple feet away, the RF energy absorbed by your body is substantially reduced.
Finally, a note about ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is bad. That's the stuff that changes DNA, makes things radioactive, etc. Ionizing radiation is a function of wavelength or frequency. The wavelength needs to be close to the size of the molecules affected. Typical cell phone wavelengths are 2inches (50mm) to about 20 inches (500mm). Ionizing radiation wavelengths start in the UV light spectrum, at around 370nm. Roughly 1 million times shorter. We know UV causes cancer, but it doesn't make stuff radioactive, because it doesn't interact with matter on the atomic level. Wavelengths need to be roughly 10,000 time shorter for that to occur.
I always thought this was a weird rabbit hole. Didn't we learn there isn't really such a 'thing' has 3g/4g etc? Like there wasn't any uniform specification and just became marketing buzzwords? This is why T-mobile rolled out 4G, called out on their fake 4G, and later it became 4G LTE?
I think it was T-Mobile displayed HSPA and UMTS as 4g on the indicator bar on people's phones when really it is 3G technology. LTE and WiMax (Sprint's failed 4g) are the only true 4g technologies as far as I know. 5g that uses NR (new radio) is true 5g but 5GE from AT&T is actually LTE.
I've never kept up with the various carriers interpretation of the Telecom standards. I do know they all use marketing to pretend they are on the cutting edge of the technology while they slowly implement updated technologies to relieve channel congestion. It's a cost benefit thing - increase the customer base by putting up another tower, or upgrading the transcoding hardware. If they don't do something, they start losing customers.
I think Chugga got most of it as far as the carriers go. Telecommunication specifications / standards and implementation are never really the same thing. Which is true of a lot of standards. No one wants to advertise "we're 2 generations behind the competition", so what any of them mean by this G or that G varies by carrier.
The point I was trying to make is that the 5G specification (or really, the communications specification that people brand as 5G) is an encoding specification with the ability to transfer a lot more data in the same bandwidth. So you can implement 5G on any existing channel, and exotic frequencies are not required. That is also the reason why 2G and 3G is being phased out. Those standards use a lot of spectrum compared to the amount of data transfer. Removing those increases the amount of data each channel can support, and increases the efficiency of each channel.
I had seen similar burnings in a utube vid when 5g started rolling out and its what prevented certain fire depts and schools from placing them on their buildings.
A theory I heard yesterday on a random stream on foxhole.app was 5g antennae's would become a new HAARP array, in plain sight.
None of those looked like 5G antennas. They appeared to be ordinary 3G and LTE towers. 5G uses a much more sophisticated circular phased array antenna that can do adaptive beam forming. They are usually very small as well.
would be nice to see MSM go up in flames like this
thanks for posting such beautiful videos.
just noticed your call sign.... awesome!
Lol. (or is it kek, now?) roddenberry was a genius. he knew great literature, the bible and human nature.
you call roddenberry dad? wha???? --
The globalists don’t need a vaccine to depopulate the planet, just a prettier iPhone for normies to drool🤤 over while they get irritated…
Wow
Ive got a business in a small town 10 miles outside a major city. There is 3 cell towers within 250 yards of my building. I kinda feel like my heath had declined over the last 5 years that I've been in there. My goal is to move my shop a lot further ouy of town.
None of ours here are yet. I wish they would though.
Yep, we are up to like 60 or so in our small city. Our Mayor is a big "smart" city advocate and conveniently traveled to China Nov 2019 in order to "help strengthen US-China relations"
Gonna go ahead and plug this badass website I stumbled across a few years ago while performing DMT research:
http://kundaliniandcelltowers.com/